Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-747cfc64b6-dwt4q Total loading time: 0.612 Render date: 2021-06-15T17:18:35.060Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Re-conceptualizing centrality in social networks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2016

D. SCHOCH
Affiliation:
Departement of Computer & Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany emails: david.schoch@uni-konstanz.de, ulrik.brandes@uni-konstanz.de Graduate School of Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany
U. BRANDES
Affiliation:
Departement of Computer & Information Science, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany emails: david.schoch@uni-konstanz.de, ulrik.brandes@uni-konstanz.de Graduate School of Decision Sciences, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany

Abstract

In the social sciences, networks are used to represent relationships between social actors, be they individuals or aggregates. The structural importance of these actors is assessed in terms of centrality indices which are commonly defined as graph invariants. Many such indices have been proposed, but there is no unifying theory of centrality. Previous attempts at axiomatic characterization have been focused on particular indices, and the conceptual frameworks that have been proposed alternatively do not lend themselves to mathematical treatment.

We show that standard centrality indices, although seemingly distinct, can in fact be expressed in a common framework based on path algebras. Since, as a consequence, all of these indices preserve the neighbourhood-inclusion pre-order, the latter provides a conceptually clear criterion for the definition of centrality indices.

Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

Footnotes

We gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under grant Br 2158/6-1. Part of this research was presented at the SIAM Workshop on Network Science (Snowbird, Utah, May 2015).

References

[1] Batagelj, V. (1994) Semirings for social network analysis. J. Math. Sociol. 19 (1), 5368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Bavelas, A. (1948) A mathematical model for group structures. Human Organizations 7 (3), 1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Bavelas, A. (1950) Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 22 (6), 725730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Beauchamp, M. A. (1965) An improved index of centrality. Behav. Sci. 10, 161163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[5] Benzi, M. & Klymko, C. (2013) Total communicability as a centrality measure. J. Complex Netw. 1 (2), 124149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Bloch, F., Jackson, M. O. & Tebaldi, P. (2016) Centrality measures in networks. SSRN Electron. J.. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2749124.Google Scholar
[7] Boldi, P. & Vigna, S. (2014) Axioms for centrality. Internet Math. 10 (3–4), 222262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Bonacich, P. (1972) Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification. J. Math. Sociol. 2, 113120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Bonacich, P. (1987) Power and centrality: A family of measures. Am. J. Sociol. 92 (5), 11701182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Borgatti, S. P. (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc. Netw. 27 (1), 5571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K. M. & Krackhardt, D. (2006) On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Soc. Netw. 28 (2), 124136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Borgatti, S. P. & Everett, M. G. (2006) A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Soc. Netw. 28 (4), 466484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Johnson, J. C. (2013) Analyzing Social Networks. Sage, London.Google Scholar
[14] Botafogo, R. A., Rivlin, E. & Shneiderman, B. (1992) Structural analysis of hypertexts: Identifying hierarchies and useful metrics. ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. 10 (2), 142180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Brandes, U. (2016) Network positions. Methodological Innov. 9, 2059799116630650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Brandes, U. & Erlebach, T. (editors) (2005) Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3418, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Brandes, U., Robins, G., McCranie, A. & Wasserman, S. (2013) What is network science? Netw. Sci. 1 (1), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18] Costenbader, E. & Valente, T. W. (2003) The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Soc. Netw. 25 (4), 283307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Estrada, E. & Rodríguez-Velázquez, J. A. (2005) Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Phys. Rev. E 71 (5), 056103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[20] Foldes, S. & Hammer, P. L. (1978) The Dilworth number of a graph. Ann. Discrete Math. 2, 211219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21] Freeman, L. C. (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40 (1), 3541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Freeman, L. C. (1979) Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1 (3), 215239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[23] Freeman, L. C. (2004) The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science, Empirical Press, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
[24] Gondran, M. & Minoux, M. (2008) Graphs, Diods and Semirings. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
[25] Guimera, R., Mossa, S., Turtschi, A. & Nunes Amaral, L. A. (2005) The worldwide air transportation network: Anomalous centrality, community structure, and cities' global roles. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 102 (22), 77947799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[26] Hage, P. & Harary, F. (1995) Eccentricity and centrality in networks. Soc. Netw. 17, 5763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[27] Hennig, M., Brandes, U., Pfeffer, J. & Mergel, I. (2012) Studying Social Networks – A Guide to Empirical Research. Campus, Frankfurt/New York.Google Scholar
[28] Junker, B. H., Koschützki, D. & Schreiber, F. (2006) Exploration of biological network centralities with CentiBiN. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (219).Google Scholar
[29] Kadushin, C. (2011) Understanding Social Networks: Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
[30] Katz, L. (1953) A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18 (1), 3943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[31] Kitti, M. (2016) Axioms for centrality scoring with principal eigenvectors. Soc. Choice Welf. 46 (3), 639653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[32] Koschützki, D., Lehmann, K. A., Peeters, L., Richter, S., Tenfelde-Podehl, D. & Zlotowski, O. (2005) Centrality indices. In: Brandes, U. & Erlebach, T. (editors), Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3418, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 1661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[33] Koschützki, D., Lehmann, K. A., Tenfelde-Podehl, D. & Zlotowski, O. (2005) Advanced centrality concepts. In: Brandes, U. & Erlebach, T. (editors), Network Analysis: Methodological Foundations, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 3418, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 83111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[34] Landherr, A., Friedl, B. & Heidemann, J. (2010) A critical review of centrality measures in social networks. Bus. Inform. Syst. Eng. 2 (6), 371385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[35] Leavitt, H. J. (1951) Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. J. Abnormal Soc. Psychol. 46 (1), 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[36] Mahadev, N. V. R. & Peled, U. N. (1995) Threshold Graphs and Related Topics, Annals of Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 56, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
[37] Moreno, J. L. (1953) Who Shall Survive? Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy and Sociodrama. Beacon House, New York, NY. First published in 1934.Google Scholar
[38] Neal, Z. (2013) A computationally efficient approximation of beta centrality. Connections 33 (1), 1117.Google Scholar
[39] Nieminen, J. (1973) On the centrality in a directed graph. Soc. Sci. Res. 2 (4), 371378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[40] Nieminen, J. (1974) On the centrality in a graph. Scand. J. Psychol. 15, 332336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[41] Ruhnau, B. (2000) Eigenvector-centrality–a node-centrality? Soc. Netw. 22 (4), 357365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[42] Sabidussi, G. (1966) The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika 31 (4), 581603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[43] Srivastava, H. M. & Manocha, H. L. (1984) A Treatise on Generating Functions. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
[44] Todeschini, R. & Consonni, V. (2009) Molecular Descriptors for Chemoinformatics, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[45] Tutzauer, F. (2007) Entropy as a measure of centrality in networks characterized by path-transfer flow. Soc. Netw. 29 (2), 249265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[46] Valente, T. W. & Foreman, R. K. (1998) Integration and radiality: Measuring the extent of an individual's connectedness and reachability in a network. Soc. Netw. 20 (1), 89105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[47] van den Brink, R. & Gilles, R. P. (2000) Measuring domination in directed networks. Soc. Netw. 22 (2), 141157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[48] Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994) Social Network Aanalysis. Methods and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Re-conceptualizing centrality in social networks
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Re-conceptualizing centrality in social networks
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Re-conceptualizing centrality in social networks
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *