Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T04:11:14.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The intermittent use of hexachlorophene soap—a controlled trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. A. C. Weatherall
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, Charing Cross Hospital, W.C. 2
H. I. Winner
Affiliation:
Department of Bacteriology, Charing Cross Hospital, W.C. 2
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The number of bacteria on the hands of nurses using 2 % hexachlorophene soap intermittently was compared with the numbers of bacteria on the hands of nurses using ordinary soap. No significant differences were observed.

This study would not have been possible without the whole-hearted co-operation of the Matron, Miss M. Schurr, the Deputy Matron, Miss G. Davies and the Sisters and Nursing Staff of Fulham Hospital.

We are also indebted to Mr T. Ridgewell, Mr T. F. Fletcher and Miss Julia Fisher for technical assistance, and to Messers Bibby and Co. For their generous gift of soap.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1963

References

Best, R. R., Coe, J. D., McMurtrey, G. B. & Henn, M. J. (1950). Effectiveness of soaps containing hexachlorophene for the surgical scrub. Arch. Surg. 61, 869.Google ScholarPubMed
Cade, A. R. (1950). Antiseptic soaps: a simplified in-vivo method for determining their degerming efficiency. Soap, 26, ii (July), 35.Google Scholar
Fahlberg, W. J., Swan, J. C. & Seastone, C. V. (1948). Studies on the retention of hexachlorophene (G11) in human skin. J. Bact. 56, 323.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurst, A., Stuttard, L. W. & Woodroffe, R. C. S. (1960). Disinfectants for use in barsoaps. J. Hyg., Camb., 58, 159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrie, P. & Jones, B. (1952). Hexachlorophene soap effect on the bacterial flora of the hands. Pharm. J. 168, 288.Google Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L. & Lilly, H. A. (1960). Disinfection of the hands of surgeons and nurses. Brit. med. J. i, 1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1960). Disinfection of the skin of operation sites. Brit. med. J. i, 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowbury, E. J. L., Lilly, H. A. & Bull, J. P. (1963). Disinfection of the hands: removal of resident bacteria. Brit. med. J. i, 1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. B. (1938). The bacteriology of normal skin; a new quantitative test applied to a study of the bacterial flora and the disinfectant action of mechanical cleansing. J. infect. Dis. 63, 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, P. B. & Bonnet, A. (1948). The antibacterial effects of G5, G11 and A151 with special reference to their use in the production of a germicidal soap. Surgery, 24, 542.Google ScholarPubMed
Traub, E. F., Newhall, C. A. & Fuller, J. R. (1944). The value of a new compound used in soap to reduce the bacterial flora of the human skin. Surg. Gynec. Obstet. 79, 205.Google Scholar