Skip to main content

Varieties of Capitalism and Capitalism « tout court »

  • Dorothee Bohle (a1) and Béla Greskovits (a2)

The article reviews the “Varieties of Capitalism” (VoC) approach and its large impact on the field of comparative political economy. It situates the approach within the field, and stresses its specificities. The article argues that VoC's firm-centeredness, parsimony, and reliance on conceptual tools borrowed from economics, fit better than other approaches to a Zeitgeist formed in the context of the demise of Western capitalism's alternatives, and the globalization-induced shift of societies’ center of gravity away from politics towards firms and markets. The article then revisits major debates that have followed the publication of the seminal Hall-Soskice book. The debates have revealed that VoC's greatest strengths, in the end, turn out to be obstacles when it comes to analyzing problems of contemporary capitalism.


L'article revient sur les textes de l'approche Variétés du capitalisme qui a eu un impact important en économie politique comparative. La focalisation sur l'entreprise, le caractère rudimentaire et l'emprunt d'outils conceptuels aux économistes conviennent bien à l'esprit d'un temps (Zeigeist) où l'on a renoncé à chercher une alternative au capitalisme occidental et où, globalisation aidant, le centre de gravité des sociétés se déplace du politique vers la firme et le marché. Vient ensuite une revue des grands débats qui ont suivi la publication du livre pionnier de Hall et Soskice. Finalement, les éléments forts de l'approche VoC se sont révélés des obstacles à l'analyse des problèmes du capitalisme contemporain.


Der Artikel gibt einen Überblick über den einflussreichen „Varieties of Capitalism” (VoC) Ansdentz. Er verortet ihn im Feld der vergleiche den politischen Ökonomie und argumentiert, daß der Fokus auf Unternehmen, die scheinbare Einfachheit und Eleganz der Argumentation, und die breite Anwendung von aus der Ökonomie entliehenen Konzepten einem wissenschaftlichen Zeitgeist entspricht, der von dem Zusammenbruch der Alternativen zum westlichen Kapitalismus und von Globalisierung und der mit ihr einhergehenden Verschiebung gesellschaftlicher Machtzentren in Richtung Unternehmen und Märkte geprägt ist. Im zweiten Teil befaßt sich der Artikel mit einigen Debatten, die der Ansatz ausgelöst hat. Der Artikel fragt auch, inwieweit VoC in der Lage ist, Globalisierung, europäische Integration und neu entstehende Kapitalismusvarianten zu erfassen. Diese Debatten machen deutlich, daß die Stärken des VoC Ansatzes sich in Hindernisse verwandeln, wenn Probleme des gegenwärtigen Kapitalismus analysiert werden sollen.

