Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Muthukrishna, Michael and Henrich, Joseph 2016. Innovation in the collective brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 371, Issue. 1690, p. 20150192.

    De Santis, Angelo Cianchini, Gianfranco and Di Giovambattista, Rita 2015. Accelerating moment release revisited: Examples of application to Italian seismic sequences. Tectonophysics, Vol. 639, p. 82.

    Šesták, Jaroslav 2015. Šesták–Berggren equation: now questioned but formerly celebrated—what is right. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry,

    Barreiro, Enrique Wulff 2014. Trk Family Neurotrophin Receptors and p75 Receptor. A Multiple Competing Hypothesis Case in the Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) History. Advances in Historical Studies, Vol. 03, Issue. 02, p. 93.

    Hannah, David Parent, Michael Pitt, Leyland and Berthon, Pierre 2014. It's a secret: Marketing value and the denial of availability. Business Horizons, Vol. 57, Issue. 1, p. 49.

    Sanderson, Susan Walsh and Simons, Kenneth L. 2014. Light emitting diodes and the lighting revolution: The emergence of a solid-state lighting industry. Research Policy, Vol. 43, Issue. 10, p. 1730.

    Ganning, Joanna P. Flint, Courtney G. and Gasteyer, Stephen 2012. A case study from the post-new deal state agricultural experiment station system: a life of mixed signals in southern Illinois. Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 29, Issue. 4, p. 493.

    Gill, Bernhard Brandl, Barbara Böschen, Stefan and Schneider, Michael 2012. Autorisierung. Eine wissenschafts- und wirtschaftssoziologische Perspektive auf geistiges Eigentum. Berliner Journal für Soziologie, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 407.

    Ding, Waverly W. 2011. The Impact of Founders' Professional-Education Background on the Adoption of Open Science by For-Profit Biotechnology Firms. Management Science, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 257.

    Laszlo, Pierre 2010. Quality Information from the Grapevine. Ambix, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 202.

    Burnham, John C. 2008. Accident Proneness (Unfallneigung): A Classic Case of Simultaneous Discovery/Construction in Psychology. Science in Context, Vol. 21, Issue. 01,

    Stuart, Toby E. and Ding, Waverly W. 2006. When Do Scientists Become Entrepreneurs? The Social Structural Antecedents of Commercial Activity in the Academic Life Sciences1. American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 112, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Zuckerman, Harriet 1989. The Other Merton Thesis. Science in Context, Vol. 3, Issue. 01,

    Roskens, Ronald W. 1983. Implications of Biglan model research for the process of faculty advancement. Research in Higher Education, Vol. 18, Issue. 3, p. 285.

    Kragh, Helge 1980. Anatomy of a Priority Conflict: The Case of Element 72. Centaurus, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 275.

    Lécuyer, Bernard-Pierre 1978. Bilan et perspectives de la sociologie de la science dans les pays occidentaux. European Journal of Sociology, Vol. 19, Issue. 02, p. 257.

    Pinto, James V. 1977. LAUNHARDT AND LOCATION THEORY: REDISCOVERY OF A NEGLECTED BOOK. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    Wilder, R.L 1974. Hereditary stress as a cultural force in mathematics. Historia Mathematica, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 29.

    Downey, Kenneth J. 1969. The Scientific Community: Organic or Mechanical?. The Sociological Quarterly, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 438.

    Coser, Rose Laub 1967. Evasiveness as a response to structural ambivalence. Social Science & Medicine (1967), Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 203.


Resistance to the Systematic Study of Multiple Discoveries in Science


The pages of the history of science record thousands of instances of similar discoveries having been made by scientists working independently of one another. Sometimes the discoveries are simultaneous or almost so; sometimes a scientist will make anew a discovery which, unknown to him, somebody else had made years before. Such occurrences suggest that discoveries become virtually inevitable when prerequisite kinds of knowledge and tools accumulate in man's cultural store and when the attention of an appreciable number of investigators becomes focussed on a problem, by emerging social needs, by developments internal to the science, or by both. Since at least 1917, when the anthropologist A. L. Kroeber published his influential paper dealing in part with the subject (I) and especially since 1922, when the sociologists William F. Ogburn and Dorothy S. Thomas compiled a list of some 150 cases of multiple independent discoveries and inventions (2), this hypothesis has become firmly established in sociological thought.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bernhard J. Stern , Society and Medical Progress (Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1941)

Bernard Barber , “Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery”, Science, 09 1, 1961, 134, 596602

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *