Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T00:30:59.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brucella bacteriophage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

M. J. Pickett  and
Eric L. Nelson
M. J. Pickett
Affiliation:
From the Department of Bacteriology, University of California at Los Angeles
Eric L. Nelson
Affiliation:
From the Department of Bacteriology, University of California at Los Angeles
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Filtrates prepared from suspensions and broth cultures of Brucella vaŕiants were examined for the presence of Brucella bacteriophage. Smooth Brucella, when mixed with decimal dilutions of these filtrates in broth, (1) contained typical bacteriophage plaques when inoculated on solid medium, and (2) gave a heavy turbidity in broth after suitable incubation, but frequently failed to yield visible growth upon plating these broth cultures to a solid medium. These data were discussed in terms of Brucella bacteriophage, and it is concluded that the presence of this virus best accounted for the phenomena observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 1950 , pp. 500 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

References

REFERENCES

Delbrück, M. (1942). Bacterial viruses (bacteriophages). Advanc. Enzymol. 2, 1.Google Scholar
Hershey, A. D., Kalmanson, G. & Bronfenbrenner, J. (1943). Quantitative methods in the study of the phage-antiphage reaction. J. Immunol. 46, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickett, M. J. & Nelson, E. L. (1950). Incidence of Brucella in ‘normal’ human bloods. Society of American Bacteriologists, Bacteriological Proceedings, 42.Google Scholar
Smith, H. W. (1949). A search for bacteriophages active upon bacteria of the Brucella genus. J. Hyg., Camb., 47, 414.Google ScholarPubMed