This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
van den Brink, Ton
Democratic legitimation of EU economic governance: challenges and opportunities for European Legislatures.
Journal of European Integration,
National Parliaments and Constitutional Transformation in the EU -
C. Hefftler et al. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (Palgrave
D. Jančić (ed.), National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis (Oxford University Press
A. Jonsson Cornell and M. Goldoni (eds.), National and Regional Parliaments in the EU-Legislative Procedure Post Lisbon (Hart Publishing
N. Lupo and C. Fasone (eds.), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution (Hart Publishing
1Cf. Groen, A. and Christiansen, T., ‘National Parliaments in the European Union: Conceptual Choices in the European Union’s Constitutional debate’, in C. Hefftler et al. (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union (Palgrave2015) p. 43 at p. 50 ff.
3Buzogány, A., ‘Learning from the Best? Interparliamentary networks and the parliamentary scrutiny of EU decision-making’, in B. Crum and J.E. Fossum (eds.), Practices of Inter-Parliamentary Coordination in International Politics: The European Union and Beyond (ECPR Press2013) p. 17.
4Auel, K., ‘Able and Willing? Early Warning System and Political Dialogue in the Bundestag and Nationalrat’, in A. Jonsson Cornell and M. Goldoni (eds.), National and Regional Parliaments in the EU-Legislative Procedure Post Lisbon (Hart Publishing2017) p. 291 at p. 311.
5Cf. Besselink, L., ‘The Place of National Parliaments within the European Constitutional Order’, in N. Lupo and C. Fasone (eds.), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution (Hart Publishing2016) p. 23 at p. 24.
6 K. Auel et al. ‘Fighting Back? And, If So, How? Measuring Parliamentary Strength and Activity in EU Affairs’, in Hefftler et al., supra n. 1, p. 60 at p. 79 (Table 3.5).
7 O. Rozenberg and C. Hefftler, ‘Introduction’, in Hefftler et al., supra n. 1, p. 1.
8 C. Neuhold and J. Smith, ‘Conclusion: From “Latecomers” to “Policy Shapers”? – The role of national parliaments in the “post-Lisbon” Union’, in Hefftler et al., supra n. 1, p. 668 at p. 678 (Table 35.1).
9 A. Jonsson Cornell and M. Goldoni, ‘Introduction’, in Jonsson Cornell and Goldoni, supra n. 3, p. 1 at p. 4.
10 M. Goldoni and A. Jonsson Cornell, ‘The Trajectory of the Early Warning Mechanism’, in Jonsson Cornell and Goldoni supra n. 4, p. 335 at p. 353.
12 European Commission, Annual Report 2016 on Relations between the European Commission and National Parliaments, COM(2017) 601 final, Brussels, 30.6.2017.
13 Although the two earlier yellow cards have already been analysed elsewhere in the literature and the one on the posted workers directive is discussed in Jančić, D., ‘EU Law’s Grand Scheme on National Parliaments: The third yellow card on posted workers and the way forward’, in D. Jančić (ed.), National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis (Oxford University Press2017) p. 299.
14Fasone, C. and Lupo, N., ‘Introduction. Parliaments in the composite European constitution’, in N. Lupo and C. Fasone (eds.), Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Composite European Constitution (Hart Publishing2016) p. 1 at p. 7.
15 Fasone and Lupo, supra n. 14, p. 11.
16 For the sake of disclosure, I should note that the main antagonist here is the concept of an ‘EU Multilevel Parliamentary Field’ as it has been coined by John Erik Fossum and myself: Crum, B. and Fossum, J.E., ‘The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: a framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU’, 1European Political Science Review (2009) p. 249.
17 C. Fasone, ‘Ruling the (Dis-)Order of Interparliamentary Cooperation? The EU Speakers’ Conference’, in Lupo and Fasone, supra n. 14, p. 269.
18 I. Cooper, ‘The Emerging Order of Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Post-Lisbon EU’, in Jančić, supra n. 13, p. 227 at p. 236ff.
19 Fasone, supra n. 17, p. 288.
20 D. Fromage, ‘Standing Committees in Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Post-Lisbon Era: Towards the end of the European Affairs Committees’ predominance’, in Lupo and Fasone, supra n. 14, p. 113 at p. 129.
21 C. Fasone and N. Lupo, ‘Conclusion. Interparliamentary Cooperation in the Framework of a Euro-national Parliamentary System’, in Lupo and Fasone, supra n. 14, p. 345 at p. 358ff.
22 Auel, supra n. 4, p. 307.
23Christiansen, T. et al., ‘National Parliaments in the Post-Lisbon European Union: Bureaucratization rather than democratization?’, 12Comparative European Politics (2014) p. 121.
24 J. Tudela cited in D. Fromage, ‘Regional Parliaments and the Early Warning System: An assessment and some suggestions for reform’, in Jonsson Cornell and Goldoni, supra n. 4, p. 117 at p. 133.
25 Cooper, supra n. 18, p. 243ff.
26 A. Merkel, ‘Speech at the opening ceremony of the 61st academic year of the College of Europe in Bruges’, 2 November 2010, <www.coleurope.eu/speeches> visited 6 October 2017; C. Bickerton et al., ‘The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era’, 53 JCMS (2015) p. 703; Editorial ‘In Search of the Union Method’, 11 EuConst (2015) p. 425.
27 V. Schmidt, ‘The “new” EU Governance: “new” intergovernmentalism, “new” supranationalism plus “new” parliamentarism’, in A. Crespy (ed.), Issue on The EU Economic Governance, Cahiers du Cevipol/Brussels Working Papers, n° 5/2016. (Université Libre de Bruxelles) p. 5.
* Professor of Political Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.