Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Avatars, Monsters, and Machines: A Cyborg Archaeology

  • Colleen Morgan (a1)
Abstract

As digital practice in archaeology becomes pervasive and increasingly invisible, I argue that there is a deep creative potential in practising a cyborg archaeology. A cyborg archaeology draws from feminist posthumanism to transgress bounded constructions of past people as well as our current selves. By using embodied technologies to disturb archaeological interpretations, we can push the use of digital media in archaeology beyond traditional, skeuomorphic reproductions of previous methods to highlight ruptures in thought and practice. I develop this argument through investigating the avatars, machines, and monsters in current digital archaeological research. These concepts are productively liminal: avatars, machines, and monsters blur boundaries between humans and non-humans, the past and the present, and suggest productive approaches to future research.

Avec la généralisation des pratiques numériques en archéologie, qui deviennent cependant de plus en plus imperceptibles, l'auteur soutient qu'il existe un vaste potentiel de créativité dans la pratique de l'archéologie cybernétique. Cette discipline s'inspire du posthumanisme féministe pour briser les limitations de nos préconceptions sur les gens du passé mais aussi sur nous-mêmes. L'emploi de technologies incorporées et de médias numériques en archéologie nous permet de dépasser les limites des reconstitutions traditionnelles et skeuomorphiques produites par des méthodes plus anciennes, de bouleverser nos interprétations et de mettre l'accent sur certains points de rupture dans la pensée et en pratique. L'auteur traite ce sujet à travers l'examen d'avatars, de machines et de monstres tels qu'on les représente de nos jours en archéologie numérique. Ces concepts, liminaires mais productifs car les avatars, les montres et les machines brouillent les frontières entre ce qui est humain et non-humain et entre le passé et le présent, nous permettent d'entrevoir des approches fructueuses en recherche. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Als sich die Digitalisierung in der archäologischen Praxis durchsetzt und zunehmend unsichtbar wird, wird hier der Standpunkt vertreten, dass die Ausübung der Cyborg-Archäologie potenziell sehr kreativ sein könnte. Die Cyborg-Archäologie ist vom feministischen Posthumanismus beeinflusst und bietet die Möglichkeit, unsere beschränkten Vorstellungen der Menschen in der Vergangenheit aber auch von uns selbst zu überwinden. Mithilfe der verkörperten Technologien und Digitalmedien in der Archäologie können wir die Grenzen der traditionellen, skeuomorphischen Rekonstruktionen der älteren Methoden überschreiten, archäologische Deutungen stören und gewisse intellektuelle und praktische Bruchstellen aufzeigen. Dies wird hier anhand von Untersuchungen von Avataren, Maschinen und Monstern in der gegenwärtigen digital-archäologischen Forschung herausgearbeitet. Solche liminale aber produktive Auffassungen, weil die Avatare, Maschinen und Monster die Grenzen zwischen dem Menschlichen und Nicht-Menschlichen und zwischen der Gegenwart und der Vergangenheit verwischen, stellen vielversprechende Ansätze für weitere Forschungen dar. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Copyright
References
Hide All
Barceló, J.A. 2007. Automatic Archaeology. In: Cameron, S. & Kenderdine, F., eds. Theorizing Digital Cultural Heritage. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press, pp. 437–56.
Beale, G. & Reilly, P. 2017. Digital Practice as Meaning Making in Archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44: 62.
Bender, B. 2007. Stone Worlds: Narrative and Reflexivity in Landscape Archaeology. Walnut Creek (CA): Left Coast Press.
Bevan, A. 2015. The Data Deluge. Antiquity, 89: 1473–84.
Borges, J.L. 1998. Collected Fictions (trans. by Hurley, A.). London: Penguin.
Braidotti, R. 1997. Mothers, Monsters, and Machines. In: Medina, K.C.N., Medina, N. & Stanbury, S., eds. Writing on the Body: Female Embodiment and Feminist Theory. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 5979.
