Skip to main content

Comparison between the Datex-Ohmeda M-NMT® module and a force-displacement transducer for monitoring neuromuscular blockade

  • C. Motamed (a1), K. Kirov (a1), X. Combes (a1) and P. Duvaldestin (a1)


Background and objective: The Datex-Ohmeda neuromuscular transmission module (M-NMT)® is a new monitor that is part of the AS/3® anaesthesia monitor. It incorporates a mechanosensor, which is a piezoelectric polymer attached to the hand. The module was compared with a force transducer in 30 patients requiring neuromuscular blockade.

Methods: Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and propofol, and tracheal intubation was performed without muscle relaxants. Neuromuscular blockade was assessed by the test module on one arm and the force transducer on the other arm. When the response to train-of-four stimulation had been stable in both arms for 3 min, rocuronium 0.2 mg kg−1 was injected intravenously. During recovery from blockade, the train-of-four ratio was measured in 15 patients, and the ratio of response to double-burst stimulation in the other 15 patients. Data analysis was by difference plots.

Results: Both devices had acceptable coefficients of repeatability. The M-NMT® module was biased by +1.3% (upper limit of agreement 14.2%, lower limit −12.9%) for the recovery of the train-of-four ratio, and by +1.09% (17%, −16%) for the recovery of double-burst stimulation ratio.

Conclusions: The Datex-Ohmeda M-NMT® gives measurements that are repeatable and gives good enough correspondence with a force transducer that it can be used clinically to assess recovery of neuromuscular blockade, but the limits of agreement rule out research applications.

Corresponding author
Correspondence to: Cyrus Motamed, Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital Henri-Mondor, AP-HP et Université Paris XII, 51 Avenue Maréchal De Lattre de Tassigny, F-94010 Créteil, France. E-mail:; Tel: +33 1 49 81 23 83; Fax: +33 1 49 81 23 80
Hide All


Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 8: 307313.
Kern SE, Johnson JO, Westenskow DR, Orr JA. An effectiveness study of a new piezoelectric sensor for train of four measurement. Anesth Analg 1994; 78: 978982.
Kirkegaard H, May O. Double burst stimulation for monitoring profound neuromuscular blockade: a comparison with posttetanic count and train of four. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 1992; 43: 253257.
Jensen E, Viby Mogensen J, Bang U. The accelerograph: a new neuromuscular transmission monitor. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1988; 32: 4952.
Viby Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Erikson LI, et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1996; 40: 5974.
Merle JC, Jurczyk M, Dhonneur G, Ruggier R, Duvaldestin P. Onset of neuromuscular block is the same if the ipsilateral limb or contralateral limb to the injection site is used for monitoring. Br J Anaesth 1995; 74: 333334.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Anaesthesiology
  • ISSN: 0265-0215
  • EISSN: 1365-2346
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-anaesthesiology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Abstract views

Total abstract views: 187 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.