Hide All
Aglietta Michel, 1979. A Theory of Capitalist Regulation: The US Experience (London, Verso).
Amable Bruno, 2003. The Diversity of Modern Capitalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Amable Bruno and Palombarini Stefano, 2009. “A neorealist approach to institutional change and the diversity of capitalism”, Socio-Economic Review, 7, pp.123-143.
Amsden Alice, 2001. The Rise of “the Rest”. Challenges to the West from Late-Industrializing Economies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Bartolini Stefano, 2007. Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring between the Nation-State and the European Union (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Beckert Jens, 2008. The Social Order of Markets (Köln, Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Working paper 08/01).
Bluhm Katharina, 2007. Experimentierfeld Ostmitteleuropa? Deutsche Unternehmen in Polen und der Tschechischen Republik (Wiesbaden, VS-Verlag).
Bohle Dorothee and Greskovits Béla, 2007. “Neoliberalism, Embedded Neoliberalism, and Neocorporatism: Towards Transnational Capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe”, West European Politics, 30 (3), May, pp. 443-466.
Boyer Robert, 1986. La Théorie de la régulation. Une analyse critique (Paris, La Decouverte).
Boyer Robert and Durand Jean-Pierre, 1997. After Fordism (London, Macmillan Business).
Buchen Clemens, 2007. “Estonia and Slovenia as Antipodes”, in Lane David and Myant Martin, eds, Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 65-89).
Cernat Lucien, 2002. “Institutions and Economic Growth: Which Model of Capitalism for Central and Eastern Europe?Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition, 6, pp. 18-34.
Crouch Colin, 2005. Capitalist Diversity and Change (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Crouch Colin, Streeck Wolfgang, Boyer Robert, Amable Bruno and Jackson Gregory, 2005. “Dialogue on Institutional Complementarity and Political Economy”, Socio-Economic Review, 3, pp. 359-382.
Cusack Thomas, Iversen Torben and Soskice David, 2007. “Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems” (Berlin, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, Discussion Paper 07/07).
Djelic Marie-Laure and Quack Sigrid, eds., 2003. Globalization and Institutions. Redefining the Rules of the Economic Game (Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar).
Ebbinghaus Bernhard and Manow Philip, eds., 2001. Comparing Welfare Capitalism. Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the US (Milton Park, Routledge).
Eckstein Alexander, ed., 1971. Comparison of Economic Systems. Theoretical and Methodological Approaches (Berkeley, University of California Press).
Esping-Andersen Gösta, 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism (Cambridge, Polity Press).
Estevez-Abe Margarita, Iversen Torben and Soskice David, 2001. “Social Protection and the Formation of Skills: A Reinterpretation of the Welfare State”, in Hall Peter A. and Soskice David, eds., Varieties of Capitalism, pp. 145-183.
Evans Peter, Rueschemeyer Dietrich and Skocpol Theda, eds., 1985. Bringing the State Back In (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Feldmann Magnus, 2007. “The Origins of Varieties of Capitalism: Lessons from Post-Socialist Transition in Estonia and Slovenia”, in Hancké Bob et al. , Beyond Varieties of Capitalism, (New York, Oxford Univrsity Press, pp. 328-350).
Frieden Jeffry and Rogowski Ronald, 1996. “The Impact of the International Economy on National Policies: An Analytical Overview”, in Keohane Robert O. and Milner Helen, eds, Internationalization and Domestic Politics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 25-47).
Fukuyama Francis, 1992. The End of History and the Last Man (New York, Free Press).
Gereffi Gary, 1995. “Global Production Systems and Third World Development”, in Stallings Barbara, ed., Global Change, Regional Response (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 100-142).
Gerschenkron Alexander, [1962] 1976. Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective (Cambridge, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).
Goldthorpe John, ed., 1984. Order and Conflict In Contemporary Capitalism (Oxford, Clarendon Press).
Gourevitch Peter, 1986. Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).
Gray John, 1998. False Dawn: The Delusions of Global Capitalism. (London, Granta Books).
Hall Peter A., 1997. “The Role of Interests, Institutions, and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of Industrialized Nations”, in Lichbach Mark and Zuckerman Alan, eds., Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture, and Structure (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 174-207).
Hall Peter A., 2007. “The Evolution of Varieties of Capitalism in Europe”, in Hancké Bob et al. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism (New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 39-85).
Hall Peter A. and Gingerich David, 2004. “Varieties of Capitalism and Institutional Complementarities in the Macroeconomy: An Empirical Analysis”, (Köln, Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Discussion paper 04/05).
Hall Peter A. and Soskice David, eds., 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Hall Peter A. and Thelen Kathleen, 2009. “Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism”, Socio-Economic Review, 7, pp. 7-34.
Hall Peter A., Rhodes Martin and Thatcher Mark, eds., 2007. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism. Conflict, Contradictions, and Complementarities in the European Economy (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Hay Colin, 2004. “Common Trajectories, Variable Paces, Divergent Outcomes? Models of European Capitalism under Conditions of Complex Economic InterdependenceReview of International Political Economy, 11 (2), pp. 231-262.
Hirschman Albert, 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty. Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Hirschman Albert, 1981. Essays in Trespassing. Economics to Politics and Beyond (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Hiscox Michael, 2002. International Trade and Domestic Conflict (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Hollingsworth Roger and Boyer Robert, eds., 1997. Contemporary Capitalism. The Embeddedness of Institutions (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Hollingsworth Roger, Schmitter Philippe and Streeck Wolfgang, eds., 1994. Governing Capitalist Economies. Performance and Control of Economic Sectors (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Höpner Martin, 2005. “What Connects Industrial Relations with Corporate Governance? Explaining Complementarity”, Socio-Economic Review, 3 (2), pp. 331-358.
Iversen Torben, 2005. Capitalism, Democracy, and Welfare (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Iversen Torben and Soskice David, 2001. “An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences”, American Political Science Review, 95 (4), december, pp. 875-892.
Jackson Gregory and Deeg Richard, 2006. “How Many Varieties of Capitalism? Comparing the Comparative Institutional Analyses of Capitalist Diversity” (Köln, Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Discussion paper 06/02).
Katzenstein Peter, 1985. Small States in World Markets (Ithaca, Cornell University Press).
Kitschelt Herbert, 2006. “Collective Group Interests and Distributive Outcomes: Competing Claims about the Evolution of the Welfare State”. Contribution to the Labor History Symposium on Capitalism, Democracy and Welfare, by Torben Iversen, Labor History, 47 (3), pp. 411-419.
Kitschelt Herbert, Lange Peter, Marks Gary and Stephens John, 1999. “Convergence and Divergence in Advanced Capitalist Democracies”, in Kitschelt H., Lange P., Marks G. and Stephens J., eds., Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Knell Mark and Srholec Martin, 2007. “Diverging Pathways in Central and Eastern Europe”, in Lane David and Myant Martin, eds., Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries (Houndmills, Palgrave, pp. 40-64).
Kornai János, 1980. Economics of Shortage (Amsterdam, North-Holland).
Lane David, 2005. “Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Former State Socialist Societies”, Competition and Change, 3, pp. 227-247.
Maurice Marc, Sellier Francois and Silvestre Jean-Jacques, 1986. The Social Foundations of Industrial Power. A Comparison of France and Germany (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
McMenamin Iain, 2004. “Varieties of Capitalist Democracy: What Difference does East-Central Europe Make?Journal of Public Policy, 3, pp. 259-274.
Mykhnenko Vlad, 2007. “Strengths and Weaknesses of ‘Weak’ Coordination: Economic Institutions, Revealed Comparative Advantages, and Socio-Economic Performance of Mixed Market Economies in Poland and Ukraine”, in Hancké Bob et al. Beyond Varieties of Capitalism (New York, Oxford University press, pp. 351-378).
Nölke Andreas and Vliegenthart Arjan, 2009. “Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe”, World Politics, 61 (4), October, pp. 670-702.
Ohmae Kenichi, 1994. The Borderless World: Power and Strategy in the Global Marketplace (London, Harper Collins).
Olson Mancur, 1971. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Economic Groups (Cambridge, Harvard University Press).
Piore Michael J. and Sabel Charles F., 1986. The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity (New York, Basic Books).
Polanyi Karl, [1944] 1957. The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time (Boston, Beacon).
Pontusson Jonas, 1995. “From Comparative Public Policy to Political Economy: Putting Institutions in Their Place and Taking Interests Seriously”, Comparative Political Studies, 28, pp. 117-147.
Porter Michael, 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York, Free Press).
Rokkan Stein, 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development(Oslo: Universitetsforlaget).
Scharpf Fritz, 1997. “Balancing Positive and Negative Integration: The Regulatory Options for Europe” (Köln, Max-Planck Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, MPIfG Working Paper 97/8).
Schmidt Vivien, 2002. The Futures of European Capitalism (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Schmitter Philippe, 1990. “Sectors in Modern Capitalism: Modes of Governance and Variations in Performance”, in Brunetta Renato and Dell-Arringa Carlo, eds., Labour Relations and Economic Performance (Houndmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 3-39).
Schmitter Philippe C. and Lehmbruch Gerhard, eds., 1979. Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation (Beverly Hills, Sage).
Shonfield Andrew, 1965. Modern Capitalism. The Changing Balance of Public and Private Power (London, Oxford University Press).
Stark David and Bruszt László, 1998. Postsocialist Pathways. Transforming Politics and Property in East Central Europe (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Streeck Wolfgang, 2009. Re-Forming Capitalism. Institutional Change in the German Political Economy (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Streeck Wolfgang and Thelen Kathleen, 2005. Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Thelen Kathleen, 2004. How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
Wade Robert, 1990. Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, Princeton University Press).
Whitley Richard, 2007. Business Sytems and Organizational Capabilities. The Institutional Structuring of Competitive Competencies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Wood Stewart, 2001. “Business, Government, and Patterns of Labor Market Policy in Britain and the Federal Republic of Germany”, in Peter A Hall and Soskice David, Varieties of Capitalism (New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 247-277).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie
  • ISSN: 0003-9756
  • EISSN: 1474-0583
  • URL: /core/journals/european-journal-of-sociology-archives-europeennes-de-sociologie
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 113 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 397 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.