Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-pnlb5 Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:51:25.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A distributional approach to 2D Volterra dislocations at the continuum scale

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2012

NICOLAS VAN GOETHEM  and
FRANÇOIS DUPRET
NICOLAS VAN GOETHEM
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Departamento de Matemática, CMAF, Av. Prof. Gama Pinto 2, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal email: vangoeth@ptmat.fc.ul.pt
FRANÇOIS DUPRET
Affiliation:
CESAME, Université catholique de Louvain, Av. G. Lemaître 4, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We develop a theory to represent dislocations and disclinations in single crystals at the continuum (or mesoscopic) scale by directly modelling the defect densities as concentrated effects governed by the distribution theory. The displacement and rotation multi-valuedness is resolved by introducing the intrinsic and single-valued Frank and Burgers tensors from the distributional gradients of the strain field. Our approach provides a new understanding of the theory of line defects as developed by Kröner [10] and other authors [6, 9]. The fundamental identity relating the incompatibility tensor to the Frank and Burgers vectors (and which is a cornerstone of the theory of dislocations in single crystals) is proved in the 2D case under appropriate assumptions on the strain and strain curl growth in the vicinity of the assumed isolated defect lines. In general, our theory provides a rigorous framework for the treatment of crystal line defects at the mesoscopic scale and a basis to strengthen the theory of homogenisation from mesoscopic to macroscopic scale.

Keywords

Dislocationsdisclinationsdistribution theorystrain incompatibilitydefect density tensors

Information

Type
Papers
Information
European Journal of Applied Mathematics , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , June 2012 , pp. 417 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

[1]Almgren, F. J. (1986) Deformations and multiple-valued functions. Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 44, 29–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bui, H. D. (2008) Duality, inverse problems and nonlinear problems in solid mechanics. Comptes Rendus Mécanique. 336 (1–2), 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Burgers, J. M. (1939) Some considerations on the field of stress connected with dislocations in a regular crystal lattice. Proc. K. Ned. Akad. 42, 293–324.Google Scholar
[4]Dascalu, C. & Maugin, G. (1994) The energy of elastic defects: A distributional approach. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 445, 23–37.Google Scholar
[5]Dupret, F. & Van den Bogaert, N. (1994) Modelling Bridgman and Czochralski growth. In: Hurle, D. T. J. (editor), Handbook of Crystal Growth, the Netherlands, Vol. 2B, Ch. 15, The Elsevier, Netherlands, pp. 875–1010.Google Scholar
[6]Eshelby, J. D., Frank, F. C. & Nabarro, F. R. N. (1951) The equilibrium linear arrays of dislocations. Phil. Mag. 42, 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Hirth, J. P. & Lothe, J. (1982) Theory of Dislocations, 2nd ed., Wiley, New-York.Google Scholar
[8]Kleinert, H. (1989) Gauge fields in Condensed Matter, Vol. 1, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Kondo, K. (1952) On the geometrical and physical foundations of the theory of yielding. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Japan Nat. Congr. Applied Mechanics, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 41–47.Google Scholar
[10]Kröner, E. (1981) Continuum theory of defects. In: Balian, R. et al. (editors), Physiques des défauts, North-Holland, Amsterdam, Les Houches, France, Session XXXV, Course 3, pp. 217–315.Google Scholar
[11]Mattila, P. (1995) Geometry of Sets and Measures in Euclidean Spaces-Fractals and Rectifiability. Cambridge studies in advanced mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Maugin, G. (2003) Geometry and thermomechanics of structural rearrangements: Ekkehart Kröner's legacy. ZAMM 83 (2), 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Müller, G. & Friedrich, J. (2004) Challenges in modelling of bulk crystal growth. J. Cryst. Growth 266 (1–3), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Nye, J. F. (1953) Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals. Acta Metall. 1, 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Schwartz, L. (1957) Théorie des distributions, Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
[16]Van Goethem, N. (2007) Mesoscopic Modelling of the Geometry of Dislocations and Point Defect Dynamics, PhD Thesis (135/2007), Université catholique de Louvain, Belgium.Google Scholar
[17]Volterra, V. (1907) Sur l'équilibre des corps élastiques multiplement connexes. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 3 (24), 401–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar