Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-plnhv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-08-31T15:56:45.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A conception of immunological specificity1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

W. T. J. Morgan
W. T. J. Morgan
Affiliation:
From the Serum Department of the Lister Institute, Elstree
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the last few years a considerable amount of experimental evidence has accumulated which indicates the importance of chemical structure in determining the specificity of both natural and synthetic antigens. This work has been summarized by Marrack (1934), Landsteiner (1936) and Morgan (1936), and it is therefore not proposed to discuss in detail the investigations which have contributed to our present-day conception of this aspect of immunity reactions. Contributions which seem essential for understanding the ideas developed in this communication will, however, receive mention.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , July 1937 , pp. 372 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1937

References

REFERENCES

Berger, E. (1936). Proc. 2nd Internal. Congr. for Microbiol.London.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1934). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 15, 364.Google Scholar
Chow, B. F. & Goebel, W. F. (1935). J. Exp. Med. 62, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durham, H. E. (1901). J. Exp. Med. 5, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erlenmeyer, H. & Berger, E. (1932). Biochem. Z. 255, 429.Google Scholar
Furth, J. & Landsteiner, K. (1929). J. Exp. Med. 49, 727.Google Scholar
Goebel, W. F. (1936). J. Exp. Med. 64, 29.Google Scholar
Goebel, W. F., Babers, F. H. & Avery, O. T. (1932). J. Exp. Med. 55, 761.Google Scholar
Haurowitz, F. (1936). Proc. 2nd Internat. Congr. for Microbiol.London.Google Scholar
Haurowitz, F. & Breinl, F. (1933). Z. physiol. Chem. 214, 111.Google Scholar
Heidelberger, M. & Kendall, F. K. (1934). J. Exp. Med. 59, 519.Google Scholar
Hooker, S. B. & Boyd, W. C. (1933). J. Immunol. 25, 61.Google Scholar
Hooker, S. B. & Boyd, W. C. (1934). J. Immunol. 26, 469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooker, S. B. & Boyd, W. C. (1936). J. Immunol. 30, 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landsteiner, K. (1936). The Specificity of Serological Reactions. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Landsteiner, K. & van der Scheer, J. (1925). J. Exp. Med.. 42, 123.Google Scholar
Landsteiner, K. & van der Scheer, J. (1936). J. Exp. Med.. 63, 325.Google Scholar
Marrack, J. R. (1934). The Chemistry of Antigens and Antibodies. London.Google Scholar
Marrack, J. R. (1936). Proc. 2nd Internat. Congr. for Microbiol.London.Google Scholar
Meyer, K. & Morgan, W. T. J. (1935). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 16, 476.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. T. J. (1936). Chem. and Industry. 55, 284.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. T. J. (1936a). Proc. 2nd Internat. Congr. for Microbiol.London.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. & Osborne, T. B. (1913). J. Infect. Dis. 12, 341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar