Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T05:03:39.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Wreckage Installation: Towards an Archaeology of Southern Sweden's Heterotopias

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2022

Leila Papoli-Yazdi
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Communication, Malmö University, Sweden
William Hogland
Affiliation:
Department of Biology and Environmental Science, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden

Abstract

During a survey on the island of Öland in south-eastern Sweden, whose aim was to study the local waste-disposal practices, the authors recorded abandoned machinery and cars dating from the 1940s to today in locations close to residential areas and farms, and complemented the investigation by interviewing informants. This led them to conclude that dumping redundant objects in the surroundings of villages forms an entangled network with other behaviour, i.e. collecting things which had outlived their usefulness and embedding them in the landscape. The behaviour observed in Öland is compared with two other cases of collecting abandoned objects in Öland and southern Sweden. Using the location and chronology of the finds, the authors interpret the behaviour by borrowing the concept of heterotopia, as defined by Foucault.

Au cours de recherches dans l’île d’Öland dans le sud-est de la Suède destinées à étudier les pratiques d’élimination des déchets, les auteurs ont documenté des vestiges de voitures et autres engins des années 1940 à nos jours abandonnés dans des lieux proches de fermes et de zones résidentielles. Cette étude, complémentée par des entrevues avec les habitants de l’île, leur permet de conclure que les décharges d'objets devenus inutiles aux alentours des villages faisaient partie des habitudes locales de recueillir des objets usagés et de les insérer dans le paysage. Les auteurs comparent deux autres cas de collecte d'objets dans le sud de la suède et Öland au comportement observé sur l’île d’Öland. L'emplacement et la chronologie des objets leur permet de proposer que ce comportement représente un type d'hétérotopie telle que la définit Foucault. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Während einer Studie der lokalen Abfallentsorgungsgewohnheiten auf der Insel Öland im schwedischen Südosten haben die Verfasser verlassene Fahrzeuge und Maschinen von den 1940er-Jahren bis heute in der Nähe von Siedlungen und Bauernhöfen dokumentiert. Die einheimische Bevölkerung wurde auch befragt. Damit gelangten die Verfasser zur Auffassung, dass die Entsorgung von nicht mehr brauchbaren Gegenständen in der Nähe von Dörfern ein Verhaltensmuster zum Vorschein bringt, welches das Sammeln von unbenutzbaren Sachen und ihre Einfügung in die Landschaft einschließt. Die Verhaltungsweise der Einwohner Ölands wird mit zwei anderen Sammlungen von verlassenen Gegenständen in Südschweden verglichen. Angesichts der Lage und Chronologie der Funde weist das Verhaltensmuster auf eine Heterotopie, wie sie Foucault definiert. Translation by Madeleine Hummler

Under en undersökning på Öland i sydöstra Sverige, vars syfte var att studera de lokala avfallshanteringsmetoderna, registrerade författarna övergivna maskiner och bilar från 1940-talet till idag på platser nära bostadsområden och gårdar. Undersökningen stärktes av intervjuer som hölls med informanter. Detta fick författarnaatt dra slutsatsen att dumpning av överflödiga föremål i byarnas omgivningar bildar ett intrasslat nätverk med andra beteenden. Det vill säga att samla in saker som överlevt sin användbarhet och bädda in dem i landskapet. Det beteende som observerats på Öland jämförs med två andra fall av insamling av övergivna föremål på Öland och i södra Sverige. Med hjälp av fyndens plats och kronologi tolkar författarna beteendet genom att låna begreppet heterotopia, enligt definitionen av Foucault. Translation by the authors

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Association of Archaeologists

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, G. 2009. The Signature of All Things: On Method. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
Andriotis, K. 2010. Heterotopic Erotic Oases: The Public Nude Beach Experience. Annals of Tourism Research, 37: 1076–96.Google Scholar
Birringer, J. 1998. Makrolab: A Heterotopia. Journal of Performance and Art, 20: 6675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgholms kommun 2012. Kulturmiljöutredning av området Byxelkrok Landskapslaget AB & Wenanders, September 2012 [online] [accessed on 1 July 2022]. Available at: <https://www.borgholm.se/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/kulturmiljobeskrivning.pdf>>Google Scholar
Brunclíková, L. 2017. Waste and Value in the Post-Socialist Space. Anthropologie, 55: 385–98.Google Scholar
Buchli, V. & Lucas, G. 2001. Between Remembering and Forgetting. In: Buchli, V. & Lucas, G., eds. Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past. New York & London: Routledge, pp. 7984.Google Scholar
Burström, M. 2011. Garbage or Heritage: The Existential Dimension of a Car Cemetery. In: Holtorf, C. & Piccini, A., eds. Contemporary Archaeologies: Excavating Now. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, pp. 131–43.Google Scholar
Carhenge n.d. Carhenge: The Nebraska Answer to Stonehenge [online] [accessed 1 July 2022]. Available at: <https://carhenge.com>>Google Scholar
Dehaene, M. & De Cauter, L. 2008. Heterotopia in a Post-Civil Society. In: Dehaene, M. & De Cauter, L., eds. Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Post-Civil Society. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, M. 1966. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Einla, L. 2009. The Notion of Heterotopia in the Practice of Landscape Architecture. The Garden of Education Einla, L. Alnarp (MA dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Science Faculty of Landscape Planning, Horticulture and Agricultural Science).Google Scholar
Ekströmer, L. 1976. Silver och ostindiskt till museet och Krusenstjerna gården. In: Petersson, K.G. & Pettersson, K., eds. Kalmar Län, Årsbok för kulturhistoria och hembygdsvård. Kalmar: Barometern, pp. 7988.Google Scholar
Elden, S. & Crampton, J.W. 2007. Space, Knowledge and Power: Foucault and Geography. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Fahlbeck, A. with Jonas, C. & Almqvist, L. 1983. På Öland och i Kalmartrakten. In: Lundberg, M.-B., Svanström, I., Petersson, K.G. & Warringer, F., eds. Kalmar Län, Årsbok för kulturhistoria och hembygdsvård. Kalmar: Barometern, pp. 5865.Google Scholar
Flyn, C. 2021. Islands of Abandonment: Life in the Post-Human Landscape. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1971. The Order of Things. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1984. Of Other Spaces: Utopias and Heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, 5: 4649. https://web.mit.edu/allanmc/www/foucault1.pdfGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. 1990. Maurice Blanchot: The Thought from Outside. In: Foucault, M. & Blanchot, M., eds. Foucault/Blanchot: Maurice Blanchot: The Thought from Outside and Michel Foucault as I Imagine Him. New York: Zone Books, pp. 758.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 2008. Of Other Spaces [1967]. In: Dehaene, M. & De Cauter, L., eds. Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Post-Civil Society. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 1329.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. & Miskowiec, J. 1986. Of Other Spaces. Diacritics 16(1): 22-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. 2014. Contemporary Past: Archaeology of the. In: Smith, C., ed. Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 1683–94.Google Scholar
González-Ruibal, A. 2018. Beyond the Anthropocene: Defining the Age of Destruction. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 51: 1021.Google Scholar
Harrison, R. & Schofield, J. 2010. After Modernity: Archaeological Approaches to the Contemporary Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. ed. 1991. The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Symbolic Expression. New York: Harper Collins Academic.Google Scholar
Hodder, I. 2012. Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships between Humans and Things. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hook, D. 2007. Space, Discourse, Power: Heterotopia as Analytics. In: Hook, D., ed. Foucault, Psychology, and the Analytics of Power. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp 178214.Google Scholar
Johnson, P. 2006. Unravelling Foucault's Different Spaces. History of the Human Sciences, 19: 7590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalmar Lån 1957a. Marknad och torgdag i Östsmåland och på Öland. In: Hofren, M., ed. Kalmar Län, Årsbok för kulturhistoria och hembygdsvård. Kalmar: Barometern, pp. 530.Google Scholar
Kalmar Lån 1957b. Virserums hembygdspark, vägledning och beskrivning. In: Hofren, M., ed. Kalmar Län, Årsbok för kulturhistoria och hembygdsvård. Kalmar: Barometern, pp. 7387.Google Scholar
Kalmon, S., O'Neill-Jones, P., Stout, C. & Sargent Wood, L. 2012. From Corn Chips to Garbology: The Dynamics of Historical Inquiry. Organization of American Historians Magazine of History, 26 : 1318.Google Scholar
Kyrkö Car Cemetery n.d. Kyrkö car cemetery, Tingsryd SV, Sweden [online] [accessed 8 November 2021]. Available at: <https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/kyrko-car-cemetery>>Google Scholar
Kyrkö Car Cemetery 2015. Photographs [online] [accessed 8 November 2021]. Available at: <http://www.rendahl.se/bil-kyrkogard.htm>>Google Scholar
Lekesizalin, F. 2009. Art, Desire, and Death in Orhan Pamuk's My Name Is Red. English Studies in Africa, 52: 90103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindkvist, J. n.d. Tillbaka till bilkyrkogården [online] [accessed 8 November 2021]. Available at: <https://www.transportarbetaren.se/tillbaka-till-bilkyrkogarden/>>Google Scholar
Ljungberg, E. 2020. Media Practices in the Making of an ‘Other Space’: Communicating Inclusion, Exclusion, and Belonging in a Controversial Heterotopia. New Media & Society, 22: 2166–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lussier, M. 2011. Review of The Signature of All Things by Giorgio Agamben. Theory, Culture & Society, 28: 165–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales, A. 1995. Dynamic Identities in Heterotopia. Bilingual Review/La Revista Bilingüe, 20: 1427.Google Scholar
Moshenska, G. 2016. Reverse Engineering and the Archaeology of the Modern World. Forum Kritische Archäologie, 5: 1628.Google Scholar
Niklasson, E. & Hølleland, H. 2018. The Scandinavian Far-Right and the New Politicisation of Heritage. Journal of Social Archaeology 18(2): 121–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nostalgigaraget Öland n.d. Nostalgigaraget [online] [accessed 21 August 2022]. Available at: <https://www.alltpaoland.se/platser/nostalgigaraget/>>Google Scholar
Papoli-Yazdi, L. 2021. Garbage Hunting-Gathering: The Ignored Face of Future Cities. Forum Kritische Archäologie, 10: 89101.Google Scholar
Parker Pearson, M. 2003. The Archaeology of Death and Burial. Stroud: Sutton.Google Scholar
Prütz, C. & Warhus, N. n.d. I & I Christina Prütz [online] [accessed 8 November 2021]. Available at: <https://www.xn--i-o-ichristinaprtz-16b.se/>>Google Scholar
Rathje, W. & Murphy, C. 2001. Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage. Tucson (AZ): University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Rodwell, W. 2012. The Archaeology of Churches. Stroud: Amberley.Google Scholar
Sajjad, N.A. & Perveen, A. 2019. Private Heterotopia and the Public Space: An Incongruity Explored through Orhan Pamuk's My Name Is Red. SAGE Open, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824490Google Scholar
Sohn, H. 2008. Heterotopia: Anamnesis of a Medical Term. In: Dehaene, M. & De Cauter, L., eds. Heterotopia and the City: Public Space in a Post-Civil Society. London & New York: Routledge, pp. 4150.Google Scholar
Spanu, S. 2019. Heterotopia and Heritage Preservation: The Heterotopic Tool as a Means of Heritage Assessment. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. 2000. Archaeology and Modernity. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Törmä, M. 2021. Nordic Private Collections of Chinese Objects. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Torps gårdsmuseum n.d. Fotoalbum [online] [accessed 8 November 2021]. Available at: <http://www.torpsgardsmuseum.se/26050104>>Google Scholar
Turner, V. 1969. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vidler, A., Foucault, M. & Johnston, P. 2014. Heterotopias. Architectural Association Files, 69: 1822.Google Scholar
Williams, T. 2022. Adrift: The Curious Tale of the Lego Lost at Sea. Lewes: Unicorn.Google Scholar