Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Correlation between measles vaccine doses: implications for the maintenance of elimination

  • A. McKee (a1), M. J. Ferrari (a1) and K. Shea (a1)
Abstract

Measles eradication efforts have been successful at achieving elimination in many countries worldwide. Such countries actively work to maintain this elimination by continuing to improve coverage of two routine doses of measles vaccine following measles elimination. While improving measles vaccine coverage is always beneficial, we show, using a steady-state analysis of a dynamical model, that the correlation between populations receiving the first and second routine dose also has a significant impact on the population immunity achieved by a specified combination of first and second dose coverage. If the second dose is administered to people independently of whether they had the first dose, high second-dose coverage improves the proportion of the population receiving at least one dose, and will have a large effect on population immunity. If the second dose is administered only to people who have had the first dose, high second-dose coverage reduces the rate of primary vaccine failure, but does not reach people who missed the first dose; this will therefore have a relatively small effect on population immunity. When doses are administered dependently, and assuming the first dose has higher coverage, increasing the coverage of the first dose has a larger impact on population immunity than does increasing the coverage of the second. Correlation between vaccine doses has a significant impact on the level of population immunity maintained by current vaccination coverage, potentially outweighing the effects of age structure and, in some cases, recent improvements in vaccine coverage. It is therefore important to understand the correlation between vaccine doses as such correlation may have a large impact on the effectiveness of measles vaccination strategies.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Correlation between measles vaccine doses: implications for the maintenance of elimination
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Correlation between measles vaccine doses: implications for the maintenance of elimination
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Correlation between measles vaccine doses: implications for the maintenance of elimination
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Corresponding author
Author for correspondence: Amalie McKee, E-mail: amalie@unm.edu
References
Hide All
1. Perry, RT, et al. (2015) Progress towards regional measles elimination, worldwide, 2000–2014. World Health Organization Weekly Epidemiological Record 46, 623631.
2. Pan American Health Organization and World Health Organization. Measles elimination in the Americas. Available at (http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=12526%3Ameasles-elimination-in-the-americas&catid=6648%3Afact-sheets&Itemid=40721&lang=pt (Accessed 14 November 2016).
3. World Health Organization. Measles outbreaks across Europe threaten progress towards elimination. Available at http://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/sections/press-releases/2017/measles-outbreaks-across-europe-threaten-progress-towards-elimination (Accessed 14 June 2017).
4. Liu, L, et al. (2015) Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality in 2000–13, with projections to inform post-2015 priorities: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet 385, 430440.
5. Perry, RT, et al. (2014) Global control and regional elimination of measles, 2000–2011. CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 63, 103107.
6. World health Organization. Global Vaccine Action Plan 2011-2020. Available at (http://www.who.int/immunization/global_vaccine_action_plan/GVAP_doc_2011_2020/en/ (Accessed 29 June 2017).
7. Gushulak, BD and MacPherson, DW (2004) Globalization of infectious diseases: the impact of migration. Clinical Infectious Diseases 38, 17421748.
8. Leite, RD, Barreto, JLTMS and Sousa, AQ (2015) Measles reemergence in Ceará, Northeast Brazil, 15 years after elimination. Emerging Infectious Diseases 21, 16811683.
9. World Health Organization Representative Office: Mongolia. Measles outbreak in Mongolia – FAQs. Available at http://www.wpro.who.int/mongolia/mediacentre/releases/20160505-measles-outbreak-faqs/en/ (Accessed 4 October 2016).
10. World Health Organization: Western Pacific Region. Mongolia certified measles free. Available at http://www.wpro.who.int/mediacentre/releases/2014/20140708/en/ (Accessed 29 September 2016).
11. McKee, A, Shea, K and Ferrari, MJ (2017) Optimal age targets to maintain measles elimination with a two-dose routine policy. Epidemiology and Infection 145, 227235.
12. Ferrari, MJ, Grenfell, BT and Strebel, PM (2013) Think globally, act locally: the role of local demographics and vaccination coverage in the dynamic response of measles infection to control. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368, 17.
13. Anderson, RM and May, RM (1985) Vaccination and herd immunity to infectious diseases. Nature 318, 323329.
14. Ellner, SP, et al. (1998) Noise and nonlinearity in measles epidemics: combining mechanistic and statistical approaches to population modeling. The American Naturalist 151, 425440.
15. World Health Organization. Vaccine-preventable diseases: monitoring system 2016 global summary. Available at http://apps.who.int/immunization_monitoring/globalsummary/schedules (Accessed 30 September 2016).
16. de Quadros, CA et al. (1998) Measles eradication: experience in the Americas. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 76(Suppl. 2), 4752.
17. Irons, B and Dobbins, JG (2011) The Caribbean experience in maintaining high measles vaccine coverage. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 204( Suppl.), S284S288.
18. Elam-evans, LD, et al. (2014) National, state, and selected local area vaccination coverage Among children aged 19–35 months. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 63, 741762.
19. Niewiesk, S (2014) Maternal antibodies: clinical significance, mechanism of interference with immune responses, and possible vaccination strategies. Frontiers in Immunology 5, 115.
20. McKee, A, Ferrari, MJ and Shea, K (2015) The effects of maternal immunity and age structure on population immunity to measles. Theoretical Ecology 8, 261271.
21. Smith, PJ, Chu, SY and Barker, LE (2004) Children who have received no vaccines: who are they and where do they live? Pediatrics 114, 187195.
22. Uzicanin, A and Zimmerman, L (2011) Field effectiveness of live attenuated measles-containing vaccines: a review of published literature. The Journal of Infect Diseases 204(Suppl), S133S148.
23. Leuridan, E, et al. (2010) Early waning of maternal measles antibodies in era of measles elimination: longitudinal study. British Medical Journal 340, c1626c1626.
24. Gupta, SK, et al. (2011) Introduction strategy of a second dose measles containing vaccine in India. Indian Pediatrics 48, 379382.
25. Shefer, A, et al. (1999) Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature. Epidemiolic Reviews 21, 96142.
26. Toikilik, S, et al. (2010) Are hard-to-reach populations being reached with immunization services? Findings from the 2005 Papua New Guinea national immunization coverage survey. Vaccine 28, 46734679.
27. Cockcroft, A, et al. (2009) One size does not fit all: local determinants of measles vaccination in four districts of Pakistan. BMC International Health and Human Rights 9(Suppl. 1), S4.
28. Metcalf, CJE, et al. (2015) Transport networks and inequities in vaccination: remoteness shapes measles vaccine coverage and prospects for elimination across Africa. Epidemiology and Infection 143, 14571466.
29. Bhutta, ZA (2011) The last mile in global poliomyelitis eradication. Lancet 378, 549552.
30. Dummer, TJ, et al. (2012) Immunization completeness of children under two years of age in Nova Scotia, Canada. Canadian Journal of Public Health 103, e363e367.
31. de Waroux, OLP, et al. (2013) Timeliness and completeness of vaccination and risk factors for low and late vaccine uptake in young children living in rural southern Tanzania. International Health 5, 139147.
32. Tsega, A, Daniel, F and Steinglass, R (2014) Monitoring coverage of fully immunized children. Vaccine 32, 70477049.
33. World Health Organization Measles and Rubella Initiative. A guide to introducing a second dose of measles vaccine into routine immunization schedules. Available at http://www.who.int/immunization/documents/WHO_IVB_13.03/en/ (Accessed 5 October 2016).
34. Lessler, J, et al. (2011) Measuring the performance of vaccination programs using cross-sectional surveys: a likelihood framework and retrospective analysis. PLoS Medicine 8, e1001110.
35. Minetti, A, et al. (2014) Reaching hard-to-reach individuals: nonselective versus targeted outbreak response vaccination for measles. American Journal of Epidemiology 179, 245251.
36. Nedeljković, J, et al. (2016) Resurgence of measles in Serbia 2010-2011 highlights the need for supplementary immunization activities. Epidemiology and Infection 144, 11211128.
37. Ruijs, WLM, et al. (2012) How orthodox protestant parents decide on the vaccination of their children: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 12, 111.
38. Yoder, JS and Dworkin, MS (2006) Vaccination usage among an old-order amish community in illinois. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 25, 11821183.
39. Bonds, MH, et al. (2010) Poverty trap formed by the ecology of infectious diseases. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 277, 11851192.
40. Mbabazi, WB, et al. (2015) Innovations in communication technologies for measles supplemental immunization activities: Lessons from Kenya measles vaccination campaign, November 2012. Health Policy and Planning 30, 638644.
41. Obregón, R, et al. (2009) Achieving polio eradication: a review of health communication evidence and lessons learned in India and Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 87, 624630.
42. Curry, DW, et al. (2014) Assessing the effectiveness of house-to-house visits on routine oral polio immunization completion and tracking of defaulters. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 32, 356366.
43. Takahashi, S, et al. (2015) Reduced vaccination and the risk of measles and other childhood infections post-Ebola. Science 347, 12401242.
44. Bharti, N, et al. (2016) Measuring populations to improve vaccination coverage. Nature Scientific Reports 5, 110.
45. Cuesta, JG, et al. (2015) Measles vaccination coverage survey in moba, katanga, democratic Republic of Congo, 2013: need to adapt routine and mass vaccination campaigns to reach the unreached. PLoS Current Outbreaks 7: ecurrents.outbreaks. 8a1b00760dfd81481eb42234bd18ced3.
46. Fekadu, L, et al. (2016) Reaching the unreached with polio vaccine and other child survival interventions through partnership with military in Angola. Vaccine 34, 51555158.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

McKee et al. supplementary material
McKee et al. supplementary material 1

 Unknown (25 KB)
25 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 38
Total number of PDF views: 221 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 405 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st February 2018 - 22nd August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.