Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-16T22:54:51.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The isolation of salmonellas from animal feedingstuffs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. W. S. Harvey
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Cardiff
T. H. Price
Affiliation:
Public Health Laboratory, Cardiff
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A technique is described for the routine isolation of salmonellas from meat and bone meal samples used in animal feedingstuffs. The technique more than doubled the number of positives obtained by an orthodox method. Identical samples were used in the trial.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

References

Carnot, P. & Garnier, M. (1902). Sur la technique des cultures en tubes de sable. C. r. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 54, 748.Google Scholar
Craigie, J. (1931). Studies on serological reactions of flagella of B. typhosus. J. Immun. 21, 417.Google Scholar
Davies, D. G. & Harvey, R. W. S. (1953). Dried bones as a source of anthrax. Lancet ii, 880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. G. & Harvey, R. W. S. (1955). The isolation of Bacillus anthracis from bones. Lancet ii, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felsenfeld, O. (1945). The salmonella problem. Am. J. clin. Path. 15, 584.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. (1956). Choice of a selective medium for the routine isolation of members of the salmonella group. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 15, 118.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. (1958). Anthrax from bone meal. Br. med. J. ii, 1040.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S., Mahabir, D. E. & Price, T. H. (1966). A method of secondary enrichment for salmonellas independent of selectively toxic chemicals. J. Hyg., Camb. 64, 361.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Phillips, W. P. (1955). Survival of Salmonella paratyphi B in sewers: its significance in investigation of paratyphoid outbreaks. Lancet ii, 137.Google Scholar
Harvey, R. W. S. & Price, T. H. (1962). Salmonella serotypes and arizona paracolons isolated from Indian crushed bone. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 21, 54.Google ScholarPubMed
Harvey, R. W. S. & Thomson, S. (1953). Optimum temperature of incubation for isolation of salmonellae. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 12, 149.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J., Guinée, P. A. M., Kampelmacher, E. H. & Keulen, A. van (1963). Studies on the incidence of salmonella in imported fish meal. Zentbl. VetMed. 10, 542.Google Scholar
Jamieson, W. M. & Green, D. M. (1955). Anthrax and bone-meal fertilizer. Lancet i, 560.Google Scholar
Jepson, A. (1957). Bacteriological examination of manufactured meat products. Monograph Ser. W.H.O. no. 33, p. 420.Google Scholar
Jones, R. E. & Handley, W. R. C. (1945). A selective medium for the isolation of salmonella bacilli from heavily contaminated material. Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth 4, 107.Google Scholar
Loureiro, J. A. De (1942). A modification of Wilson and Blair's bismuth sulphite agar (stabilized stock solution). J. Hyg., Camb. 42, 224.Google Scholar
Pijper, A. (1952). Dimensional differentiation, filtration and separation of bacteria. J. Path. Bact. 64, 529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Report (1947). The bacteriology of spray-dried egg with particular reference to food poisoning. Spec. Rep. Ser. med. Res. Coun. no. 360, p. 8.Google Scholar
Stuart, P. F. & Pivnick, H. (1965). Isolation of salmonellae by selective motility systems. Appl. Microbiol. 13, 365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed