Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effects of manipulative therapy on the longissimus dorsi in the equine back

  • James M Wakeling (a1), Kate Barnett (a1), Sarah Price (a1) and Kathryn Nankervis (a2)

Abstract

Pain, atrophy and dysfunction of the longissimus dorsi in the equine back can lead to poor performance and altered biomechanics. Back problems are often treated by manipulative therapy to this muscle. The purpose of this study was to identify if manipulative therapy resulted in changes to muscle tone or electromyographic (EMG) activity immediately after treatment. We measured the muscle tone during standing using a mechanical tissue indenter and the EMG activity (both at the T16 level in the longissimus dorsi) during walking around a figure-of-eight course in 26 horses. The horses were randomly assigned into three groups that received: (a) spinal (McTimoney) manipulations, (b) reflex inhibition therapy or (c) a control group that was not manipulated. The muscle tone and activity were measured immediately after treatment. Both the McTimoney and the reflex inhibition groups showed significant decreases in muscle tone (c. 12%) and walking EMG activity (c. 19%). The control group showed no significant change in tone or EMG activity. These results document how the longissimus dorsi muscle responds immediately after manipulative therapy. Further studies would be needed to identify how long such changes persist or if such changes caused a reduction in pain or an increase in performance.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: jwakeling@rvc.ac.uk

References

Hide All
1Ridgeway, K and Harman, J (1999). Equine back rehabilitation. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 15: 263280.
2Valberg, SJ (1999). Spinal muscle pathology. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 15: 8796.
3Wennerstrand, J, Johnston, C, Roethlisberger-Holm, K, Erichsen, C, Eksell, P and Drevemo, S (2004). Kinematic evaluation of the back in the sport horse with back pain. Equine Veterinary Journal 36: 707711.
4Jeffcott, LB, Dalin, G, Drevemo, S, Fredricson, I, Björne, K and Bergquist, A (1982). Effect of induced back pain on gait and performance of trotting horses. Equine Veterinary Journal 14: 129133.
5Jeffcott, LB, Rossdale, PD, Freestone, J, Frank, CJ and Towers-Clark, PF (1982). An assessment of wastage in Thoroughbred racing from conception to 4 years of age. Equine Veterinary Journal 14: 185198.
6Jeffcott, LB (1979). Back problems in the horse – A look at past, present and future progress. Equine Veterinary Journal 11: 129136.
7Jeffcott, LB and Dalin, G (1980). Natural rigidity of the horse's backbone. Equine Veterinary Journal 12: 101108.
8Faber, MJ, Van Weeren, PR, Schepers, M and Barneveld, A (2003). Long-term follow-up of manipulative treatment in a horse with back problems. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. A, Physiology, Pathology, Clinical Medicine 50: 241245.
9Haussler, KK (1999). Back problems. Chiropractic evaluation and management. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Equine Practice 15: 195209.
10Herrod-Taylor, EE (1967). A technique for manipulation of the spine in horses. Veterinary Record 81: 437439.
11Fryer, G, Morris, T and Gibbons, P (2004). Paraspinal muscles and intervertebral dysfunction: Part one. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 27: 267274.
12Herzog, W, Scheele, D and Conway, PJ (1999). Electromyographic responses of back and limb muscles associated with spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 24: 146153.
13Colloca, CJ and Keller, TS (2001). Electromyographic reflex responses to mechanical force, manually assisted spinal manipulative therapy. Spine 26: 11171124.
14Dishman, JD and Bulbulian, R (2001). Comparison of effects of spinal manipulation and massage on motorneuron excitability. Electromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology 41: 97106.
15Dishman, JD and Burke, J (2003). Spinal reflex excitability changes after cervical and lumbar manipulation: A comparative study. Spine 3: 204212.
16Crawford, JP (1999). Chiropractic intervention in the treatment of joint and soft tissue disorders. Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology 24: 279289.
17Colborne, GR, McDonald, C, Barrett, A, Targett, S, Fuller, CJ, Targett, S and Fuller, CJ (2004). Effect of reflex inhibition technique for muscular back pain. Equine and Comparative Exercise Physiology 1(2): A8.
18Drake, JDM and Callaghan, JP (2006). Elimination of electrocardiogram contamination from electromyogram signals: An evaluation of currently used removal techniques. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 16: 175187.
19von Tscharner, V (2000). Intensity analysis in time-frequency space of surface myoelectric signals by wavelets of specified resolution. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 10: 433445.
20Wakeling, JM, Kaya, M, Temple, GK and Johnston, IA (2002). Determining patterns of motor recruitment during locomotion. Journal of Experimental Biology 205: 359369.
21Ashina, M, Bendsten, L, Jensen, R, Sakai, F and Olesen, J (1998). Measurement of muscle hardness: A methodological study. Cephalalgia 18: 106111.
22Kawchuk, G and Herzog, W (1996). A new technique of tissue stiffness (compliance) assessment: Its reliability, accuracy and comparison with an existing method. Journal of Manipulative Therapy 19: 1318.
23Licka, TF, Peham, C and Frey, A (2004). Electromyographic activity of the longissimus dorsi muscles in horses during trotting on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research 65: 155158.
24Peham, C, Frey, C, Licka, A and Scheidl, M (2001). Evaluation of the EMG activity of the long back muscle during induced back movements at stance. Equine Veterinary Journal Suppliment 33: 165168.
25Peham, C, Licka, TF and Scheidl, M (2001). Evaluation of a signal-adapted filter for processing of periodic electromyography signals in horses walking on a treadmill. American Journal of Veterinary Research 62: 16871689.

Keywords

Effects of manipulative therapy on the longissimus dorsi in the equine back

  • James M Wakeling (a1), Kate Barnett (a1), Sarah Price (a1) and Kathryn Nankervis (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed