Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T08:34:29.801Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Changing trends of gonococcal infection in homosexual men in Edinburgh

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. D. C. Ross ,
A. McMillan  and
H. young
J. D. C. Ross
Affiliation:
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Lauriston Building, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9YW
A. McMillan
Affiliation:
Department of Genitourinary Medicine, Lauriston Building, Edinburgh Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh EH3 9YW
H. young
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Edinburgh
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an attempt to explain the recent resurgence of homosexually-acquired gonorrhoea in the Lothian region of Scotland the number of infections and pattern of infection (urethral, rectal and pharyngeal) of all gonococcal isolates from homosexual men attending the Department of Genitourinary Medicine at Edinburgh Royal Infirmary between 1985 and 1990 were analysed. Serovar typing data were available from infections acquired between January 1986 and December 1990. A correlation between one serovar, Bacejk/Brpyust, and the overall pattern of gonorrhoea was observed. The number of infections caused by minor serovars also correlated with rates of gonococcal infection. The number of minor serovars isolated, which may represent strains from other geographical locations, is related to the total incidence of gonorrhoea. It is possible that the incidence of Bacejk/Brpyust may be determined by the size of the infected pool of gonorrhoea. The most likely explanation for the recent increase in gonorrhoea is a change in sexual behaviour and/or an influx of strains from other geographical areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
Epidemiology & Infection , Volume 107 , Issue 3 , December 1991 , pp. 585 - 590
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Came, CA, Weller, IVD, Johnson, AM et al. Prevalence of Antibodies to human immunodeficiency virus, gonorrhoea rates and changed sexual behaviour in homosexual men. Lancet 1987; i: 656–8.Google Scholar
2.Van den Hoek, JAK, van Griensven, GJP, Countinho, RA. Increase in unsafe homosexual behaviour. Lancet 1990: 336: 179–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Communicable Disease Center. Trends in gonorrhoea in homosexually active men-King County. Washington. 1989. MMWR 1989; 38: 762–4.Google Scholar
4.Ross, JDC, McMillan, A, Young, H. Increasing incidence of gonorrhoea and syphilis in homosexual men in Edinburgh. Communicable Diseases and Environmental Health in Scotland Weekly Report 1991; 25(19/04): 3–4.Google Scholar
5.Coghill, D, Young, H. Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with monoclonal antibody coagglutination reagents. Genitourin Med 1987; 63: 225–32.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Coghill, DV, Gaitonde, R, Kelly, G, Young, H. Serological classification of Neisseria gonorrhoeae: serovars associated with homosexually acquired infection. In: Poolman, JT et al. , eds. Gonococci and meningococci. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. 1988: 63–72.Google Scholar
7.McMillan, A, Young, H. Gonorrhoea in the homosexual man: frequency of infection by culture site. Sexually transmitted diseases 1978; 5: 146–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Tomlinson, D, French, P, Harris, J, Mercey, D. Does rectal gonorrhoea reflect unsafe sex? Lancet 1991; 337: 502–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed