Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women in England: two methods of estimation

  • M. J. PRICE (a1), A. E. ADES (a2), D. DE ANGELIS (a3) (a4), N. J. WELTON (a2), J. MACLEOD (a2), K. TURNER (a2) and P. J. HORNER (a2) (a5)...
Summary

Information on the incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is essential for models of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes. We developed two independent estimates of CT incidence in women in England: one based on an incidence study, with estimates ‘recalibrated’ to the general population using data on setting-specific relative risks, and allowing for clearance and re-infection during follow-up; the second based on UK prevalence data, and information on the duration of CT infection. The consistency of independent sources of data on incidence, prevalence and duration, validates estimates of these parameters. Pooled estimates of the annual incidence rate in women aged 16–24 and 16–44 years for 2001–2005 using all these data were 0·05 [95% credible interval (CrI) 0·035–0·071] and 0·021 (95% CrI 0·015–0·028), respectively. Although, the estimates apply to England, similar methods could be used in other countries. The methods could be extended to dynamic models to synthesize, and assess the consistency of data on contact and transmission rates.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women in England: two methods of estimation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women in England: two methods of estimation
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women in England: two methods of estimation
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
The online version of this article is published within an Open Access environment subject to the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence . The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use.
Corresponding author
* Author for correspondence: Dr M. J. Price, School of Health and Population Sciences, Public Health Building, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. (Email: m.price.2@bham.ac.uk)
References
Hide All
1. Health Protection Agency. STI episodes seen in GUM clinics: annual data tables 2011 (http://www.hpa.org.uk/stiannualtables). Accessed 1 November 2010.
2. Adams, EJ, Turner, KME, Edmunds, WJ. The cost effectiveness of opportunistic chlamydia screening in England. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2007; 83: 354362.
3. Roberts, TE, et al. Cost effectiveness of home based population screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the UK: economic evaluation of chlamydia screening studies (ClaSS) project. British Medical Journal 2007; 335: 291294A.
4. Turner, KME, et al. Modelling the effectiveness of chlamydia screening in England. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2006; 82: 496502.
5. LaMontagne, DS, et al. Incidence and reinfection rates of genital chlamydial infection among women aged 16–24 years attending general practice, family planning and genitourinary medicine clinics in England: a prospective cohort study by the Chlamydia Recall Study Advisory Group. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2007; 83: 292303.
6. Adams, EJ, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and analysis of prevalence studies. Sexually Transmitted Infections 2004; 80: 354–62.
7. Ades, AE, Sutton, AJ. Multiparameter evidence synthesis in epidemiology and medical decision making: current appoaches. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 2006; 169: 535.
8. Goubar, A, et al. Estimates of human immunodeficiency virus prevalence and proportion diagnosed based on Bayesian multiparameter synthesis of surveillance data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 2008; 171: 541580.
9. Eddy, DM, Hasselblad, V, Shachter, R. Meta-analysis by the Confidence Profile Method. London: Academic Press, 1992.
10. Lunn, DJ, et al. WinBUGS – a Bayesian modeling framework: concepts, structure, and extensibility. Statistics and Computing 2000; 10: 325337.
11. Price, MJ, et al. Mixture-of-exponentials models to explain heterogeneity in studies of the duration of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Statistics in Medicine 2013; 32: 15471560.
12. Korenromp, EL, et al. What proportion of episodes of gonorrhoea and chlamydia becomes symptomatic? International Journal of STD & AIDS 2002; 13: 91101.
13. Geisler, WM. Duration of untreated, uncomplicated Chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and factors associated with chlamydia resolution: a review of human studies. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2010; 201 (Suppl. 2): S104S113.
14. Golden, MR, et al. Duration of untreated genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis – a review of the literature. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2000; 27: 329337.
15. Molano, M, et al. The natural course of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Colombian women: a 5-year follow-up study. Journal of Infectious Diseases 2005; 191: 907916.
16. Geisler, WM, et al. The natural history of untreated Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the interval between screening and returning for treatment. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2008; 35: 119123.
17. Rothman, KJ, Greenland, S, Lash, TL. Modern Epidemiology, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2008.
18. Macleod, J, et al. Coverage and uptake of systematic postal screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis and prevalence of infection in the United Kingdom general population: cross sectional study. British Medical Journal 2005; 330: 940942.
19. Oakeshott, P et al. Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trial. British Medical Journal 2010; 340: C1642.
20. Brooks, SP, Gelman, A. Alternative methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1998; 7: 434455.
21. Dempster, AP. The direct use of likelihood for significance testing. Statistics and Computing 1997; 7: 247252.
22. Spiegelhalter, DJ, et al. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 2002; 64: 583616.
23. Fenton, KA, et al. Sexual behaviour in Britain: reported sexually transmitted infections and prevalent genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Lancet 2001; 358: 18511854.
24. McCadden, A, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis testing in the second British national survey of sexual attitudes and lifestyles: respondent uptake and treatment outcomes. Sexually Transmitted Diseases 2005; 32: 387394.
25. Althaus, CL, et al. Transmission dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis affect the impact of screening programes. Epidemics 2010; 2: 123131.
26. Office for National Statistics. Census 2001, National Statistics: results on population of England and Wales [CD version], 2003. United Kingdom.
27. Presanis, AM, et al. Bayesian evidence synthesis for a transmission dynamic model for HIV among men who have sex with men. Biostatistics 2011; 12: 666681.
28. Grimmett, GDR, Stirzaker, DR. Probability and Random Processes, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.
29. Welton, NJ, Ades, AE. Estimation of Markov Chain transition probabilities and rates from fully and partially observed data: uncertainty propagation, evidence synthesis and model calibration. Medical Decision Making 2005; 25: 633645.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Price Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (44 KB)
44 KB

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 91 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 272 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 12th June 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.