Braidotti, R. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity.
Braidotti, R. 2016. Posthuman Critical Theory. In: Banerji, D. & Paranjape, M.R., eds. Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures. New Delhi: Springer India, pp. 1332.
Champion, E.M. 2008. Explorative Shadow Realms of Uncertain Histories. In: Kalay, Y., Kvan, T. & Afflect, J., eds. New Heritage: New Media AND Cultural Heritage. London: Routledge, pp. 185206.
Chrysanthi, A., Berggren, Å., Davies, R., Earl, G.P. & Knibbe, J. 2016. The Camera ‘at the Trowel's Edge’: Personal Video Recording in Archaeological Research. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23: 238–70.
Crema, E.R., Bevan, A. & Shennan, S. 2017. Spatio-temporal Approaches to Archaeological Radiocarbon Dates. Journal of Archaeological Science, 87: 19.
Denard, H. 2012. A New Introduction to the London Charter. In: Bentkowska-Kafel, A., Denard, H. & Baker, D., eds. Paradata and Transparency in Virtual Heritage. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 5771.
Edgeworth, M. 2014. From Spade-work to Screen-work: New Forms of Archaeological Discovery in Digital Space. In: Carusi, A., Sissel Hoel, A., Webmoor, T. & Woolgar, S., eds. Visualization in the Age of Computerization. London: Routledge, pp. 4058.
Edgeworth, M. 2018. More Than Just a Record: Active Ecological Effects of Archaeological Strata. In: Torres de Souza, M.A. & Menezes Costa, D., eds. Historical Archaeology and Environment. Cham: Springer, pp. 1940.
Eve, S. 2014. Dead Men's Eyes: Embodied GIS, Mixed Reality and Landscape Archaeology (BAR British Series 600). Oxford: Archaeopress.
Eve, S. 2018. Losing our Senses, an Exploration of 3D Object Scanning. Open Archaeology, 4: 114–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2018-0007
Finn, C. 2002. Artifacts: An Archaeologist's Year in Silicon Valley. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
Finn, C. 2003. Bits and Pieces: A Mini Survey of Computer Collecting. Industrial Archaeology Review, 25: 119–28.
Frankland, T. 2012. A CG Artist's Impression: Depicting Virtual Reconstructions Using Non-photorealistic Rendering Techniques. In: Chrysanthi, A., Murrieta Flores, P. & Papadopoulos, C., eds. Thinking Beyond the Tool: Archaeological Computing and the Interpretive Process (BAR International Series 2344). Oxford: Archaeopress, pp. 2439.
Fredengren, C. 2013. Posthumanism, the Transcorporeal and Biomolecular Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 21: 5371.
Fredengren, C. 2015. Nature–Cultures: Heritage, Sustainability and Feminist Posthumanism. Current Swedish Archaeology, 23: 109–30.
Gifford-Gonzalez, D. 1993. You Can Hide, But You Can't Run: Representations of Women's Work in Illustrations of Palaeolithic Life. Visual Anthropology Review: Journal of the Society for Visual Anthropology, 9: 2241.
Graham, S., Eve, S., Morgan, C. & Pantos, A. 2019a. Hearing the Past. In: Kee, K. & Compeau, T.J., eds. Seeing the Past with Computers: Experiments with Augmented Reality and Computer Vision for History. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Michigan Press, pp. 224–36.
Graham, S., Gupta, N., Smith, J., Angourakis, A., Reinhard, A., Ellenberger, K., et al. 2019b. The Open Digital Archaeology Textbook [online] [accessed 7 March 2019]. Available at: <https://o-date.github.io/draft/book/index.html>
Haraway, D. 1985. A Manifesto for Cyborgs: Science, Technology, and Socialist Feminism in the 1980s. Socialist Review, 80: 65108.
Haraway, D. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York & London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. New York & London: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 1992. The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others. In: Grossberg, L., Nelson, C. & Treichler, P.A., eds. Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, pp. 295336.
Haraway, D. 1995. Cyborgs and Symbionts: Living Together in the New World Order. In: Hables-Gray, C., ed. The Cyborg Handbook. New York: Routledge, pp. xi-xx.
Haraway, D. 1997. Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.
Hasler, B.S., Spanlang, B. & Slater, M. 2017. Virtual Race Transformation Reverses Racial In-group Bias. PloS One, 12: e0174965. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174965
Hayles, N.K. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N.K. 2003. Afterword: The Human in the Posthuman. Cultural Critique, 53: 134–37.
Hayward, E. 2010. Fingeryeyes: Impressions of Cup Corals. Cultural Anthropology: Journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology, 25: 577–99.
Heidegger, M. 2010. Being and Time (ed. by Schmidt, D.J., trans. by Stambaugh, J.). Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.
Howes, D. 2005. Introduction. In: Howes, D., ed. Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. London: Berg, pp. 117.
Huggett, J. 2017. The Apparatus of Digital Archaeology. Internet Archaeology, 44. https://doi.org/10.11141/ia.44.7
Huvila, I., ed. 2018. Archaeology and Archaeological Information in the Digital Society. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
Jeffrey, S. 2015. Challenging Heritage Visualisation: Beauty, Aura and Democratisation. Open Archaeology, 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2015-0008
Jones, A.M. & Diaz-Guardamino, M. 2019. Digital Collaborations. In: Jones, A.M. & Diaz-Guardamino, M.. Making a Mark: Image and Process in Neolithic Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Oxbow, pp. 211–15.
Jones, S.H. & Harris, A. 2016. Monsters, Desire and the Creative Queer Body. Continuum, 30(5): 518–30.
Joyce, R.A. & Tringham, R.E. 2007. Feminist Adventures in Hypertext. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14: 328–58.
Kintigh, K.W., Altschul, J.H., Beaudry, M.C., Drennan, R.D., Kinzig, A.P., Kohler, T.A., et al. 2014. Grand Challenges for Archaeology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111: 879–80.
Květina, P. & Končelová, M. 2013. From Punch Cards to Virtual Space: Changing the Concept of Archaeological Heritage Management in the Digital Age. In: Biehl, P.F. & Prescott, C., eds. Heritage in the Context of Globalization: Europe and the Americas. New York: Springer, pp. 95101.
Law, M. & Morgan, C. 2014. The Archaeology of Digital Abandonment: Online Sustainability and Archaeological Sites. Present Pasts, 6: 19.
Lucas, G. 2012. Understanding the Archaeological Record. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, C. 2009. (Re)Building Çatalhöyük: Changing Virtual Reality in Archaeology. Archaeologies, 5: 468–87.
Morgan, C. 2015. Punk, DIY, and Anarchy in Archaeological Thought and Practice. AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology, 5: 123–46. https://doi.org/10.23914/ap.v5i0.67
Morgan, C. forthcoming. The Queer and the Digital: The Politics of Archaeological Representation. In: Blackmore, C. & Springate, M., eds. Queering the Past. London: Routledge.
Morgan, C. & Eve, S. 2012. DIY and Digital Archaeology: What Are You Doing to Participate? World Archaeology, 44: 521–37.
Morgan, C. & Wright, H. 2018. Pencils and Pixels: Drawing and Digital Media in Archaeological Field Recording. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43: 136–51.
Moshenska, G. 2014. The Archaeology of (Flash) Memory. Post-Medieval Archaeology, 48: 255–59.
Opitz, R. 2018. Publishing Archaeological Excavations at the Digital Turn. Journal of Field Archaeology, 43(supplement): S68S82.
Perry, S. 2014. Crafting Knowledge with (Digital) Visual Media in Archaeology. In: Chapman, R. & Wylie, A., eds. Material Evidence: Learning from Archaeological Practice. London: Routledge, pp. 189210.
Perry, S. & Morgan, C. 2015. Materializing Media Archaeologies: The MAD-P Hard Drive Excavation. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology, 2: 94104.
Piccini, A. 2015. ‘To See What's Down There’: Embodiment, Gestural Archaeologies, and Materializing Futures. Paragraph, 38: 5568.
Prasad, A. 2017. Introduction: Global Assemblages of Technoscience. Science, Technology and Society, 22: 15.
Prophet, J. 1996. Sublime Ecologies and Artistic Endeavors: Artificial Life and Interactivity in the Online Project ‘TechnoSphere’. Leonardo, 29: 339–44.
Prophet, J. 2001. TechnoSphere: ‘Real’ Time, ‘Artificial’ Life. Leonardo, 34: 309–12.
Pujol-Tost, L. 2017. ‘3D·CoD’: A New Methodology for the Design of Virtual Reality-mediated Experiences in Digital Archeology. Frontiers in Digital Humanities, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdigh.2017.00016
Reinhard, A. 2017. Video Games as Archaeological Sites: Treating Digital Entertainment as Built Environments. In: Mol, A.A.A., Ariese-Vandemeulebroucke, C.E., Boom, K.H.J. & Politopoulos, A., eds. The Interactive Past: Archaeology, Heritage & Video Games. Leiden: Sidestone Press, pp. 99106.
Reinhard, A. 2018. Archaeogaming: An Introduction to Archaeology in and of Video Games. New York: Berghahn Books.
Rucker, R.v.B., Sirius, R.U. and Queen Mu, 1992. Mondo 2000: A User's Guide to the New Edge. New York: Harper Perennial.
Sirius, R.U. & Cornell, J. 2015. Transcendence: The Disinformation Encyclopedia of Transhumanism and the Singularity. San Francisco (CA): Red Wheel Weiser.
Strathern, M. 1988. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press.
Taylor, T.L. 2002. Living Digitally: Embodiment in Virtual Worlds. In: Schroeder, R., ed. The Social Life of Avatars: Presence and Interaction in Shared Virtual Environments. London: Springer, pp. 4062.
Tringham, R. 1991a. Men and Women in Prehistoric Architecture. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review, 111: 927.
Tringham, R. 1991b. Households with Faces: The Challenge of Gender in Prehistoric Architectural Remains. In: Gero, J. & Conkey, M., eds. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 93131.
Tringham, R. 2010. Forgetting and Remembering the Digital Experience and Digital Data. In: Boric, D., ed. Archaeology and Memory. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 68105.
Tringham, R. 2012. The Public Face of Archaeology at Çatalhöyük. In: Tringham, R. & Stevanovic, M.. Last House on the Hill: BACH Area Reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Los Angeles (CA): Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, pp. 503–35.
Tringham, R. 2013. A Sense of Touch: The Full-Body Experience in the Past and Present of Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In: Day, J., ed. Making Senses of the Past: Toward a Sensory Archaeology. Carbondale (IL): Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 177–95.
Turkle, S. 1997. Multiple Subjectivity and Virtual Community at the End of the Freudian Century. Sociological Inquiry, 67: 7284.
Tzouganatou, A. 2018. Can Heritage Bots Thrive? Toward Future Engagement in Cultural Heritage. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 6: 377–83.
Witmore, C.L. 2004. Four Archaeological Engagements with Place Mediating Bodily Experience Through Peripatetic Video. Visual Anthropology Review: Journal of the Society for Visual Anthropology, 20: 5772.
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Waters, C.N., Barnosky, A.D., Palmesino, J., Rönnskog, A.S, et al. 2017. Scale and Diversity of the Physical Technosphere: A Geological Perspective. Anthropocene Review, 4: 922. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616677743
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Archaeology
  • ISSN: 1461-9571
  • EISSN: 1741-2722
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-archaeology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed