Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ramanath, Ramya 2016. Defying NGO-ization?: Lessons in Livelihood Resilience Observed Among Involuntarily Displaced Women in Mumbai, India. World Development, Vol. 84, p. 1.


    Khoo, Su-ming 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Peschard, Karine 2014. Farmers' rights and food sovereignty: critical insights from India. The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 41, Issue. 6, p. 1085.


    Mosse, David 2013. The Anthropology of International Development. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 42, Issue. 1, p. 227.


    Pelican, Michaela 2013. Insights from Cameroon: Five years after the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (Respond to this article at http://www.therai.org.uk/at/debate). Anthropology Today, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 13.


    Nguyen, V K 2009. Government-by-exception: Enrolment and experimentality in mass HIV treatment programmes in Africa. Social Theory & Health, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 196.


    Randeria, Shalini 2007. GLOBAL DESIGNS AND LOCAL LIFEWORLDS. Interventions, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 12.


    ×

Cunning States and Unaccountable International Institutions: Legal Plurality, Social Movements and Rights of Local Communities to Common Property Resources

  • SHALINI RANDERIA (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003975603001188
  • Published online: 01 April 2003
Abstract

The paper analyses the new architecture of global governance which is characterised by unaccountable international institutions and scattered sovereignties. It examines the dilemmas of civil society actors (social movements and NGOs) involved in protecting the rights of local communities through strategic issue-based alliances with the state or the World Bank, whose legitimacy they question in other contexts. The cunning state remains a central actor in selectively transposing neoliberal policies to the national terrain and capitalises on its perceived weakness in order to render itself unaccountable to its citizens. The argument draws on empirical material from India around conflicts over the patenting of genetic resources, biodiversity conservation, forced displacement and privatisation of common property resources.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×