Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:48:09.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hospital Salmonella Johannesburg infection and its possible role in the community spread of the infection in Hong Kong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

C. H. Teoh-Chan
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
P. Y. Chau
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Doris Tse
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
W. K. Sin
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
H. M. H. IP
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
R. Lan
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Department of Paediatrics, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Salmonella johannesburg (1, 40: b: e, n, x), a previously rare salmonella serotype, has established itself rapidly as an important and highly prevalent cause of gastroenteritis among children. The clinical features of the infection are usually mild but chronic. It has been suggested that S. johannesburg was introduced into Hong Kong through imported foods but no common vehicle could be traced as the source of infection. A thorough investigation of one paediatric ward in a general hospital revealed that non-infected patients admitted to the ward usually acquired S. johannesburg infection within 3–7 days, with or without symptoms. Thus hospital cross-infection could be a significant factor in contributing to its rapid spread in the community. Furthermore, the rapidity with which S. johannesburg spread was facilitated by (a) its tendency to produce a chronic infection, (b) its multiple resistance to antibiotics, and (c) the higher infectivity of S. johannesburg over other salmonellas endemic in this locality. These factors combined with the overcrowded conditions in many of the hospitals in Hong Kong facilitated the occurrence of hospital infection, which in its turn contributed to the spread of the infection in the local community.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

References

REFERENCES

Brine, W. B., Gangarosa, E. J., Bennett, J. V. & Barker, W. H. (1973). Institutional salmonellosis. Journal of Infectious Diseases 128, 357–60.Google Scholar
Centerfor Disease Control (1975). Salmonella Surveillance Report, no. 125, Annual Summary 1974. U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare/Public Health Service, August 1975.Google Scholar
Chau, P. Y. & Huang, C. T. (1976). A simple procedure for screening of salmonellae using a semi-solid enrichment medium and a semi-solid indicator medium. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 41 283–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauffman, F. & Henning, M. W. (1952). Two new salmonella types (S. worcester and S. johannesburg) from South Africa. Acta pathologica et microbiologica scandinavica 31, 586–7.Google Scholar
Silberstein, W. & Gerichter, C. B. (1964). Salmonellosis in Israel. In The World Problems of Salmonellosis (ed. Van Oye, E.), pp. 335–52. The Hague: Dr W. Junk.Google Scholar
Taylor, J., Lapage, S. P., Brookes, M., King, G. J. G., Payne, D. J. H., Sandiford, B. R. & Stevenson, J. S. (1965). Sources of salmonellae, 1951–1963. Monthly Bulletin of the Ministry of Health and the Public Health Laboratory Service 24, 164229, 236–77.Google Scholar