Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:48:10.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The impact of non-adherence to medication in patients with schizophrenia on health, social care and societal costs. Analysis of the QUATRO study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2013

D. King*
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
M. Knapp
Affiliation:
Personal Social Services Research Unit, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
A. Patel
Affiliation:
Centre for the Economics of Mental and Physical Health, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK
F. Amaddeo
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy
M. Tansella
Affiliation:
Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, Department of Medicine and Public Health, University of Verona, Italy
A. Schene
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M. Koeter
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
M. Angermeyer
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
T. Becker
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry II, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany Bezirkskrankenhaus Guenzburg, Guenzburg, Germany
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr D. King, Personal Social Services Research Unit, LSE Health and Social Care, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. (Email: d.king@lse.ac.uk)

Abstract

Aims.

For people with schizophrenia, non-adherence to antipsychotic medications may result in high use of health and other services. The objective of our research was to examine the economic consequences of non-adherence in patients with schizophrenia taking antipsychotic medication.

Methods.

Data were taken from QUATRO, a randomized controlled trial that drew a sample of adults with schizophrenia receiving psychiatric services in four European cities: Amsterdam, Leipzig, London and Verona. Trial inclusion criteria were a clinical diagnosis of schizophrenia, requiring on-going antipsychotic medication for at least 1-year following baseline assessment, and exhibiting evidence of clinical instability in the year prior to baseline. The patient-completed Medication Adherence Questionnaire (MAQ) was used to calculate the 5-point Morisky index of adherence. Generalized linear models (GLM) were developed to determine the effect of adherence on (i) health and social care and (ii) societal costs before and after treatment, taking into account other potential cost-influencing factors.

Results.

The effect of non-adherence on costs was mixed. For different groups of services, and according to treatment group assignment, non-adherence was both negatively and positively associated with costs.

Conclusions.

The impact of non-adherence on costs varies across the types of services used by individuals with schizophrenia.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Becker, M, Young, M, Ochshorn, E, Diamond, R (2007). The relationship of antipsychotic medication class and adherence with treatment outcomes and costs for Florida Medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research 34, 307314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beecham, J, Knapp, M (1992). Costing psychiatric interventions. In Measuring Mental Health Needs (ed. Thormicroft, G., Brewin, C. and Wing, J.), pp. 163183. Gaskell: London.Google Scholar
Byerly, M, Fisher, R, Whatley, K, Holland, R, Varghese, F, Carmody, T, Magouirk, B, Rush, A (2005). A comparison of electronic monitoring vs. clinical rating of antipsychotic adherence in outpatients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research 133, 129133.Google Scholar
Chisholm, D, Knapp, M, Knudsen, H, Amaddeo, F, Gaite, L, van Wijngaarden, B (2000). Client socio-demographic and service receipt inventory – European version: development of an instrument for international research. EPSILON Study 5. European psychiatric services: inputs linked to outcome domains and needs. British Journal of Psychiatry 177, S28S33.Google Scholar
Day, J, Bentall, R, Roberts, C, Randall, F, Rogers, A, Cattell, D, Healy, D, Rae, P, Power, C (2005). Attitudes towards antipsychotic medication: the impact of clinical variables and relationships with health professionals. Archives of General Psychiatry 62, 717724.Google Scholar
Gilmer, T, Dolder, C, Lacro, J, Folsom, D, Lindamer, L, Garcia, P, Jeste, D (2004). Adherence to treatment with antipsychotic medication and health care costs among medicaid beneficiaries with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry 161, 692699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, R, Leese, M, Bindman, J, Becker, T, Burti, L, David, A, Gournay, K, Kikkert, M, Koeter, M, Puschner, B, Schene, A, Thormicroft, G, Tansella, M (2006). Adherence therapy for people with schizophrenia – European multicentre randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 189, 508514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gray, R, Marshall, M, Lockwood, A, Morris, J (1997). Problems in conducting economic evaluations alongside clinical trials – lessons from a study of case management for people with mental disorders. British Journal of Psychiatry 170, 4752.Google Scholar
Heider, D, Bernert, S, Konig, H-H, Matschinger, H, Hogh, T, Brugha, T, Bebbington, P, Azorin, M, Angermeyer, M, Toumi, M (2009). Direct medical mental health care costs of schizophrenia in France, Germany and the United Kingdom – findings from the European Schizophrenia Cohort (EuroSC). European Psychiatry 24, 216224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kampman, O, Lehtinen, K (1999). Compliance in psychoses. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 100, 167175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, M, King, D, Pugner, K, Lapuerta, P (2004 a). Non-adherence to antipsychotic medication regimens: associations with resource use and costs. British Journal of Psychiatry 184, 509516.Google Scholar
Knapp, M, Mangalore, R, Simon, J (2004 b). The global cost of schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 30, 279293.Google Scholar
Kuipers, E (1996). The management of difficult to treat patients with schizophrenia, using non-drug therapies. British Journal of Psychiatry 169, 4151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacro, J, Dunn, L, Dolder, C, Leckband, R, Jeste, D (2002). Prevalence of and risk factors for medication nonadherence in patients with schizophrenia: a comprehensive review of recent literature. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 63, 892909.Google Scholar
Lukoff, D, Liberman, R, Neuchterlein, K (1986). Symptoms monitoring in the rehabilitation of schizophrenic patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin 12, 578602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCrone, P (2011). Mental health economics: current methodological issues. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 20, 239243.Google Scholar
Menard, S (2002). Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. Sage University Press: Thousand Oaks, CA.Google Scholar
Morisky, D, Green, L, Levine, D (1986). Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Medical Care 24, 6774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mullahy, J (1998). Much ado about two: reconsidering retransformation and the two-part model in health economics. Journal of Health Economics 17, 247281.Google Scholar
Nosè, M, Barbui, C, Tansella, M (2003). How often do patients with psychosis fail to adhere to treatment programmes? A systematic review. Psychological Medicine 33, 11491160.Google Scholar
Patel, A (2006). Issues in Multi-national Health Economic Evaluation. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, University of London: London.Google Scholar
Patel, A, McCrone, P, Knapp, M, Leese, M, Amaddeo, F, Tansella, M, Kilian, R, Angermeyer, M, Kikkert, M, Schene, A. Economic evaluation of adherence therapy compared to a health education intervention for people with schizophrenia. Cost-Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (Forthcoming).Google Scholar
Shalansky, S (2004). Self-reported Morisky score for identifying nonadherence with cardiovascular medications. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38, 13631368.Google Scholar
STATA (2001). STATA 10.1. Stata Corporation: College Station, TX.Google Scholar
Svarstad, B, Shireman, T, Sweeney, J (2001). Using drug claims data to assess the relationship of medication adherence with hospitalization and costs. Psychiatric Services 52, 805811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, K, Kulkarni, J, Sergejew, A (2000). Reliability and validity of a new Medication Adherence Rating Scale (MARS) for the psychoses. Schizophrenia Research 42, 241247.Google Scholar
Velligan, D, Lam, Y-W, Glahn, D, Barrett, J, Maples, N, Ereshefsky, L, Miller, A (2006). Defining and assessing adherence to oral antipsychotics: a review of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32, 724742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ventura, J, Green, M, Shaner, A, Liberman, R (1993). Training and quality assurance with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. The ‘drift busters’. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research 3, 221244.Google Scholar
Ware, J, Sherbourn, C (1992). The MOS, 36 item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). I, Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 30, 473483.Google Scholar
Weiden, P, Kozma, C, Grogg, A, Locklear, J (2004 a). Partial compliance and risk of rehospitalization among California medicaid patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services 55, 886891.Google Scholar
Weiden, P, Mackell, J, McDonnell, D (2004 b). Obesity as a risk factor for antipsychotic noncompliance. Schizophrenia Research 66, 5157.Google Scholar