Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T08:52:47.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of automatic histogram constructions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2009

Laurie Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University Duisburg-Essen; Department of Mathematics, Technical University Eindhoven, Germany.
Ursula Gather
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany; gather@statistik.uni.dortmund.de
Dan Nordman
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Iowa State University, USA.
Henrike Weinert
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics, Technische Universität Dortmund, Germany.
Get access

Abstract

Even for a well-trained statistician the construction of a histogramfor a given real-valued data set is a difficult problem. It is evenmore difficult to construct a fully automatic procedure whichspecifies the number and widths of the bins in a satisfactory mannerfor a wide range of data sets. In this paper we compare severalhistogram construction procedures by means of a simulationstudy. The study includes plug-in methods, cross-validation,penalized maximum likelihood and the taut string procedure. Their performance on different test beds is measured by their ability to identify the peaks of an underlying density as well as by Hellinger distance.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences, SMAI, 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable