Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-rcd7l Total loading time: 0.205 Render date: 2021-10-19T15:33:52.282Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

European integration, party strategies, and state restructuring: a comparative analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2013

Paolo Dardanelli*
Affiliation:
School of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

Abstract

To what extent and in what way does European integration fuel state restructuring? This is a long-standing but still not a fully answered question. While the theoretical literature suggests a positive link between the two, previous empirical studies have reached contrasting conclusions. The article offers an alternative testing of the proposition, centred on the role of party strategies as a causal mechanism, analysed across space and time. On the cross-sectional axis, it focusses on parties in Flanders and Wallonia (Belgium), Lombardy and Sicily (Italy), Catalonia and Andalusia (Spain), and Scotland and Wales (United Kingdom). On the cross-temporal axis, it focuses on four critical junctures connecting integration and state restructuring. It analyses the degree to which ‘Europe’ has been strategically used in connection to state restructuring and which conditions have been necessary and/or sufficient to that outcome. The analysis has been conducted on the basis of a Qualitative Comparative Analysis methodology. Five main results emerge: (1) overall, parties have generally exploited ‘Europe’ in connection with state restructuring to a limited extent only but in a few cases exploitation has been very intense and intimately linked to strategic turning points; (2) ‘Europe’ has overwhelmingly been used to support state restructuring; (3) the most intense use has been made by regional parties with a secessionist position and positive attitude to the EU; (4) ‘use of Europe’ is a product of a complex conjunctural effect of several conditions; (5) it has increased over time but is not a linear product of integration, a sharp drop can be observed between the two most recent time points. These findings show that European integration can indeed exercise causal influence upon state restructuring via party strategies but that this is highly contingent on the complex interaction of multiple factors.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesina, A. Spolaore, E. (1997), ‘On the number and size of nations’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 10271056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, A. Spolaore, E. (2003), The Size of Nations, Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Spolaore, E. Wacziarg, R. (2000), ‘Economic integration and political disintegration’, The American Economic Review 90(5): 12761296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, S. (2012), Challenging the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. (1991), ‘Skeptical reflections on a Europe of regions: Britain, Germany, and the ERDF’, Journal of Public Policy 10(4): 417447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. Goodman, J. (1995), ‘Regions, states and the European Union: modernist reaction or postmodern adaptation?, Review of International Political Economy 2(4): 600631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S. (2005), Restructuring Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskaran, T. (2010), ‘Supranational integration and national reorganization: on the Maastricht Treaty's impact on fiscal decentralization in EU countries’, Constitutional Political Economy 21(4): 309335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, A. (1978), ‘Minority nationalist movements and theories of political integration’, World Politics 30(3): 325344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogdanor, V. (1999), Devolution in the United Kingdom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bolton, P. Roland, G. (1997), ‘The breakup of nations: a political economy analysis’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 10571090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, T. (2002), States and Regions in the European Union – Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Breuning, M. Ishiyama, J. (1998), ‘The rhetoric of nationalism: rhetorical strategies of the Volksunie and Vlaams Blok in Belgium, 1991–1995’, Political Communication 15(1): 526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I. (2001), ‘Theory and measurement of party policy positions’, in I. Budge, H.-D. Klingemann, A. Volkens, J. Bara and E. Tanenbaum (eds), Mapping Policy Preferences, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 7590.Google Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. Tanenbaum, E. (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caramani, D. (2004), The Nationalization of Politics – The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cotta, M. Verzichelli, L. (2007), Political Institutions in Italy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowles, M.G., Caporaso, J. Risse, T. (2001), Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Dardanelli, P. (2009), ‘Europeanization as heresthetics – party competition over self-government for Scotland, 1974–97’, Party Politics 15(1): 4968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschouwer, K. (2009), The Politics of Belgium, Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
De Winter, L. Gomez-Reino Cachafeiro, M. (2002), ‘European integration and ethnoregionalist parties’, Party Politics 8(4): 483503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinan, D. (2010), Ever Closer Union, 4th edn., Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, A. (2009), Minority Nationalist Parties and European Integration, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Featherstone, K. Radaelli, C. (eds) (2003), The Politics of Europeanization, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, W. (1975), ‘Subnational Regionalism and the European Community’, Orbis 18(4): 11761192.Google Scholar
Fraeys, W. (1969), ‘Les élections du 31 mars 1968’, Res Publica 11(1): 271292.Google Scholar
Garrett, G. Rodden, J. (2003), ‘Globalization and fiscal decentralization’, in M. Kahler and D. Lake (eds), Governance in a Global Economy, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, pp. 87109.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. (2003), ‘The substantive importance of necessary conditions hypotheses’, in G. Goertz and H. Starr (eds), Necessary Conditions, Lenham, MD, USA: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 6594.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. Starr, H. (2003), ‘Introduction: necessary condition logics, research design, and theory’, in Idem (ed.), Necessary Conditions, Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman and Littlefield, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Gunther, R. Montero, J.R. (2009), The Politics of Spain, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hepburn, E. (2010), Using Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Hix, S. Goetz, K. (2000), ‘Introduction: European integration and national political systems’, West European Politics 23(4): 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooghe, L. (1996), ‘Building a Europe with the regions: the changing role of the European commission’, in Idem (ed.), Cohesion Policy and European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 89126.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L. Marks, G. (2001), Multi-Level Governance and European Integration, Lanham, MD, USA: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hooghe, L., Schakel, A. Marks, G. (2008), ‘Appendix B: country and regional scores’, Regional and Federal Studies 18(2–3): 259274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jolly, S.K. (2007), ‘The Europhile fringe? Regionalist party support for European integration’, European Union Politics 8(1): 109130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, B. (1995), ‘Conclusion’, in B. Jones and M. Keating (eds), The European Union and the Regions, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 289296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, M. (1995), ‘Europeanism and regionalism’, in B. Jones and M. Keating (eds), The European Union and the Regions, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 122.Google Scholar
Keating, M. (2001), Plurinational Democracy – Stateless Nations in a Post-sovereignty Era, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellas, J. (1991), ‘European Integration and the Regions’, Parliamentary Affairs 44(2): 226239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladrech, R. (1994), ‘Europeanization of domestic politics and institutions: the case of France’, Journal of Common Market Studies 32(1): 6998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladrech, R. (2010), Europeanization and National Politics, Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laible, J. (2008), Separatism and Sovereignty in the New Europe, New York, NY, USA: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lecours, A. (2000), ‘Ethnonationalism in the West: a theoretical exploration’, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 6(1): 103124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, J. (1996), ‘“Europe of the Regions” and the federalization of Europe’, Publius 26(4): 141162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, P. (1996), Minority Nationalism and European Integration, Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Marks, G. (1993), ‘Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC’, in A. Cafruny and G. Rosenthal (eds), The State of the European Community, Vol. 2, Boulder, CO, USA: Lynne Rienner, pp. 391410.Google Scholar
Marks, G., Hooghe, L. Schakel, A. (2008), ‘Patterns of regional authority’, Regional and Federal Studies 18(2–3): 167181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, A. Dusa, A. (2011), ‘Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification’, Methodological Innovations Online 6(2): 103148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massetti, E. (2009), ‘Explaining regionalist party positioning in a multi-dimensional ideological space: a framework for analysis’, Regional and Federal Studies 19(4): 501531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadwell, H. Martin, P. (1996), ‘Economic integration and the politics of independence’, Nations and Nationalism 2(1): 6787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meguid, B. (2008), Party Competition between Unequals – Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. (2009), Devolution in the UK, Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, S. (1996), Ethnoregional Conflict in Democracies: Mostly Ballots, Rarely Bullets, Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Ragin, C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry, Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragin, C., Drass, K. Davey, S. (2006), Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0, Tucson, AZ, USA: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Rudolph, J. (1977), ‘Ethnic sub-states and the emergent politics of tri-level interaction in Western Europe’, Western Political Quarterly 30(4): 537557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheinman, L. (1977), ‘The interfaces of regionalism in Western Europe: Brussels and the Peripheries’, in M. Esman (ed.), Ethnic Conflict in the Western World, Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press, pp. 6578.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L.J. (1979), ‘Decentralist trends in Western democracies: a first appraisal’, in Idem (ed.), Decentralist Trends in Western Democracies, London: Sage, pp. 979.Google Scholar
Sorens, J. (2004), ‘Globalization, secessionism, and autonomy’, Electoral Studies 23(4): 727752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorens, J. (2009), ‘The partisan logic of decentralization in Europe’, Regional and Federal Studies 19(2): 255272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegarescu, D. (2004), Economic Integration and Fiscal Decentralization: Evidence from OECD Countries, Discussion paper No. 04-86, Mannheim: Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
Van Houten, P. (2003), ‘Globalization and demands for regional autonomy in Europe’, in M. Kahler and D. Lake (eds), Governance in a Global Economy, Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, pp. 110135.Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. (1976), ‘Constitutional devolution and functionalist community-building: inverse trends in European politics’, The Southern Quarterly 14(3): 215229.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Dardanelli Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Dardanelli Supplementary Material(File)
File 296 KB
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

European integration, party strategies, and state restructuring: a comparative analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

European integration, party strategies, and state restructuring: a comparative analysis
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

European integration, party strategies, and state restructuring: a comparative analysis
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *