Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    LeFloch, Philippe G. and Mishra, Siddhartha 2014. Numerical methods with controlled dissipation for small-scale dependent shocks. Acta Numerica, Vol. 23, p. 743.

    Li, Yibao Jeong, Darae and Kim, Junseok 2014. Adaptive mesh refinement for simulation of thin film flows. Meccanica, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 239.

    Tiwari, Naveen and Davis, Jeffrey M. 2014. Influence of boundary slip on the dynamics and stability of thermocapillary spreading with a significant gravitational counterflow. Physics of Fluids, Vol. 26, Issue. 10, p. 102103.

    King, John R. and Taranets, Roman M. 2013. Asymmetric travelling waves for the thin film equation. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, Vol. 404, Issue. 2, p. 399.

    LeFloch, Philippe G. and Mishra, Siddhartha 2009. Kinetic functions in magnetohydrodynamics with resistivity and Hall effect. Acta Mathematica Scientia, Vol. 29, Issue. 6, p. 1684.

    LeFloch, Philippe G. and Mohammadian, Majid 2008. Why many theories of shock waves are necessary: Kinetic functions, equivalent equations, and fourth-order models. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 227, Issue. 8, p. 4162.

    Finkel, Daniel E. Kuster, Christopher Lasater, Matthew Levy, Rachel Reese, Jill P. and Ipsen, Ilse C. F. 2006. Communicating Applied Mathematics: Four Examples. SIAM Review, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 359.

    Levy, Rachel and Shearer, Michael 2005. Kinetics and nucleation for driven thin film flow. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, Vol. 209, Issue. 1-4, p. 145.

  • European Journal of Applied Mathematics, Volume 15, Issue 6
  • December 2004, pp. 625-642

Comparison of two dynamic contact line models for driven thin liquid films

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 03 May 2005

The modeling of the motion of a contact line, the triple point at which solid, liquid and air meet, is a major outstanding problem in the fluid mechanics of thin films [2, 9]. In this paper, we compare two well-known models in the specific context of Marangoni driven films. The precursor model replaces the contact line by a sharp transition between the bulk fluid and a thin layer of fluid, effectively pre-wetting the solid; the Navier slip model replaces the usual no-slip boundary condition by a singular slip condition that is effective only very near the contact line. We restrict attention to traveling wave solutions of the thin film PDE for a film driven up an inclined planar solid surface by a thermally induced surface tension gradient. This involves analyzing third order ODE that depend on several parameters. The two models considered here have subtle differences in their description, requiring a careful treatment when comparing traveling waves and effective contact angles. Numerical results exhibit broad agreement between the two models, but the closest comparison can be done only for a rather restricted range of parameters. The driven film context gives contact angle results quite different from the case of a film moving under the action of gravity alone. The numerical technique for exploring phase portraits for the third order ODE is also used to tabulate the kinetic relation and nucleation condition, information that can be used with the underlying hyperbolic conservation law to explain the rich combination of wave structures observed in simulations of the PDE and in experiments [3, 15].

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Applied Mathematics
  • ISSN: 0956-7925
  • EISSN: 1469-4425
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-applied-mathematics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *