Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T03:20:45.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Porosity of, and bacterial invasion through, the shell of the hen's egg

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. B. Haines
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge and the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Low Temperature Research Station, Cambridge
T. Moran
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge and the Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Low Temperature Research Station, Cambridge
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. Histological methods show four layers in the intact shell of the hen's egg, namely, cuticle, spongy layer, mammillary layer, and inner shell membrane. Distinct channels or pores may be found in the spongy layer, but these tend to disappear in the mammillary layer in which only a network of much finer channels can be observed.

2. Viscometric measurements of the passage of water and air through the shell show that

(a) shells vary widely in their porosity, even when taken on successive days from the same hen;

(b) there is no correlation between porosity so determined and the number of pores counted by staining methods;

(c) the rate of flow is slower from the interior to the exterior than vice versa, and the pore count by staining methods also less on the inside than on the outside.

3. A rough correlation exists between porosity as determined viscometri-cally and the evaporation of water during storage.

4. If the temperature of the egg is higher than a fluid containing bacteria in which it is immersed, the latter are readily drawn through the shell by simple suction as the egg cools down, a point of great significance in the washing of eggs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1940

References

REFERENCES

Haines, R. B. (1939). Microbiology in the preservation of the hen's egg. Spec. Rep. Food Invest. Bd, Lond., no. 47.Google Scholar
Marshall, W. & Cruickshank, D. B. (1938). The function of the cuticle in relation to the porosity of the egg. J. agric. Sci. 28, 24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, T. & Hale, H. P. (1936). Physics of the hen's egg. I. Membranes in the egg. J. exp. Biol. 13, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar