Skip to main content

Household structure and infectious disease transmission

  • T. HOUSE (a1) and M. J. KEELING (a1)

One of the central tenets of modern infectious disease epidemiology is that an understanding of heterogeneities, both in host demography and transmission, allows control to be efficiently optimized. Due to the strong interactions present, households are one of the most important heterogeneities to consider, both in terms of predicting epidemic severity and as a target for intervention. We consider these effects in the context of pandemic influenza in Great Britain, and find that there is significant local (ward-level) variation in the basic reproductive ratio, with some regions predicted to suffer 50% faster growth rate of infection than the mean. Childhood vaccination was shown to be highly effective at controlling an epidemic, generally outperforming random vaccination and substantially reducing the variation between regions; only nine out of over 10 000 wards did not obey this rule and these can be identified as demographically atypical regions. Since these benefits of childhood vaccination are a product of correlations between household size and number of dependent children in the household, our results are qualitatively robust for a variety of disease scenarios.

Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: Dr T. House, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. (Email:
Hide All
1. Cauchemez S, et al. A Bayesian MCMC approach to study transmission of influenza: application to household longitudinal data. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23: 34693487.
2. Longini IM, et al. Estimating household and community transmission parameters for influenza. American Journal of Epidemiology 1982; 115: 736751.
3. Hope-Simpson RE. Infectiousness of communicable diseases in the household. Lancet 1952; 2: 549554.
4. Wu JT, et al. Reducing the impact of the next influenza pandemic using household-based public health interventions. PLoS Medicine 2006; 3: 15321540.
5. Dodd PJ, Ferguson NM. Approximate disease dynamics in household-structured populations. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2007; 4: 11031106.
6. Fraser C. Estimating individual and household reproduction numbers in an emerging epidemic. PLoS ONE 2007; 2: 112.
7. Ball F, O'Neill P. Stochastic epidemic models in structured populations featuring dynamic vaccination and isolation. Journal of Applied Probability 2007; 44: 571585.
8. Ball F, Lyne O. Optimal vaccination schemes for epidemics among a population of households, with application to variola minor in Brazil. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2006; 15: 481497.
9. Ball F, Lyne O. Optimal vaccination policies for stochastic epidemics among a population of households. Mathematical Biosciences 2002; 177–178: 333354.
10. Ferguson NM, et al. Strategies for mitigating an influenza pandemic. Nature 2006; 442: 448452.
11. Viboud C, et al. Synchrony, waves, and spatial hierarchies in the spread of influenza. Science 2006; 312: 447451.
12. Germann T, et al. Mitigation strategies for pandemic influenza in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2006; 103: 59355940.
13. Chowell G, Nishiura H, Bettencourt LMA. Comparative estimation of the reproduction number for pandemic influenza from daily case notification data. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 4: 155166.
14. Roberts MG, et al. A model for the spread and control of pandemic influenza in an isolated geographical region. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 2006; 4: 325330.
15. Ferguson N, et al. Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in southeast asia. Nature (London) 2005; 437: 209214.
16. Gani R, et al. Potential impact of antiviral drug use during influenza pandemic. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2005; 11: 13551362.
17. Duerr H, et al. The impact of contact structure on infectious disease control: influenza and antiviral agents. Epidemiology and Infection 2007; 135: 11241132.
18. House T, Keeling MJ. Deterministic epidemic models with explicit household structure. Mathematical Biosciences 2008; 213: 2939.
19. Anderson RM, May RM. Infectious Diseases of Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
20. Keeling MJ, Rohani P. Modelling Infectious Diseases in Humans and Animals. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.
21. Melegaro A, Gay N, Medley G. Estimating the transmission parameters of pneumococcal carriage in households. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 433441.
22. Diekmann O, Heesterbeek J, Metz J. On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R 0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology 1990; 28: 365382.
23. Dieckmann O, Heesterbeek JAP. Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 2000.
24. Department of Health. Pandemic flu: a national framework for responding to an influenza pandemic. Department of Health, London, 2007.
25. Ball F, Mollison D, Scalia-Tomba G. Epidemics with two levels of mixing. Annals of Applied Probability 1997; 7: 4689.
26. Kermack WO, McKendrick AG. Contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series A 1927; 115: 700721.
27. Office for National Statistics. 2001 census: Commissioned table C0844. ESRC/JISC Census Programme.
28. Office for National Statistics. 2001 census: Digitised boundary data (England and Wales) [computer file].
29. General Register Office for Scotland. 2001 census: Digitised boundary data (Scotland) [computer file].
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

House supplementary pdf
House supplementary pdf

 PDF (99 KB)
99 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 255 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.