Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Gözen Ercan, Pınar 2016. Debating the Future of the ‘Responsibility to Protect’.


    Radice, Henry 2016. The responsibility to protect as humanitarian negotiation: A space for the ‘politics of humanity’?. International Politics, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 101.


    Reykers, Yf and Smeets, Niels 2015. Losing control: a principal-agent analysis of Russia in the United Nations Security Council's decision-making towards the Libya crisis. East European Politics, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 369.


    DUNN, ELIZABETH CULLEN and BOBICK, MICHAEL S. 2014. The empire strikes back: War without war and occupation without occupation in the Russian sphere of influence. American Ethnologist, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 405.


    Junk, Julian 2014. The two-level politics of support—US foreign policy and the responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 535.


    Rotmann, Philipp Kurtz, Gerrit and Brockmeier, Sarah 2014. Major powers and the contested evolution of a responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 355.


    Warren, Aiden and Bode, Ingvild 2014. Governing the Use-of-Force in International Relations.


    Wilson, Gary 2014. Applying the Responsibility to Protect to the ‘Arab Spring’. Liverpool Law Review, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 157.


    Brommesson, Douglas and Fernros, Henrik Friberg 2013. The feasibility of an expanded regime on the use of force: the case of the responsibility to protect. Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 16, Issue. 1, p. 138.


    Friberg-Fernros, Henrik and Brommesson, Douglas 2013. The responsibility to protect – An incoherent doctrine?. International Politics, Vol. 50, Issue. 4, p. 600.


    Hehir, Aidan 2013. The Permanence of Inconsistency: Libya, the Security Council, and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, Vol. 38, Issue. 1, p. 137.


    Dunne, Tim and Gifkins, Jess 2011. Libya and the state of intervention. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 65, Issue. 5, p. 515.


    Welsh, Jennifer 2011. Civilian Protection in Libya: Putting Coercion and Controversy Back into RtoP. Ethics & International Affairs, Vol. 25, Issue. 03, p. 255.


    ×

“Leading from Behind”: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention after Libya

Abstract

Humanitarian intervention has always been more popular in theory than in practice. In the face of unspeakable acts, the desire to do something, anything, is understandable. States have tended to be reluctant to act on such desires, however, leading to the present situation in which there are scores of books and countless articles articulating the contours of a right—or even an obligation—of humanitarian intervention, while the number of cases that might be cited as models of what is being advocated can be counted on one hand.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bruno Simma , “NATO, the UN and the Use of Force: Legal Aspects,” European Journal of International Law 10 (1999)

Antonios Tzanakopoulos , Disobeying the Security Council: Countermeasures Against Wrongful Sanctions (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ethics & International Affairs
  • ISSN: 0892-6794
  • EISSN: 1747-7093
  • URL: /core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×