Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-mx8w7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-04T15:51:44.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Landtová, Holubec, and the Problem of an Uncooperative Court: Implications for the Preliminary Rulings Procedure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2014

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The ultra vires judgment of the Czech Constitutional Court in Holubec and its significance - Evolution and unfolding of Czechoslovak pension saga - Landtová judgment of the Court - Later developments and approaches of the various actors - Holubec as a revolt that did not take place - Broader structural implications for the preliminary ruling procedure and its reform - The functions of the preliminary rulings procedure - Atomisation of national judicial hierarchies and its consequences - Voice and representation before the Court - The role of governmental agent in proceedings before the Court - Law-making without representation - The position of constitutional courts in the European judicial system - When judicial cooperation turns uncooperative - Conceptualizing judicial non-cooperation and disobedience.

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press and the Authors 2014