Skip to main content
×
×
Home

RtoP Alive and Well after Libya

  • Thomas G. Weiss
Extract

With the exception of Raphael Lemkin's efforts on behalf of the 1948 Genocide Convention, no idea has moved faster in the international normative arena than “the responsibility to protect” (RtoP), which was formulated in 2001 by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). Friends and foes have pointed to the commission's conceptual contribution to reframing sovereignty as contingent rather than absolute, and to establishing a framework for forestalling or stopping mass atrocities via a three-pronged responsibility—to prevent, to react, and to rebuild. But until the international military action against Libya in March 2011, the sharp end of the RtoP stick—the use of military force—had been replaced by evasiveness and skittishness from diplomats, scholars, and policy analysts.

Copyright
References
Hide All

NOTES

1 International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001). See also Weiss, Thomas G. and Hubert, Don, The Responsibility to Protect: Research, Bibliography, Background (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).

2 See Barnett, Michael and Weiss, Thomas G., Humanitarianism Contested: Where Angels Fear to Tread (London: Routledge, 2011).

3 See Kuperman, Alan J., “Mitigating the Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from Economics,” Global Governance 14, no. 2 (2008), pp. 219–40;Kuperman, Alan J., “The Moral Hazard of Humanitarian Intervention: Lessons from the Balkans,” International Studies Quarterly 52 (2008), pp. 4980; and Kuperman, Alan J., “Darfur: Strategic Victimhood Strikes Again?Genocide Studies and Prevention 4, no. 3 (2009), pp. 281303.

4 The author's version is Weiss, Thomas G., Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas in Action (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2007).

5 Ban Ki-moon, “Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Report from the Secretary-General,” UN document A/63/677, January 12, 2009.

6 Ban Ki-moon, “Early Warning, Assessment and the Responsibility to Protect: Report of the Secretary-General,” UN document A/64/864, July 14, 2010.

7 Bellamy, Alex J., “The Responsibility to Protect—Five Years On,” Ethics & International Affairs 24, no. 2 (2010), p. 166.

8 I. William Zartman, “Preventing Identity Conflicts Leading to Genocide and Mass Killings,” International Peace Institute, 2010, p. 4.

9 Pattison, James, Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), p. 250, emphasis in original.

10 Akonor, Kwame, “Assessing the African Union's Right of Humanitarian Intervention,Criminal Justice Ethics 29, no. 2 (2010), pp. 157–73.

11 Chesterman, Simon, “Hard Cases Make Bad Law: Law, Ethics, and Politics in Humanitarian Intervention,” in Lang, Anthony F. Jr., ed., Just Intervention (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2003), p. 54.

12 Welsh, Jennifer, “Implementing the Responsibility to Protect: Where Expectations Meet Reality,Ethics & International Affairs 24, no. 4 (2010), p. 428.

13 Chopra, Jarat and Weiss, Thomas G., “Sovereignty Is No Longer Sacrosanct: Codifying Humanitarian Intervention,” Ethics & International Affairs 6 (1992), pp. 95117.

14 See Thomas G. Weiss, “Politics, the UN, and Halting Mass Atrocities,” in Adam and Ernesto Verdeja, eds., The International Politics of Genocide (Boulder, Co.: Lynne Rienner, forthcoming).

15 Collinson, Sarah et al. , Realising Protection: The Uncertain Benefits of Civilian, Refugee and IDP Status (London: Overseas Development Institute, 2009), HPG Report 28, p. 3.

16 Bass, Gary J., Freedom's Battle: The Origins of Humanitarian Intervention (New York: Knopf, 2008), p. 382.

17 Mani, Rama and Weiss, Thomas G., eds., The Responsibility to Protect: Cultural Perspectives in the Global South (London: Routledge, 2011).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ethics & International Affairs
  • ISSN: 0892-6794
  • EISSN: 1747-7093
  • URL: /core/journals/ethics-and-international-affairs
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 58
Total number of PDF views: 850 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2036 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd September 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.