Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:25:42.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Romancing the Stones: Archaeology in Popular Cinema

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

Mark A. Hall
Mark A. Hall*
Affiliation:
Perth Museum and Art Gallery, Scotland, UK
*
[email: mahall@pkc.gov.uk]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article looks at the depiction of archaeology and archaeologists in popular cinema. A number of key films are discussed to address the article's main themes of cultural appropriation and contested ground (encompassing treasure, the public, politics and gender). Archaeology in film cannot be divorced from the wider cultural contexts in which it operates and, though portrayals of archaeology and archaeologists are frequently unsatisfactory, a positive conclusion is attempted which seeks to understand the narrative drive of popular fiction and a long history of public exclusion from archaeology. Most of the films considered do not warrant labelling as great works of art, but they are part of a cultural form with perceptions to offer, able to stimulate debate within a vital framework of cultural practices by which identity – individual and social – is constructed and evolved.

Cet article traite de la représentation de l'archéologie et des archéologues dans le cinéma populaire. De nombreux films clés sont analysés afin d'aborder les sujets principaux de l'article : l'appropriation culturelle et des éléments contestés comme les trésors, le public, la politique et le sexe. La représentation de l'archéologie dans un film ne peut être séparée des contextes culturels généraux dans lesquels elle évolue et, bien que les évocations de l'archéologie et des archéologues ne soient souvent pas satisfaisantes, l'auteur cherche à arriver à une conclusion favorable en essayant de comprendre le dynamisme narratif de la fiction populaire et la longue histoire d'exclusion du public des domaines de l'archéologie. La plupart des films considérés n'aspirent pas à être classés comme chefs d'œuvres, mais font part d'une forme culturelle parfois perspicace et capable d'inciter le débat dans le cadre essentiel de pratiques culturelles qui construisent et développent l'identité individuelle et sociale.

Zusammenfassung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit der Darstellung von Archäologie und Archäologen im Kinofilm. Eine Reihe von Schlüsselfilmen werden diskutiert, die die Hauptthemen des Artikels, nämlich kulturelle Aneignung und umstrittenen Bereiche (einschließlich Schatz, der Öffentlichkeit, Politik und Geschlechterfragen), ansprechen. Die Darstellung der Archäologie im Film lässt sich nicht von den weiteren kulturellen Kontexten trennen, in denen sie wirken, und es kann – wenngleich auch die Abbildung von Archäologie und Archäologen häufig unbefriedigend ist – ein positiver Schluss gezogen werden, anhand dessen versucht wird, den erzählerischen Antrieb der öffentlichen Fiktion und die lange Geschichte des Ausschlusses der Öffentlichkeit von der Archäologie zu verstehen. Die meisten der einbezogenen Filme können zwar nicht als große Kunstwerke gelten, aber sie sind Teil einer Kulturform, die Ansichten anbietet, die eine Debatte innerhalb eines vitalen Kontextes kultureller Praktiken ermöglichen, durch die Identität – sei es die des Individuums oder der Gruppe – geschaffen wird und sich entwickelt.

Keywords

cinemaEurocentrismfilm studiespopular culturetreasurecinémaeurocentrismeétude de filmsculture populairetrésorKinoEurozentrismusFilmstudienPopulärkulturSchatz
Type
Articles
Information
European Journal of Archaeology , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , 2004 , pp. 159 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 Sage Publications 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, B., 1991. Imagined Communities (revised edn). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bahrani, Zainab, 1998. Conjuring Mesopotamia: imaginative geography and a world past. In Lynn, Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire, Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: 159–74. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, 1984. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Buscombe, Edward, ed., 1988. The BFI Companion to the Western. London: BFI.Google Scholar
Cadigan, Pat, 1999. Resurrecting The Mummy - The Making of the Movie. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
Chaldis, Nadia, 2001. ‘The glamour of the East’: some reflections on Agatha Christie's Murder in Mesopotamia. In Charlotte, Triimpler (ed.), Agatha Christie and Archaeology: 335–350. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Curl, James Stevens, 1994. Egyptomania - The Egyptian Ideal: a Recurring theme in the History of Taste. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Daly, N., 1994. That obscure object of desire: Victorian commodity culture and fictions of the Mummy. Novel 28(1):24–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvill, Timothy, Katherine, Barker, Barbara, Bender and Ronald, Hutton, 1999. The Cerne Giant: an Antiquity on Trial. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Day, David, 1997. A Treasure Hard to Attain: Images of Archaeology in Popular Film, with a Filmography. Langham, MD and London: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
Frayling, Christopher 1992. The Face of Tutankhamun. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Gramsci, Antonio, 1998 [1971] Hegemony, intellectuals and the state. In John, Storey (ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader: 210–216. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall (2nd edn).Google Scholar
Gray, John, 2002. Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
Guglielmi, Waltraud, 2001. Agatha Christie and her use of Ancient Egyptian sources. In Charlotte, Triimpler (ed.), Agatha Christie and Archaeology: 351–390. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark, 2000. In the popular gaze: museums in the movies. In Susan, Pearce (ed.), Researching Material Culture: 87–116. Leicester: Leicester Archaeology Monograph 8/Material Culture Study Group Occasional Paper No. 1.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark, 2002. Archaeology in fiction: the past as popcorn? In Philip, Wise (ed.) Public Archaeology: Remains to be Seen. The Museum Archaeologist 27:29–34. Colchester: Society of Museum Archaeologists.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart, 1998 [1981]. Notes on deconstructing the popular. In John, Storey (ed.), Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: A Reader: 42–53. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall (2nd edn).Google Scholar
Hamer, Mary, 1993. Signs of Cleopatra: History, Politics, Representation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haslam, Rob, 2002. Past futures or present pasts. In Miles, Russell (ed.) Digging Holes in Popular Culture: Archaeology and Science Fiction: 104–111. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Hassan, Fakim, 1998. Memorabilia, archaeological materiality and national identity in Egypt. In Lynn, Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire, Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: 200–216. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haβmann, Henning, 2000. Archaeology in the ‘Third Reich’. In Heinrich, Härke (ed.), Archaeology, Ideology and Society, the German Experience: 65–139. Frankfurt am Main and New York: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Jones, Stephen, 1987. The British Labour Movement and Film 1918–1939. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul.Google Scholar
Koerner, Joseph, 2002. Albrecht Dürer: A sixteenth century Influenza. In Giulia, Bartrum (ed.) Albrecht Dürer and his Legacy: 18–38. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Landau, Diana, ed., 2000. Gladiator - The Making of the Ridley Scott Epic. London: Boxtree.Google Scholar
Lant, A., 1992. The curse of the Pharaoh or how cinema contracted Egyptomania. October 59:87–112.Google Scholar
Mathews, Keith J., 2002. Archaeology and the extraterrestrial: Blair Cuspids, Martian monuments and beyond the infinite. In Miles, Russell (ed.), Digging Holes in Popular Culture: Archaeology and Science Fiction: 129–160. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Membury, Steven, 2002. The celluloid archaeologist – an X-rated exposé. In Miles, Russell (ed.), Digging Holes in Popular Culture: Archaeology and Science Fiction: 8–18. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Meskell, Lynn, 1998a. Consuming bodies: cultural fantasies of Ancient Egypt. Body and Society 4(1):63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meskell, Lynn, 1998b. Introduction: archaeology matters. In Lynn, Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire, Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East: 1–12. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulvey, Lara, 2000. Satellite of love. Sight and Sound 10(12): 20–5.Google Scholar
Nicholas, Lynn, 1994. The Rape of Europa: the Fate of Europe's Art Treasures in the Third Reich and the Second World War. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pearce, Susan and Alexandra, Bounia (eds), 2000. The Collector's Voice Volume 1: Ancient Voices. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Petrie, Duncan, 1993. But what if Beauty is a Beast? Doubles, transformations and fairy tale motifs in Batman Returns. In Duncan, Petrie (ed.), Cinema and the Realms of Enchantment: 98–110. London: BFI.Google Scholar
Russell, Miles, ed. 2002a. Digging Holes in Popular Culture: Archaeology and Science Fiction. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Russell, Miles, 2002b. ‘No more heroes any more’: the dangerous world of the pop culture archaeologist. In Miles, Russell (ed.) Digging Holes in Popular Culture: Archaeology and Science Fiction: 38–56. Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
Schiffer, Reinhold, 2001. Agatha's Arabs: Agatha Christie in the tradition of British Oriental travellers. In Charlotte, Triimpler (ed.) Agatha Christie and Archaeology: 303–333. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Schnapp, Alain, 1996. The Discovery of the Past - the Origins of Archaeology. London: British Museum Press.Google Scholar
Shohat, Elia, and Robert, Stam, 1994. Unthinking Eurocentrism, Multiculturalism and the Media. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Singer, Michael, 1997. Batman and Robin - The Making of the Movie. London: Titan Books.Google Scholar
Tatum, Stephen, 1988. Dime Novels. In Edward, Buscombe (ed.), The BFI Companion to the Western: 109–111. London: BFI.Google Scholar
Thomas, Charles, 1976. The archaeology of fiction. In Megaw, J.V.S. (ed.), To Illustrate the Monuments, Essays on Archaeology presented to Stuart Piggott: 310–319. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Trigger, Bruce, 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willis, Andy, 1995. Cultural studies and popular film. In Joanne, Hollows and Mark, Jancovich (eds), Approaches to Popular Film: 173–191. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Christopher 2001. In Ruins. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Wyke, Maria, 1997. Projecting the Past, Ancient Rome, Cinema and History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar