Skip to main content

Power, Boundaries and Institutions: Marriage in Ultra-Orthodox Judaism*

  • David Lehmann (a1) and Batia Siebzehner (a2)

The growth in the numbers and influence of ultra-Orthodoxy – the haredim – since the Second World War has changed Judaism worldwide, even though it remains a minority culture. Growth has occurred through the maximization of family size and through the movement of t'shuva (“return”), and it has benefited from state and private subsidies to the institutions of Torah learning (yeshivot and schooling generally), which have become one of the twin pillars of ultra-Orthodoxy. The other pillar is the shidduch, the system of concerted marriage which ensures that more or less everyone gets married, and strengthens the educational institutions which inculcate among prospective brides a preference for a learned husband engaged in full-time study, and for a life devoted to sustaining him.


La croissance en nombre et en influence des groupes ultra-orthodoxes (haredim) depuis la Seconde Guerre mondiale, pour minoritaires qu'ils soient, a changé la face du judaïsme de par le monde. Leur accroissement vient d'un taux sans précédent de natalité, du mouvement de t'shuva (retour ou repentir) et des subventions publiques et privées accordées à l'enseignement de la Torah dans les yeshivot et autres écoles. On a là le premier des deux piliers de l'ultra-orthodoxie. Le second pilier est le shidduch, système de mariages concertés, qui garantit que tous les membres ou presque puissent se marier ; il est renforcé par les institutions éducatives qui inculquent aux jeunes filles une préférence pour un mari érudit qui consacre sa vie à l'étude, avec pour corollaire l'obligation pour elles de le maintenir économiquement.


Der Anstieg und Einfluss ultraorthodoxer Gruppen (haredim), selbst wenn sie in der Minderheit sind, hat seit dem zweiten Weltkrieg das Judentum weltweit verändert. Der Anstieg erklärt sich aus der Kinderzahl, einer t'shuva (retum) Bewegung und den öffentlichen, wie privaten Subventionen, die dem Torahstudium in den yeshivot und anderen Schulen zugute gekommen sind. Es handelt sich um den ersten der beiden Hauptpfeiler des Ultraorthodoxismus. Der zweite ist der shidduch, Heiratsverträge, die es allen oder fast allen ihrer Mitglieder erlauben zu heiraten; er stärkt die Bildungsinstanzen, die die jungen Mädchen glauben machen, daß sie einen gebildeteten Mann, der sich ganz dem Studium widmet, vorziehen sollen, mit der Folge, daß sie ihn unterhalten müssen.

Hide All
Algazi Gadi, 2006. “Offshore Zionism”, New Left Review, 40, pp. 27-37.
Aviad Janet, 1983. Return to Judaism: Religious Renewal in Israel (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
BankofIsrael, 2005. Annual Report.
BankofIsrael, 2006. Annual Report.
Beit-Hallahmi Benjamin, 1991. “Back to the Fold: the Return to Judaism”, in Beit-Hallahmi Benjamin and Sobel Zvi, eds., Jewishness and Judaism in Contemporary Israel (Albany, SUNY).
Berman Eli, 2000. “Sect, Subsidy, and Sacrifice: An Economist's View of Ultra-Orthodox Jews”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115 (3), pp. 905-953.
Breuer Mordechai, 1996. The Early Modern Period. German-Jewish History in Modern Times. (M. Meyer, New York, Columbia University Press, 1).
Bronner Leila L., 1993. “From Veil to Wig: Jewish Women's Hair Covering”, Judaism: a Quarterly Journal of Jewish Life and Thought, Fall.
Comaroff Jean, 1985. Body of Power, Spirit of Resistance: the Culture and History of a South African People (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Daube David, 1977. The Duty of Procreation (Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press).
Dynner Glenn, 2006. Men of Silk: the Hasidic Conquest of Polish Jewish Society (Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press).
Eisenstadt Shmuel N., 2000. “Multiple Modernities”, Daedalus, 129 (1), pp. 1-29.
El-Or Tamar, 1993. “The Length of the Slits and the Spread of Luxury: Reconstructing the Subordination of Ultra-Orthodox Jewish Women through the Patriarchy of Men Scholars”, Sex Roles, 29 (9-10), pp. 585-598.
Freeze ChaeRan Y., 2002. Jewish Marriage and Divorce in Imperial Russia (London, Brandeis University Press).
Friedman Menachem, 1986. “Life Tradition and Book Tradition in the Development of Ultra-Orthodox Judaism”, in Goldberg Harvey, ed., Judaism Viewed From Within and From Without. Anthropological Studies (Albany, N.Y, SUNY Press, pp. 235-255).
Friedman Menachem, 1988. “Back to Grandmother: the Ultra-Orthodox Woman”, Israel Studies, Spring, pp. 21-26.
Friedman Menachem, 1993. “The Lost Kiddush Cup: Changes in Ashkenazic Haredi Culture – a Tradition in Crisis”, in Wertheimer Jack, ed., The Uses of Tradition: Jewish Continuity in the Modern Era (Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, for the Jewish Theological Seminary of America).
Friedman Menachem, 1994. “Habad as Messianic Fundamentalism: from Local Particularism to Universal Jewish Mission”, in Marty Martin and Appleby R. Scott, eds., Accounting for Fundamentalisms: the Dynamic Character of Movements (Chicago, Chicago University Press).
Friedman Menachem, 1995. “The Structural Foundation for the Religio-Political Accomodation in Israel: Fallacy and Reality”, in Troen S. Ilan and Lucas Noah, Israel: the First Decade of Independence (Albany, SUNY Press).
Graham David, Schmool Marlena et al. , 2007. Jews in Britain: a Snapshot from the 2001 Census (Institute for Jewish Policy Research).
Hundert Gershon, 2004. Jews in Poland-Lithuania in the Eighteenth Century: a Genealogy of Modernity (Berkeley, University of California Press).
Katz Jacob, 1961. Tradition and Crisis: Jewish Society at the End of the Middle Ages (Glencoe, Free Press).
Katz Jacob, 1973. Out of the Ghetto: the Social Background of Jewish Emancipation, 1770-1870 (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Lehmann David, 2008. “The Miraculous Economics of Religion: an Essay in Social Capital”, Social Compass, 55 (4), pp. 457-477 [French].
Lehmann David and Siebzehner Batia, 2006. Remaking Israeli Judaism: the Challenge of Shas (London, Hurst).
Lowenstein Steven, 1997. “The Community”, in Meyer Michael A., ed., German-Jewish History in Modern Times (New York, Columbia University).
Martin David, 2001. Pentecostalism: the World their Parish (Oxford, Blackwells).
Maxwell David, 2006. African Gifts of the Spirit: Pentecostalism & the Rise of a Zimbabwean Transnational religious Movement (Oxford, James Currey).
McAdam Doug, McCarthy John D. et al. , 1996. Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Mintz Jerome, 1992. Hasidic People: a Place in the New World (Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press).
Putnam Robert D., 2000. Bowling Alone: the Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York, Simon and Schuster).
Rebibo Joel, 2001. “The Road Back from Utopia”, Azure, Summer, pp. 131-167.
Sholem Gershom, 1961. Main Trends in Jewish Mysticism (New York, Schocken).
Soloveitchik Haym, 1994. “Rupture and Reconstruction: the Transformation of Contemporary Orthodoxy”, Tradition, 28 (4), pp. 64-130.
Stadler Nurit, 2009. Yeshiva Fundamentalism: Piety, Gender, and Resistance in the Ultra-Orthodox World (New York, New York University Press).
Stark Rodney and Bainbridge William S., 1987. A Theory of Religion (New York, P. Lang).
Stolow Jeremy, 2006. “Communicating Authority, Consuming Authority: Jewish Orthodox Outreach Literature and its Reading Public”, in Meyer Birgit and Moors Annelies, eds., Religion, Media and the Pubic Sphere (Bloomington, Indiana University Press, pp. 73-90).
Topel Marta, 2008. Jerusalem and São Paulo: the New Jewish Orthodoxy in Focus (Lanham (MD), University Press of America).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 78 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 678 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.