Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
de Fine Licht, Jenny
2014.
Policy Area as a Potential Moderator of Transparency Effects: An Experiment.
Public Administration Review,
Vol. 74,
Issue. 3,
p.
361.
Gold, Valentin
El-Assady, Mennatallah
Bögel, Tina
Rohrdantz, Christian
Butt, Miriam
Holzinger, Katharina
and
Keim, Daniel
2015.
Visual Linguistic Analysis of Political Discussions: Measuring Deliberative Quality.
Digital Scholarship in the Humanities,
p.
fqv033.
von Schoultz, Åsa
2015.
Nordic Research on Political Behaviour.
Scandinavian Political Studies,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
342.
Nielsen, Julie Hassing
2016.
Do Group Decision Rules Affect Trust? A Laboratory Experiment on Group Decision Rules and Trust.
Scandinavian Political Studies,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
115.
Ravazzi, Stefania
2017.
When a government attempts to institutionalize and regulate deliberative democracy: the how and why from a process-tracing perspective.
Critical Policy Studies,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 1,
p.
79.
Pritzlaff-Scheele, Tanja
2017.
Between “Apparent Unanimity” and Majority Vote – A Political Micro-ethnography of Committee Decision-Making.
Négociations,
Vol. n° 27,
Issue. 1,
p.
129.
El‐Assady, Mennatallah
Sevastjanova, Rita
Gipp, Bela
Keim, Daniel
and
Collins, Christopher
2017.
NEREx: Named‐Entity Relationship Exploration in Multi‐Party Conversations.
Computer Graphics Forum,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 3,
p.
213.
Langenbach, Pascal
and
Tausch, Franziska
2017.
Inherited Institutions: Cooperation in the Light of Democratic Legitimacy.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Arnesen, Sveinung
2017.
Legitimacy from Decision-Making Influence and Outcome Favourability: Results from General Population Survey Experiments.
Political Studies,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 1_suppl,
p.
146.
Gastil, John
2018.
The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation.
Annual Review of Law and Social Science,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
271.
Seyd, Ben
Curtice, John
and
Rose, Jonathan
2018.
How might reform of the political system appeal to discontented citizens?.
The British Journal of Politics and International Relations,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
263.
Marien, Sofie
and
Kern, Anna
2018.
The Winner Takes It All: Revisiting the Effect of Direct Democracy on Citizens’ Political Support.
Political Behavior,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 4,
p.
857.
Altman, David
2018.
Citizenship and Contemporary Direct Democracy.
Clayton, Amanda
O'Brien, Diana Z.
and
Piscopo, Jennifer M.
2019.
All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
113.
Langenbach, Pascal
and
Tausch, Franziska
2019.
Inherited Institutions: Cooperation in the Light of Democratic Legitimacy.
The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 2,
p.
364.
JÄSKE, MAIJA
2019.
Participatory innovations and maxi‐publics: The influence of participation possibilities on perceived legitimacy at the local level in Finland.
European Journal of Political Research,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
603.
Esaiasson, Peter
Persson, Mikael
Gilljam, Mikael
and
Lindholm, Torun
2019.
Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision Acceptance.
British Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 1,
p.
291.
Arnesen, Sveinung
Broderstad, Troy S
Johannesson, Mikael P
and
Linde, Jonas
2019.
Conditional legitimacy: How turnout, majority size, and outcome affect perceptions of legitimacy in European Union membership referendums.
European Union Politics,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 2,
p.
176.
Mazepus, Honorata
and
van Leeuwen, Florian
2020.
Fairness matters when responding to disasters: An experimental study of government legitimacy.
Governance,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 3,
p.
621.
Holbein, John B.
and
Rangel, Marcos A.
2020.
Does Voting Have Upstream and Downstream Consequences? Regression Discontinuity Tests of the Transformative Voting Hypothesis.
The Journal of Politics,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 4,
p.
1196.