Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T01:20:41.405Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on the Hygienic Condition of Public Swimming Baths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

A. M. M. Grierson
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It is an undisputed fact that various diseases have been transmitted by the water of swimming baths, and although such cases have not been very frequently recorded it is nevertheless important that steps should be taken to prevent their occurrence. This can only be done by maintaining a standard of purity of the bath water similar to drinking water.

It is evident that the water of swimming ponds cannot be kept pure by the fill and empty system, but should be subjected to a process of continuous filtration combined with aeration and chlorination.

In order to maintain the standard of purity thus obtained it is necessary that a strict supervision should be made of the bathers, and those who have any infectious condition should not be permitted to use the pond.

Regulations similar to those suggested by the American Public Health Association should be made and enforced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , April 1930 , pp. 66 - 78
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

References

REFERENCES

Amersbach, K. (1921). Lancet, ii, 519.Google Scholar
Batten, F. E. (1911). Public Health (quoted by Graham Forbes (1927), J. State Med. 35, 595).Google Scholar
Cheatle, A. H. (1921). Lancet, ii, 828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daggett, W. I. and Cove-Smith, R. (1929). Brit. Med. J. ii, 296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engering, P. (1923). Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infectionsk. 100, 314 (quoted by Fraser (1925), Brit. J. Ven. Dis. 1, 268).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham Forbes, J. (1927). J. State Med. 35, 595.Google Scholar
Hasty, F. E. (1927). J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 89, 507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hope, C. W. M. (1914). J. Laryng. 24, 507.Google Scholar
Jäger, (1892). Zeitschr. f. Hyg. u. Infectionsk. 12, 525 (quoted by Manheimer).Google Scholar
Klein, and Schultz, (1898). Wien. med. Wochenschr. 6, 238 (quoted by Manheimer).Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. W. (1921). Lancet, ii, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallman, W. L. (1928). Amer. J. Publ. Health, 18, 771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manheimer, W. A. (1914). J. Infect. Dis. 15, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, D. (1921). Lancet, ii, 585, 779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfuhl, (1888). Deutsche med. Wochenschr. 17, 9 (quoted by Manheimer).Google Scholar
Rankin, C. D. (1912). An Epidemic of Molluscum contagiosum, Thesis, Glasgow.Google Scholar
Reece, R. J. (1908-1909). Local Government Board Reports.Google Scholar
Report of the Joint Committee on Bathing Places of the American Public Health Association (1926). Amer. J. Publ. Health, 16, 1200.Google Scholar
Schultz, (1899). Berlin. klin. Wochenschr. 39, 36.Google Scholar
Skutsch, (1892). Centralbl. f. Bakt. 12, 309.Google Scholar
Suchard, (1877). Rev. de la Suisse romande, 7, 675 (quoted by Lees, D. (1928), Edin. Med. J., Section of Obstetrics).Google Scholar