Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs

  • A. F. A. PIRES (a1), J. A. FUNK (a1) and C. A. BOLIN (a2)
Summary

A 3-year longitudinal study was conducted on a multi-site farrow-to-finish production system. For each of 18 cohorts at three finishing sites, 50 pigs were randomly selected. Faecal samples were collected every 2 weeks for 16 weeks. Salmonella was cultured from 453 (6·6%) of 6836 faecal samples. The pig-level incidence of Salmonella was 20·8% (187/899 pigs). Salmonella prevalence varied between cohorts and within pigs. The adjusted Salmonella prevalence decreased over the finishing period from 6·4% to 0·8%. Intermittent detection of Salmonella was found in more than 50% of pigs that were positive at more than one collection. The finding that the majority of pigs shed intermittently has implications for surveillance and research study design when determining Salmonella status. The variability in shedding over time, as well as between and within cohorts and pigs suggests that there may be time-variant risk factors for Salmonella shedding in swine.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Longitudinal study of Salmonella shedding in naturally infected finishing pigs
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Author for correspondence: Dr A. F. A. Pires, Food Safety and Toxicology Building, 1129 Farm Lane B 41, East Lansing, MI 48824-1314, USA. (Email: afapires11@gmail.com)
References
Hide All
1.Greig, JD, Ravel, A. Analysis of foodborne outbreak data reported internationally for source attribution. International Journal of Food Microbiology 2009; 130: 7787.
2.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Vital signs: incidence and trends of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food: foodborne diseases active surveillance network, 10 U. S. Sites, 1996–2010. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2011; 60: 749755.
3.Scallan, E, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States – major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases 2011; 17: 715.
4.Foley, SL, Lynne, AM, Nayak, R. Salmonella challenges: prevalence in swine and poultry and potential pathogenicity of such isolates. Journal of Animal Science 2008; 86: E149162.
5.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food – 10 states, 2009. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 2010; 59: 418422.
6.Boyen, F, et al. Non-typhoidal Salmonella infections in pigs: a closer look at epidemiology, pathogenesis and control. Veterinary Microbiology 2008; 130: 119.
7.Lo Fo Wong, DMA, et al. Epidemiology and control measures for Salmonella in pigs and pork. Livestock Production Science 2002; 76: 215222.
8.Rajic, A, et al. Longitudinal study of Salmonella species in 90 Alberta swine finishing farms. Veterinary Microbiology 2005; 105: 4756.
9.Farzan, A, et al. A longitudinal study of the Salmonella status on Ontario swine farms within the time period 2001–2006. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2008; 5: 579588.
10.Dorr, PM, et al. Longitudinal study of Salmonella dispersion and the role of environmental contamination in commercial swine production systems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2009; 75: 14781486.
11.Funk, JA, Davies, PR, Nichols, MA. Longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica in growing pigs reared in multiple-site swine production systems. Veterinary Microbiology 2001; 83: 4560.
12.Kranker, S, et al. Longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium infection in three Danish farrow-to-finish swine herds. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2003; 41: 22822288.
13.Nollet, N, et al. Distribution of Salmonella strains in farrow-to-finish pig herds: a longitudinal study. Journal of Food Protection 2005; 68: 20122021.
14.Beloeil, PA, et al. Longitudinal serological responses to Salmonella enterica of growing pigs in a subclinically infected herd. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2003; 60: 207226.
15.Rostagno, MH, Hurd, HS, McKean, JD. Variation of bacteriologic and serologic Salmonella enterica prevalence between cohorts within finishing swine production farms. Food Research International 2012; 45: 867870.
16.Kingston, DJ. A comparison of culturing drag swabs and litter for identification of infections with Salmonella spp. in commercial chicken flocks. Avian Diseases 1981; 25: 513516.
17.Davies, PR, et al. Comparison of methods for isolating Salmonella bacteria from faeces of naturally infected pigs. Journal of Applied Microbiology 2000; 89: 169177.
18.Fedorka-Cray, PJ, et al. Transmission of Salmonella Typhimurium to swine. Veterinary Microbiology 1994; 41: 333344.
19.van Winsen, RL, et al. Monitoring of transmission of Salmonella enterica serovars in pigs using bacteriological and serological detection methods. Veterinary Microbiology 2001; 80: 267274.
20.Osterberg, J, Lewerin, SS, Wallgren, P. Direct and indirect transmission of four Salmonella enterica serotypes in pigs. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2010; 52: 17.
21.Davies, PR, et al. Prevalence of Salmonella in finishing swine raised in different production systems in North Carolina, USA. Epidemiology and Infection 1997; 119: 237244.
22.Hurd, HS, et al. Estimation of the Salmonella enterica prevalence in finishing swine. Epidemiology and Infection 2004; 132: 127135.
23.Bahnson, PB, et al. Herd-level risk factors for Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica in U. S. market pigs. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 2006; 76: 249262.
24.Gebreyes, WA, Thakur, S, Morrow, WEM. Comparison of prevalence, antimicrobial resistance, and occurrence of multidrug-resistant Salmonella in antimicrobial-free and conventional pig production. Journal of Food Protection 2006; 69: 743748.
25.Wang, B, et al. Sub-iliac lymph nodes at slaughter lack ability to predict Salmonella enterica prevalence for swine farms. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2010; 7: 795800.
26.USDA-APHIS. Salmonella on U. S. swine sites – prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility. (http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_health/nahms/swine/downloads/swine2006/Swine2006_is_salmonella.pdf). Accessed 23 February 2011.
27.van der Wolf, PJ, et al. A longitudinal study of Salmonella enterica infections in high-and low-seroprevalence finishing swine herds in The Netherlands. Veterinary Quarterly 2001; 23: 116121.
28.Rajic, A, et al. Salmonella infections in ninety Alberta swine finishing farms: serological prevalence, correlation between culture and serology, and risk factors for infection. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2007; 4: 169177.
29.Merialdi, G, et al. Longitudinal study of Salmonella infection in Italian farrow-to-finish swine herds. Zoonoses and Public Health 2008; 55: 222226.
30.Vigo, GB, et al. Salmonella enterica subclinical infection: bacteriological, serological, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, and antimicrobial resistance profiles-longitudinal study in a three-site farrow-to-finish farm. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease 2009; 6: 965972.
31.Dohoo, IR, Martin, W, Stryhn, H. Veterinary Epidemiologic Research, 2nd edn.Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada: VER Inc., 2010, pp. 173174.
32.Mannion, C, et al. Efficacy of cleaning and disinfection on pig farms in Ireland. Veterinary Record 2007; 161: 371375.
33.Zewde, BM, et al. Comparison of swiffer wipes and conventional drag swab methods for the recovery of Salmonella in swine production systems. Journal of Food Protection 2009; 72: 142146.
34.Scherer, K, et al. Time course of infection with Salmonella Typhimurium and its influence on faecal shedding, distribution in inner organs, and antibody response in fattening pigs. Journal of Food Protection 2008; 71: 699705.
35.Funk, JA, Davies, PR, Nichols, MA. The effect of faecal sample weight on detection of Salmonella enterica in swine feces. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2000; 12: 412418.
36.Rostagno, MH, et al. Culture methods differ on the isolation of Salmonella enterica serotypes from naturally contaminated swine faecal samples. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2005; 17: 8083.
37.Love, BC, Rostagno, MH. Comparison of five culture methods for Salmonella isolation from swine faecal samples of known infection status. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation 2008; 20: 620624.
38.Funk, J. Pre-harvest food safety diagnostics for Salmonella serovars. Part 1: Microbiological culture. Journal of Swine Health and Production 2003; 11: 8790.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology & Infection
  • ISSN: 0950-2688
  • EISSN: 1469-4409
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed