Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 23
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Aning, Kwesi and Edu-Afful, Fiifi 2016. African Agency in R2P: Interventions by African Union and ECOWAS in Mali, Cote D’ivoire, and Libya. International Studies Review, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 120.


    Cochrane, Alasdair and Cooke, Steve 2016. ‘Humane intervention’: the international protection of animal rights. Journal of Global Ethics, Vol. 12, Issue. 1, p. 106.


    Davies, Graeme A M and Johns, Robert 2016. R2P from below: Does the British public view humanitarian interventions as ethical and effective?. International Politics, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 118.


    Deyermond, Ruth 2016. The Uses of Sovereignty in Twenty-first Century Russian Foreign Policy. Europe-Asia Studies, p. 1.


    Falk, Barbara J. and Skinner, Sara M. 2016. The Responsibility to Protect: A Normative Shift from Words to Action?. International Peacekeeping, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 493.


    Fung, Courtney J. 2016. Global South solidarity? China, regional organisations and intervention in the Libyan and Syrian civil wars. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 33.


    Gallagher, Adrian and Brown, Garrett W 2016. The Responsibility to Protect 10 years on from the World Summit: A victory for common humanity?. International Politics, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 8.


    Lee, Pak K. and Chan, Lai-Ha 2016. China's and India's perspectives on military intervention: why Africa but not Syria?. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 70, Issue. 2, p. 179.


    Papamichail, Andeas and Partis-Jennings, Hannah 2016. Why common humanity? Framing the responsibility to protect as a common response. International Politics, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 83.


    Piiparinen, Touko 2016. The Interventionist Turn of UN Peacekeeping: New Western Politics of Protection or Bureaucratic Mission Creep?. Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 98.


    Radice, Henry 2016. The responsibility to protect as humanitarian negotiation: A space for the ‘politics of humanity’?. International Politics, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 101.


    Ramopoulos, Thomas 2015. The Responsibility to Protect and the Third Pillar.


    Reykers, Yf and Smeets, Niels 2015. Losing control: a principal-agent analysis of Russia in the United Nations Security Council's decision-making towards the Libya crisis. East European Politics, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 369.


    Brockmeier, Sarah Kurtz, Gerrit and Junk, Julian 2014. Emerging norm and rhetorical tool: Europe and a responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 429.


    BRUNSTETTER, DANIEL R. 2014. Trends in just war thinking during the US presidential debates 2000–12: genocide prevention and the renewed salience of last resort. Review of International Studies, Vol. 40, Issue. 01, p. 77.


    Junk, Julian 2014. The two-level politics of support—US foreign policy and the responsibility to protect. Conflict, Security & Development, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 535.


    Kersavage, Kathryn 2014. The “responsibility to protect” our answer to “never again”? Libya, Syria and a critical analysis of R2P. International Affairs Forum, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 23.


    Ziegler, Charles E. 2014. Contesting the Responsibility to Protect. International Studies Perspectives, p. n/a.


    Meiches, Benjamin 2013. The Responsibility to Protect and luxurious war. Critical Studies on Security, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 219.


    Rashid, Sid 2013. Preventive diplomacy, mediation and the responsibility to protect in Libya: a missed opportunity for Canada?. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, Vol. 19, Issue. 1, p. 39.


    ×

Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: The Exception and the Norm

Abstract

The Responsibility to Protect (RtoP) played an important role in shaping the world's response to actual and threatened atrocities in Libya. Not least, the adoption of Resolution 1973 by the UN Security Council on May 17, 2011, approving a no-fly zone over Libya and calling for “all necessary measures” to protect civilians, reflected a change in the Council's attitude toward the use of force for human protection purposes; and the role played by the UN's new Joint Office on the Prevention of Genocide and the Responsibility to Protect points toward the potential for this new capacity to identify threats of mass atrocities and to focus the UN's attention on preventing them. Given the reluctance of both the Security Council and the wider UN membership even to discuss RtoP in the years immediately following the 2005 World Summit—the High-level Plenary Meeting of the 60th Session of the General Assembly that gave birth to RtoP—these two facts suggest that significant progress has been made thanks to the astute stewardship of UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, who is personally committed to the principle. Where it was once a term of art employed by a handful of like-minded countries, activists, and scholars, but regarded with suspicion by much of the rest of the world, RtoP has become a commonly accepted frame of reference for preventing and responding to mass atrocities.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Paul D. Williams , “Into the Mogadishu Maelstrom: The African Union Mission in Somalia,” International Peacekeeping 16, no. 4 (2009), pp. 514–30

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ethics & International Affairs
  • ISSN: 0892-6794
  • EISSN: 1747-7093
  • URL: /core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×