Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

God’s Technicians: Religious Jurists and the Usury Ban in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam

  • Ryan Calder (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

At the heart of the $2 trillion Islamic-finance industry is a ban on interest. But why is there only an Islamic ban on interest today? After all, for over a millennium, interest was also gravely sinful in Judaism and Christianity. While scholars have addressed the evolution of Jewish, Christian, and Islamic economic morality in isolation, very few since Weber have tackled the interest question directly and comparatively.

I argue that the fate of the religious interest ban has always depended on the fate of religious jurists. When religious jurists are absent, no systematic interest ban emerges. When religious jurists emerge as technical experts, the interest ban appears and thrives. And when religious jurists come under attack or lose their traditional role in society, the interest ban withers and dies.

To conclude, I call for a reconstruction of Weber’s theory of religion and economic morality that dissolves the tradition-modernity binary.

Résumé

Au cœur d’une industrie financière islamique de 2 billions de dollars se trouve la prohibition de l’usure. Mais pourquoi n’y a-t-il aujourd’hui qu’un rejet islamique du prêt à intérêt ? Après tout, pendant plus d’un millénaire, l’intérêt a été décrit dans le Judaïsme comme le Christianisme comme un péché grave. Si de nombreux auteurs ont étudié l’évolution de la moralité économique des principales religions, en les considérant le plus souvent isolément les unes des autres, peu depuis Weber ont réellement traité la question de l’intérêt de façon directe et comparative.

Cet article montre que le destin de la prohibition religieuse de l’usure a toujours été lié à celui des juristes religieux. Lorsque ces derniers sont absents, aucune interdiction systématique d’intérêt n’émerge. A l’inverse lorsqu’ils sont investis d’une forme d’expertise technique, l’interdiction de l’intérêt apparaît et se développe. Et lorsque les juristes religieux sont mis en cause ou perdent leur rôle traditionnel dans la société, l’interdiction de l’intérêt dépérit et disparaît. En conclusion cet article invite à une reconstruction de la théorie wébérienne de la religion et de la moralité économique qui s’affranchisse de l’opposition entre tradition et modernité.

Zusammenfassung

Im Herzen der zwei Billionen Dollar schweren islamischen Finanzindustrie befindet sich das Wucherverbot. Aber weshalb wird heute nur im Islam der Zinserwerb verworfen? Schließlich galt der Zinserwerb über ein Jahrtausend im Juden- und Christentum als Erbsünde. Haben zahlreiche Autoren die Entwicklung der wirtschaftlichen Moral der wichtigsten Religionen untersucht, meist von einander getrennt, sind es nur wenige, die sich seit Weber mit der Zinsfrage in direkter und vergleichender Weise auseinandergesetzt haben.

Dieser Aufsatz weist daraufhin, dass das Schicksal des religiösen Zinsverbots meist von dem der Religionsjuristen abhängig ist. Fehlen letztere bleibt ein systematisches Verbot aus. Werden sie als technische Spezialisten anerkannt, entsteht und entwickelt sich das Zinsverbot. Werden sie kritisiert oder in ihrer traditionellen gesellschaftlichen Rolle geschwächt, verkümmert das Zinsverbot um schließlich ganz zu verschwinden. Schlussfolgernd lädt der Aufsatz zu einem Neuaufbau der Weberianischen Religionstheorie und Wirtschaftsmoral ein, befreit vom Widerstand zwischen Tradition und Moderne.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Michael E Allsopp ., 1996. “Deontic and Epistemic Authority in Roman Catholic Ethics: The Case of Richard McCormick”, Christian Bioethics, 2 (1): 97-113.

William H Beezley ., 2008. “A Culture of Everyday Credit: Housekeeping, Pawnbroking, and Governance in Mexico City 1750-1920”, Hispanic American Historical Review, 88 (4): 713-714.

Robert N Bellah . 1999. “Max Weber and World-Denying Love: A Look at the Historical Sociology of Religion”, Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 67 (2): 277-304.

Amit Bhaduri , 1973. “A Study in Agricultural Backwardness Under Semi-Feudalism”, The Economic Journal, 83 (329): 120-137.

Frits J. A. Bouman and R. Houtman , 1988. “Pawnbroking as an Instrument of Rural Banking in the Third World”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 37 (1): 69-89.

Pierre Bourdieu , 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

James A Brundage ., 2008. The Medieval Origins of the Legal Profession: Canonists, Civilians, and Courts (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).

Andreas Buss , 1989. “The Economic Ethics of Russian-Orthodox Christianity: Part I”, International Sociology, 4 (3): 235-258.

Ryan Calder , 2010. “Short-Selling Replication in Islamic Finance: Innovation and Debate in Malaysia and Beyond”, in A. M. Venardos , ed., Current Issues in Islamic Banking and Finance: Resilience and Stability in the Present System (Singapore, World Scientific: 277-315).

Choucri Cardahi , 1955. “Le prêt à intérêt et l’usure au regard des législations antiques, de la morale catholique, du droit moderne et de la loi islamique”, Revue internationale de droit comparé, 7 (3): 499-541.

John P Caskey ., 1991. “Pawnbroking in America: The Economics of a Forgotten Credit Market”, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 23 (1): 85-99.

Michael R Cohen ., 2012. The Birth of Conservative Judaism: Solomon Schechter’s Disciples and the Creation of an American Religious Movement (New York, Columbia University Press).

Michael Coper , Tony Blackshield and George Williams , 2001. “Jurisprudence”, in Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (Oxford, Oxford University Press).

Raymond De Roover , 1955. “Scholastic Economics: Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69 (2): 161-190.

Helge Dedek , 2011. “The Splendour of Form: Scholastic Jurisprudence and ‘Irrational Formality’”, Law and Humanities, 5 (2): 349-383.

Christopher Dyer , 1989. Standards of Living in the Later Middle Ages: Social Change in England c. 1200-1520 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Melodie H Eichbauer . 2013. “Gratian’s Decretum and the Changing Historiographical Landscape”, History Compass, 11 (12): 1111-1125.

Mahmoud A El-Gamal ., 2006. Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Willem Floor , 2001. “The Economic Role of the Ulama in Qajar Persia” in L. S. Walbridge , ed., The Most Learned of the Shi‘a: The Institution of the Marja‘ Taqlid (Oxford, Oxford University Press: 53-81).

Haim Gerber , 1981. “Jews and Money-Lending in the Ottoman Empire”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, 72 (2): 100-118.

Shaikh M. Ghazanfar and A. Azim Islahi , 1990. “Economic Thought of an Arab Scholastic: Abu Hamid Al-Ghazali (AH 450-505/AD 1058-1111)”, History of Political Economy, 22 (2): 381-403.

Edward L. Glaeser and Jose A. Scheinkman , 1998. “Neither A Borrower nor A Lender be: An Economic Analysis of Interest Restrictions and Usury Laws 1”, The Journal of Law and Economics, 41 (1): 1-36.

Wael B Hallaq ., 1997. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Usul Al-Fiqh (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Wael B Hallaq ., 2009. Sharī‘a: Theory, Practice, Transformations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Martha Himmelfarb , 1997. “‘A Kingdom of Priests’: The Democratization of the Priesthood in the Literature of Second Temple Judaism”, The Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy, 6 (1): 89-104.

Hamid Hosseini , 1995. “Understanding the Market Mechanism before Adam Smith: Economic Thought in Medieval Islam”, History of Political Economy, 27 (3): 539-561.

Ronald C Jennings ., 1973. “Loans and Credit in Early 17th Century Ottoman Judicial Records: The Shariah Court of Anatolian Kayseri”, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 16 (2/3): 168-216.

Kwame S Jomo ., 1977. “Islam and Weber: Rodinson on the Implications of Religion for Capitalist Development”, The Developing Economies, 15 (2): 240-250.

Eric Jones , 2003. The European Miracle: Environments, Economies and Geopolitics in the History of Europe and Asia (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Lutz Kaelber , 2004. “Max Weber on Usury and Medieval Capitalism: From the History of Commercial Partnerships to the Protestant Ethic”, Max Weber Studies, 4 (1): 51-75.

Mohammad Hashim Kamali , 2007. “Commodity Futures: An Islamic Legal Analysis”, Thunderbird International Business Review, 49 (3): 309-339.

Mark Koyama , 2010. “Evading the ‘Taint of Usury’: The Usury Prohibition as a Barrier to Entry”, Explorations in Economic History, 47 (4): 420-442.

Angeliki E Laiou ., 2003. “Economic Concerns and Attitudes of the Intellectuals of Thessalonike”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 57: 205-223.

Odd Langholm , 1998. The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought: Antecedents of Choice and Power (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Robert S Lopez ., 1976. The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950-1350 (Cambridge, England, Cambridge University Press).

Robert P Maloney ., 1973. “The Teaching of the Fathers on Usury: An Historical Study on the Development of Christian Thinking”, Vigiliae Christianae, 27 (4): 241-265.

Nathan Matthews , 1921. “The Valuation of Property in the Roman Law”, Harvard Law Review, 34 (3): 229-259.

Mansoor Moaddel , 2001. “Conditions for Ideological Production: The Origins of Islamic Modernism in India, Egypt, and Iran”, Theory and Society, 30 (5): 669-731.

Jacob Neusner , 1973. “Pharisaic-Rabbinic Judaism: A Clarification”, History of Religions, 12 (3): 250-270.

Roman Ohrenstein and Barry Gordon , 2009. Economic Analysis in Talmudic Literature: Rabbinic Thought in the Light of Modern Economics, third revised edition (Leiden, Brill).

Eric A Posner ., 1995. “Contract Law in the Welfare State: A Defense of the Unconscionability Doctrine, Usury Laws, and Related Limitations on the Freedom to Contract”, Journal of Legal Studies, 24: 283-319.

Nicholas D Ray ., 1997. “The Medieval Islamic System of Credit and Banking: Legal and Historical Considerations”, Arab Law Quarterly, 12 (1): 43-90.

Clyde G. Reed and Cliff T. Bekar , 2003. “Religious Prohibitions Against Usury”, Explorations in Economic History, 40 (4): 347-368.

Christof Rolker , 2010. Canon Law and the Letters of Ivo of Chartres (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Jared Rubin , 2011. “Institutions, the Rise of Commerce and the Persistence of Laws: Interest Restrictions in Islam and Christianity”, The Economic Journal, 121 (557): 1310-1339.

Daromir Rudnyckyj , 2014. “Economy in Practice: Islamic Finance and the Problem of Market Reason”, American Ethnologist, 41 (1): 110-127.

Morris Silver , 1983. Prophets and Markets: The Political Economy of Ancient Israel (Boston, Kluwer-Nijhoff).

Elaine S Tan ., 2002. “An Empty Shell? Rethinking the Usury Laws in Medieval Europe”, The Journal of Legal History, 23 (3): 177-196.

Abraham L Udovitch ., 1970. Partnership and Profit in Medieval Islam (Princeton, Princeton University Press).

Robert R Wilson . 1983. “Israel’s Judicial System in the Preexilic Period”, The Jewish Quarterly Review, 74 (2): 229-248.

Anders Winroth , 2000. The Making of Gratian’s Decretum (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

John Witte , 2002. Law and Protestantism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Wendy A Woloson ., 2007. “In Hock: Pawning in Early America”, Journal of the Early Republic, 27 (1): 35-81.

Diana Wood , 2002. Medieval Economic Thought (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 86 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 465 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th September 2016 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.