Skip to main content
×
×
Home

From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health

  • L. Salvador-Carulla (a1), S. Lukersmith (a1) and W. Sullivan (a2)
Abstract

Guideline methods to develop recommendations dedicate most effort around organising discovery and corroboration knowledge following the evidence-based medicine (EBM) framework. Guidelines typically use a single dimension of information, and generally discard contextual evidence and formal expert knowledge and consumer's experiences in the process. In recognition of the limitations of guidelines in complex cases, complex interventions and systems research, there has been significant effort to develop new tools, guides, resources and structures to use alongside EBM methods of guideline development. In addition to these advances, a new framework based on the philosophy of science is required. Guidelines should be defined as implementation decision support tools for improving the decision-making process in real-world practice and not only as a procedure to optimise the knowledge base of scientific discovery and corroboration. A shift from the model of the EBM pyramid of corroboration of evidence to the use of broader multi-domain perspective graphically depicted as ‘Greek temple’ could be considered. This model takes into account the different stages of scientific knowledge (discovery, corroboration and implementation), the sources of knowledge relevant to guideline development (experimental, observational, contextual, expert-based and experiential); their underlying inference mechanisms (deduction, induction, abduction, means-end inferences) and a more precise definition of evidence and related terms. The applicability of this broader approach is presented for the development of the Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Primary Care of People with Developmental Disabilities.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      From the EBM pyramid to the Greek temple: a new conceptual approach to Guidelines as implementation tools in mental health
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Address for correspondence: Professor Luis Salvador-Carulla, MD, Ph.D., Mental Health Policy Unit, Brain & Mind Centre, Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, 100 Mallett Street, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia. (Email: luis.salvador-carulla@sydney.edu.au)
References
Hide All
Alper, BS, Haynes, RB (2016). EBHC Pyramid 5.0 for accessing preappraised evidence and guidance. Evidence based Medicine 21, 123125.
Bertelli, MO, Munir, K, Harris, J, Salvador-Carulla, L (2016 a). Intellectual developmental disorders: reflections on the international consensus document for redefining. mental retardation-intellectual disability in ICD-11. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disability 10(1), 3658.
Bertelli, MO, Munir, K, Salvador-Carulla, L (2016 b). Fair is foul, and foul is fair: reframing neurodevelopmental disorders in the neurodevelopmental perspective. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. August 1 [Epub ahead of print].
Bingeman, E (2016). Evaluating normative epistemic frameworks in medicine: EBM and casuistic medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22(4), 490495.
Boyd, EA and Bero, LA (2006). Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 4. Managing conflicts of interests. Health Research Policy and Systems 4, 16.
Brouwers, M, Kho, ME, Browman, GP, Burgers, JS, Cluzeau, F, Feder, G, Fervers, B, Graham, ID, Grimshaw, J, Hanna, S, Littlejohns, P, Makarski, J, Zitzelsberger, L and for the AGREE Next Steps Consortium (2010). AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in healthcare. Canadian Medical Association Journal. Retrieved October 2016 from http://www.agreetrust.org/
Brouwers, MC, Makarski, J, Kastner, M, Hayden, L, Bhattacharyya, O and Team, G-MR (2015). The Guideline Implementability Decision Excellence Model (GUIDE-M): a mixed methods approach to create an international resource to advance the practice guideline field. Implementation Science 10, 36.
Charles, C, Gafni, A, Freeman, E (2011). The evidence-based medicine model of clinical practice: scientific teaching or belief-based preaching? Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17, 597605.
Cobigo, V, Ouellette-Kuntz, HMJ, Lake, JK, Wilton, AS (2013). Chapter 6: medication use. In Atlas on the Primary Care of Adults with Developmental Disabilities in Ontario (ed. Lunsky, Y Klein-Geltink, JE and Yates, EA), pp. 117136. Health Care Access Research and Developmental Disabilities (HCARDD). Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: Toronto, Ontario.
Damschroder, LJ, Aron, DC, Keith, RE, Kirsh, SR, Alexander, JA, Lowery, JC (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science 4, 50.
Deb, S, Unwin, G, Deb, T (2015). Characteristics and the trajectory of psychotropic medication use in general and antipsychotics in particular among adults with an intellectual disability who exhibit aggressive behaviour. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 59, 1125.
Doherty, S (2006). Evidence-based implementation of evidence-based guidelines. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance 19(1), 3241.
Durbin, J, Selick, A, Casson, I, Green, L, Spassiani, N, Perry, A, Lunsky, Y (2016). Evaluating the implementation of health checks for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in primary care: the importance of organizational context. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities 154, 136150.
Fernandez, A, Sturmberg, J, Lukersmith, S, Madden, R, Torkfar, G, Colagiuri, R, Salvador-Carulla, L (2015). Evidence-based medicine: is it a bridge too far? Health Research Policy and Systems 13(1), 66.
Fervers, B, Burgers, JS, Haugh, M, Latrelle, J, Milika-Cabanne, N, Paquet, L, Coulombe, M, Poirer, M and Burnand, B (2006). Adaptation of clinical guidelines: literature review and proposition for a framework and procedure. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 18(3), 167176.
Fleuren, MA, van Dommelen, P, Dunnink, T (2015). A systematic approach to implementing and evaluating clinical guidelines: the results of fifteen years of Preventive Child Health Care guidelines in the Netherlands. Social Science & Medicine 136–137, 3543.
Francke, AL, Smit, MC, de Veer, AJ, Mistiaen, P (2008). Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. BMC Medical Informatics Decision Making 8, 38.
Gagliardi, AR, Brouwers, MC, Palda, VA, Lemieux-Charles, L, Grimshaw, JM (2011). How can we improve guideline use? A conceptual framework of implementability. Implementation Science 6, 26.
Girlanda, F, Fiedler, I, Becker, T, Barbui, C, Koesters, M (2016). The evidence-practice gap in specialist mental healthcare: systematic review and meta-analysis of guideline implementation studies. British Journal of Psychiatry, July 21 [Epub ahead of print].
Goldet, G, Howick, J (2013). Understanding GRADE: an introduction. Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine 6(1), 5054.
Greenhalgh, T, Howick, J, Maskrey, N and G. Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance (2014). Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? British Medical Journal 348, g3725.
Greenhalgh, T, Snow, R, Ryan, S, Rees, S, Salisbury, H (2015). Six ‘biases’ against patients and carers in evidence-based medicine. Biomed Central Medicine 13, 200.
Grimshaw, J, Thomas, R, Maclennan, G, Fraser, C, Ramsay, C, Vale, L, Whitty, P, Eccles, M, Matowe, L, Shirran, L, Wensing, M, Dijkstra, R, Donaldson, C (2004). Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technology Assessment 8(6), iii–iv, 1–72.
Grol, R, Buchan, H (2006). Clinical guidelines what can we do to increase their use. Medical Journal of Australia 185(6), 301302.
Guideline International Network (GIN) (2015). GIN Public Toolkit: Patient and Public Involvement in Guidelines.
Guidelines International Network GIN (2016). International Guideline Library. Retrieved 29 August 2016 from http://www.g-i-n.net/library/international-guidelines-library
Guyatt, G (2010). The vexing problem of guidelines and conflicts of interest: a potential solution. Annals of Internal Medicine 152, 738741.
Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE, Kunz, R, Falck-Ytter, Y, Alonso-Coello, P, Schunemann, HJ, Group, GW (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336(7650), 924926.
Hakkennes, S, Dodd, K (2008). Guideline implementation in allied health professions: a systematic review of the literature. Quality & Safety in Health Care 17(4), 296300.
Hargreaves, MB (2010). Evaluating System Change: A Planning Guide. Methods Brief. Mathematica [Internet]. Retrieved October 2016 from http://www.mathematica-mpr.com/~/media/publications/PDFs/health/eval_system_change_methodbr.pdf.
Howick, J, Chalmers, I, Glasziou, P, Greenhalgh, T, Heneghan, C, Liberatir, A, Moschetti, I, Phillips, B, Thornton, H (2011). The 2011 Oxford CEBM Evidence Levels of Evidence (introductory document). [Internet]. Retrieved October 2016 from http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653
Huckel Schneider, C, Sturmber, J, Gillespie, J, Wilson, A, Lukersmith, S, S-CL (2016) (in press). Applying complex adaptive systems thinking to Australian healthcare; an expert commentary brokered by the Sax Institute for the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in health Care.
Institute of Medicine (2011). Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. N. A. Program: Washington, DC.
Ivers, NM, Grimshaw, JM (2016). Reducing research waster with implementation laboratories. The Lancet 388(August 6), 547548.
Kirk, M, Kelley, C, Yoankey, N, Birken, S, Abadie, B, Damschroder, LJ (2016). A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Implementation Science 11, 72.
Lukersmith, S, Hopman, K, Vine, K, Krahe, L, McColl, A (2016). A new framing approach in guideline development to manage different sources of knowledge. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. May 19 [Epub ahead of print].
Lunsky, Y, Klein-Geltink, JE, Yates, EA, Eds. (2013). Atlas on the Primary Care of Adults with Developmental Disabilities in Ontario. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: Toronto, Ontario.
Milev, RV, Giacobbe, P, Kennedy, SH, Blumberger, DM, Daskalakis, ZJ, Downar, J, Modirrousta, M, Patry, S, Vila-Rodriguez, F, Lam, RW, MacQueen, GM, Parikh, SV, Ravindran, AV and CANMAT Depression Work Group. Canadian Network for Mood and Anxiety Treatments (CANMAT) (2016). Clinical guidelines for the management of adults with major depressive disorder: section 4. Neurostimulation treatments. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 61(9), 561575.
Minhas, R (2007). Eminence-based guidelines: a quality assessment of the second Joint British Societies’ guidelines on the prevention of cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Clinical Practice 61, 11371144.
Mitchell, AP, Basch, E, Dusetzina, SJO (2016). Financial relationships with industry among National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline authors. JAMA Oncology. August 25 [Epub ahead of print].
National Health and Medical Research Council (2011). Procedures and requirements to meet the 2011 NHMRC standard for clinical practice guidelines. Retrieved July 2011 from http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/publications/attachments/cp133_nhmrc_procedures_requirements_guidelines_v1.1_120125.pdf
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2016). Developing NICE guidelines: the manual. Retrieved 26 August 2016 from https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg20/chapter/introduction-and-overview
Nilsen, E, Myrhaug, H, Johansen, M, Oliver, S, Oxman, A (2010). Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3(Art. No.: CD004563).
Ostuzzi, G, Bighelli, I, Carrara, B, Dusi, N, Imperadore, G, Lintas, C, Nifosi, F, Nose, M, Piazza, C, Purgato, M, Rizzo, R, Barbui, C (2013). Making the use of psychotropic drugs more rational through the development of GRADE recommendations in specialist mental healthcare. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 7, 14.
Ouellette-Kuntz, HMJ, Cobigo, V, Balogh, R, Wilton, AS, Lunsky, Y (2013). Chapter 4: Secondary prevention. In Atlas on the Primary Care of Adults with Developmental Disabilities in Ontario (ed. Lunksy, Y, Klein-Geltink, JE and Yates, EA), pp. 6591. Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences and Centre for Addiction and Mental Health: Toronto, Ontario.
Peters, D, Adam, T, Alonge, O, Akua Agyepong, I, Tran, N (2013). Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. British Medical Journal 347, f6753.
Qaseem, A, Forland, F, Macbeth, F, Ollenschlager, G, Phillips, S, van der Wees, P (2012). Guidelines international netwrok: towards international standards for clinical practice guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine 156, 525531.
Rabin, B, Brownson, R, Haire-Joshu, D, Kreuter, M, Weaver, N (2008). A glossary for dissemination and implementation research in health. Journal of Public Health Management Practice 14(2), 117123.
Rosner, AL (2012). Evidence-based medicine: revisiting the pyramid of priorities. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 16(1), 4249.
Salvador-Carulla, L, Symonds, S (2016). Health services use and costs in people with intellectual disability: building a context knowledge base for evidence-informed policy. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 29(2), 8994.
Salvador-Carulla, L, Garcia-Alonso, C, Gibert, K, Vazquez-Bourgon, J (2013). Incorporating local information and prior expert knowledge to evidence-informed mental health system research. In Improving Mental Health Care: The Global Challenge (ed. G Thornicroft, M Ruggeri and D Goldberg), pp. 211–228. John Wiley & Sons: London.
Salvador-Carulla, L, Fernandez, A, Madden, R, Lukersmith, S, Colagiuri, R, Torkfar, G, Sturmberg, J (2014). Framing of scientific knowledge as a new category of health care research. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 20(6), 10451055.
Schunemann, HJ, Fretheim, A, Oxman, AD (2006). Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 10. Integrating values and consumer involvement. Health Research Policy and Systems 4, 22.
Schurz, G (2014). Philosophy of Science New York Taylor & Francis.
Shiffman, R, Dixon, J, Brandt, C, Essaihi, A, Hsiao, A, Michel, G, O'Connell, R (2005). The GuideLine Implementability APpraisal (GLIA): development of an instrument to identify obstacles to guide implementation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 5, 23.
Shnier, A, Lexchin, J, Romero, M, Brown, K (2016). Reporting of financial conflicts of interest in clinical practice guidelines: a case study analysis of guidelines from the Canadian Medical Association Infobase. BMC Health Services Research 16(383).
Snilstveit, B, Oliver, S, Vojtkova, M (2012). Narrative approaches to systematic review and synthesis of evidence for international development policy and practice. Journal of Development Effectiveness 4(3), 409429.
Sturmberg, J, O'Halloran, DM, Martin, C (2010). People at the centre of complex adaptive health systems reform. Medical Journal of Australia 193(8), 474478.
Sullivan, W, Heng, J, Cameron, D, Lunsky, Y, Cheetham, T, Hennen, B, Bradley, E, Berg, J, Korossy, M, Forster-Gibson, C, Gitta, M, Stavrakaki, C, McCreary, B, Swift, I (2006). Consensus guidelines for primary health care of adults with developmental disabilities. Canadian Family Physician 52, 14101418.
Sullivan, W, Berg, J, Bradley, E, Cheetham, T, Denton, R, Heng, J, Hennen, B, Joyce, D, Kelly, M, Korossy, M, Lunsky, Y, McMillan, S (2011). Primary care of adults with developmental disabilities; Canadian Consensus Guidelines. Canadian Family Physician 57, 541553.
The ADAPTE Collaboration (2009). The ADAPTE Process: Resource Toolkit for Guideline Adaptation. [Internet]. Retreived October 2016 from http://www.g-i-n.net/
van Dulmen, SA, Lukersmith, S, Muxlow, J, Santa Mina, E, Nijhuis-van der Sanden, MW, van der Wees, PJ, GINAHS Group (2015). Supporting a person-centred approach in clinical guidelines. A position paper of the Allied Health Community – Guidelines International Network (G-I-N). Health Expectations 18(5), 15431558.
World Health Organization WHO (2012). WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. G. R. Committee. Geneva: WHO.
Yelovich, MC (2016). The patient-physician interaction as a meeting of experts: one solution to the problem of patient non-adherence. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 22(4), 558564.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
  • ISSN: 2045-7960
  • EISSN: 2045-7979
  • URL: /core/journals/epidemiology-and-psychiatric-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score