Agrest, Martín Barruti, Silvina Gabriel, Raquel Zalazar, Virginia Wikinski, Silvia and Ardila-Gómez, Sara 2017. Day hospital treatment for people with severe mental illness according to users’ perspectives: what helps and what hinders recovery?. Journal of Mental Health, p. 1.
Cavelti, M. Wirtz, M. Corrigan, P. and Vauth, R. 2017. Recovery assessment scale: Examining the factor structure of the German version (RAS-G) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. European Psychiatry, Vol. 41, p. 60.
Moljord, I.E.O. Lara-Cabrera, M.L. Salvesen, Ø. Rise, M.B. Bjørgen, D. Antonsen, D.Ø. Olsø, T.M. Evensen, G.H. Gudde, C.B Linaker, O.M. Steinsbekk, A. and Eriksen, L. 2017. Twelve months effect of self-referral to inpatient treatment on patient activation, recovery, symptoms and functioning: A randomized controlled study. Patient Education and Counseling,
Tremblay, Carolane Coulombe, Valérie and Briand, Catherine 2017. Users’ involvement in mental health services: programme logic model of an innovative initiative in integrated care. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, Vol. 11, Issue. 1,
Anderson Clarke, Lynne M. and Warner, Barbara 2016. Exploring Recovery Perspectives in Individuals Diagnosed with Mental Illness. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, Vol. 32, Issue. 4, p. 400.
Bär Deucher, A. Hengartner, M.P. Kawohl, W. Konrad, J. Puschner, B. Clarke, E. Slade, M. Del Vecchio, V. Sampogna, G. Égerházi, A. Süveges, Á. Krogsgaard Bording, M. Munk-Jørgensen, P. and Rössler, W. 2016. Participation in medical decision-making across Europe: An international longitudinal multicenter study. European Psychiatry, Vol. 35, p. 39.
Biringer, Eva Davidson, Larry Sundfør, Bengt Lier, Haldis Ø. and Borg, Marit 2016. Coping with mental health issues: subjective experiences of self-help and helpful contextual factors at the start of mental health treatment. Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 23.
Biringer, Eva Davidson, Larry Sundfør, Bengt Ruud, Torleif and Borg, Marit 2016. Service users’ expectations of treatment and support at the Community Mental Health Centre in their recovery. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences,
Biringer, Eva Davidson, Larry Sundfør, Bengt Ruud, Torleif and Borg, Marit 2016. Experiences of support in working toward personal recovery goals: a collaborative, qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,
Bjornestad, Jone Bronnick, Kolbjorn Davidson, Larry Hegelstad, Wenche ten Velden Joa, Inge Kandal, Oyvind Larsen, Tor Ketil Langeveld, Johannes Veseth, Marius Melle, Ingrid and Johannessen, Jan Olav 2016. The central role of self-agency in clinical recovery from first episode psychosis. Psychosis, p. 1.
Cavelti, Marialuisa Homan, Philipp and Vauth, Roland 2016. The impact of thought disorder on therapeutic alliance and personal recovery in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: An exploratory study. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 239, p. 92.
Cleary, Michelle Lees, David Escott, Phil and Molloy, Luke 2016. Leadership and mental health recovery: Rhetoric or reality. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 267.
de Jager, Adèle Rhodes, Paul Beavan, Vanessa Holmes, Douglas McCabe, Kathryn Thomas, Neil McCarthy-Jones, Simon Lampshire, Debra and Hayward, Mark 2016. Investigating the Lived Experience of Recovery in People Who Hear Voices. Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 26, Issue. 10, p. 1409.
Enticott, Joanne C. Shawyer, Frances Brophy, Lisa Russell, Grant Fossey, Ellie Inder, Brett Mazza, Danielle Vasi, Shiva Weller, Penelope June Wilson-Evered, Elisabeth Edan, Vrinda and Meadows, Graham 2016. The PULSAR primary care protocol: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial to test a training intervention for general practitioners in recovery-oriented practice to optimize personal recovery in adult patients. BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 16, Issue. 1,
Gullslett, Monika K. Kim, Hesook Suzie Andersen, Anders J. W. and Borg, Marit 2016. “Emotional Darkness without Solutions”: Subjective Experiences of Mental Health Crisis. International Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 45, Issue. 3, p. 161.
Haskell, Rebecca Graham, Kathryn Bernards, Sharon Flynn, Andrea and Wells, Samantha 2016. Service user and family member perspectives on services for mental health, substance use/addiction, and violence: a qualitative study of their goals, experiences and recommendations. International Journal of Mental Health Systems, Vol. 10, Issue. 1,
Hesamzadeh, Ali Dalvandi, Asghar Bagher Maddah, Sadat Fallahi Khoshknab, Masoud and Ahmadi, Fazlollah 2016. Family Caregivers’ Experiences of Stroke Recovery Among Older Adults Living in Iran: A Qualitative Study. Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, Vol. In Press, Issue. In Press,
Hickey, J. E. Pryjmachuk, S. and Waterman, H. 2016. Exploring personal recovery in mental illness through an Arabic sociocultural lens. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing,
McCaffrey, Tríona and Edwards, Jane 2016. “Music Therapy Helped Me Get BackDoing”: Perspectives of Music Therapy Participants in Mental Health Services. Journal of Music Therapy, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 121.
Nowak, Izabela Waszkiewicz, Justyna Świtaj, Piotr Sokół-Szawłowska, Marlena and Anczewska, Marta 2016. A Qualitative Study of the Subjective Appraisal of Recovery Among People with Lived Experience of Schizophrenia in Poland. Psychiatric Quarterly,
Mental health policy internationally varies in its support for recovery. The aims of this study were to validate an existing conceptual framework and then characterise by country the distribution, scientific foundations and emphasis in published recovery conceptualisations.
Update and modification of a previously published systematic review and narrative synthesis of recovery conceptualisations published in English.
A total of 7431 studies were identified and 429 full papers reviewed, from which 105 conceptualisations in 115 papers were included and quality assessed using established rating scales. Recovery conceptualisations were identified from 11 individual countries, with 95 (91%) published in English-speaking countries, primarily the USA (47%) and the UK (25%). The scientific foundation was primarily qualitative research (53%), non-systematic literature reviews (24%) and position papers (12%). The conceptual framework was validated with the 18 new papers. Across the different countries, there was a relatively similar distribution of codings for each of five key recovery processes.
Recovery as currently conceptualised in English-language publications is primarily based on qualitative studies and position papers from English-speaking countries. The conceptual framework was valid, but the development of recovery conceptualisations using a broader range of research designs within other cultures and non-majority populations is a research priority.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.