Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T07:59:23.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Salmonella dublin infection of calves: use of small doses to simulate natural infection on the farm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2010

C. Wray  and
W. J. Sojka
C. Wray
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey
W. J. Sojka
Affiliation:
Central Veterinary Laboratory, New Haw, Weybridge, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Small numbers of Salmonella dublin were used to infect calves in an attempt to simulate natural infection on the farm.

Twenty calves were exposed to S. dublin by one or more of the following methods:

Sucking cows which were excreting S. dublin in their faeces (⋜ 102–105 organisms/g).

Housing on S. dublin contaminated bedding.

Drinking S. dublin contaminated water (102–104 organisms/ml). During this experiment some calves were given therapeutic doses of oxytetracycline.

After exposure the calves were examined for faecal excretion of S. dublin (in some instances mouth swabs and blood samples were also examined) and for clinical signs of illness. Most of the calves became infected with S. dublin but excretion was usually sporadic and the numbers of salmonellas excreted were small. No clinical signs of salmonellosis were observed by S. dublin was isolated from one calf at post-mortem.

Another six calves, dosed orally with either 106 or 108S. dublin, showed signs of mild illness and although three calves had diarrhoea excretion of salmonellas was intermittent. S. dublin was isolated from one of these calves at post-mortem.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 87 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 501 - 509
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

References

Aitken, M. M., Hughes, D. L., Jones, P. W., Hall, G. A. & Collis, K. A. (1978). Effects of intravenous Salmonella dublin on cattle at different stages of Fasciola hepatica infection. Journal of Comparative Pathology 88, 433.Google Scholar
DeJong, H. & Ekdahl, M. O. (1965). Salmonellosis in calves – the effect of dose rate and other factors on transmission. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 13, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, D. A., Oakley, G. A. & MacKenzie, J. A. (1977). Experimental Salmonella dublin infection in calves. Veterinary Record 101, 220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, E. A. (1965). Diseases of dairy cattle. Salmonella infection in cattle. Journal of Dairy Research 32, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. A. & Jones, P. W. (1978). A study of the susceptibility of cattle to oral infection by salmonellas contained in raw sewage sludge. Journal of Hygiene 80, 409.Google Scholar
Jones, P. W. (1980). Disease hazards associated with slurry disposal. British Veterinary Journal 136, 529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lander, K. P. & Gill, K. P. W. (1980). Experimental infection of the bovine udder with Campylobacter coli/jejuni. Journal of Hygiene 84, 421.Google Scholar
Nazer, A. H. K. & Osborne, A. D. (1977). Experimental Salmonella dublin infection in calves. British Veterinary Journal 133, 388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rankin, J. D. & Taylor, R. J. (1966). The estimation of doses of Salmonella typhimurium suitable for the experimental production of diseases in calves. Veterinary Record 78, 706.Google Scholar
Rankin, J. D. & Taylor, R. J. (1969). A study of some disease hazards which could be associated with the system of applying cattle slurry to pasture. Veterinary Record 85, 578.Google Scholar
Smith, H. Williams & Jones, J. E. T. (1967). Observations on experimental oral infection with Salmonella dublin in calves and Salmonella choleraesuis in pigs. Journal of Pathology and Bacteriology 93, 141.Google Scholar
Sojka, W. J., Thomson, P. D. & Hudson, E. B. (1974). Excretion of Salmonella dublin by adult bovine carriers. British Veterinary Journal 130, 482.Google Scholar
Taylor, R. J. & Burrows, M. R. (1971). The survival of Escherichia coli and Salmonella dublin in slurry on pasture and the infectivity of S. dublin for grazing calves. British Veterinary Journal 127, 536.Google Scholar
Wray, C. (1975). Survival and spread of pathogenic bacteria of veterinary importance within the environment. Veterinary Bulletin 45, 543.Google Scholar
Wray, C.Dawson, M., Afshar, A. & Lucas, M. (1981). Experimental Escherichia coli and rotavirus infection in lambs. Research in Veterinary Science 30, 379.Google Scholar
Wray, C., Morris, J. A. & Sojka, W. J. (1975). A comparison of indirect haemagglutination tests and serum aggluntination tests for the serological diagnosis of S. dublin infection in cattle. British Veterinary Journal 131, 727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wray, C. & Sojka, W. J. (1978). Experimental Salmonella typhimurium infection in calves. Research in Veterinary Science 25, 139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed