Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Do corruption measures have a perception problem? Assessing the relationship between experiences and perceptions of corruption among citizens and experts

  • Nicholas Charron (a1)
Abstract

How well do corruption perception measures reflect actual levels of public sector corruption? Leading cross-national corruption perception measures have come under much theoretical and empirical scrutiny in recent years, with serious implications for the validity and reliability of the data in this ever growing sub-field. Critics argue that perceptions – in particular those of outside experts – do not reflect actual corruption in that they are far too ‘noisy’ or simply biased by external factors such as economic performance. Moreover, a number of recent empirical studies, focused on developing areas, have put forth evidence that outside expert assessments of corruption correspond little, if at all, with the experiences and views of actual citizens, and that such a lack of correspondence demonstrates pessimism for existing perception measures. This study offers a systematic analysis of the empirical strength of corruption perception measures in a previously unexplored area in this debate – Europe. Using new survey data collected by the author based on 85,000 European respondents in 24 countries, this issue is analyzed directly, addressing several contemporary critiques of the data. First, perceptions of citizens with, and without, personal corruption experience are compared at both the national and sub-national level in Europe. Second, external factors are checked, which might bias the extent to which citizens perceive corruption relative to how much actual corruption exists in countries and regions. Finally, expert perception indicators and citizen perceptions and experiences are compared. In summary, strong counter-evidence is found to the prevailing pessimistic claims in the literature – the consistency between actual reported corruption, as well as citizen and expert perceptions of corruption, is remarkably high and such perceptions are swayed little by ‘outside noise’. I conclude that, although existing corruption measures certainly have their share of problems, concerns regarding the validity and bias of perceptions have, perhaps, been overstated.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: nc.dbp@cbs.dk
References
Hide All
Abramo, C. (2008), ‘How much do perceptions of corruption really tell us?’, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 2: 3.
Andersson, S. and Heywood, P.M. (2009), ‘The politics of perception: use and abuse of Transparency International’s approach to measuring corruption’, Political Studies 57(4): 746767.
Apaza, C.R. (2009), ‘Measuring governance and corruption through the worldwide governance indicators: Critiques, responses, and ongoing scholarly discussion’, PS: Political Science & Politics 42(1): 139143.
Arndt, C. and Oman, C. (2006), Development Centre Studies Uses and Abuses of Governance Indicators , Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P. and Walsh, P. (2001), ‘New tools in comparative political economy: The Database of Political Institutions’, The World Bank Economic Review 15(1): 165176.
Boylan, Richard and Long, Cheryl (2003), Measuring public corruption in the American states: A survey of state house reporters, State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3(4): 420438.
Charron, N. and Lapuente, V. (2010), ‘Does democracy produce quality of government?’, European Journal of Political Research 49(4): 443470.
Charron, N., Dahlström, C. and Lapuente, V. (2012), ‘No law without a state’, Journal of Comparative Economics 40(2): 176193.
Charron, N., Lapuente, V. and Rothstein, B. (2013), Good Government and Corruption from a European Perspective: A Comparative Study on the Quality of Government in EU Regions, Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Charron, N., Dijkstra, L. and Lapuente, V. (2014a), Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions, Social Indicators Research, 132.
Charron, N., Dijkstra, L. and Lapuente, V. (2014b), ‘Regional governance matters: quality of government within European Union member states’, Regional Studies 48(1): 6890.
Chong, A. and Calderon, C. (2000), ‘Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth’, Economics & Politics 12(1): 6981.
Clarke, G.R. (2011), ‘How petty is petty corruption? Evidence from firm surveys in africa’, World Development 39(7): 11221132.
Donchev, D. and Ujhelyi, G. (2009), What do corruption indices measure? Retrieved from Social Science Research Network website: http://ssrn.com/paper=1124066
Gingerich, D.W. (2013), ‘Governance indicators and the level of analysis problem: empirical findings from South America’, British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 505540.
Heidenheimer, A.J., Johnston, M. and LeVine, V.T. (eds) (1989), Political Corruption: A Handbook, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Holmberg, S., Nasiritousi, N. and Rothstein, B. (2009), ‘Quality of government: what you get’, Annual Review of Political Science. 13(12): 135161.
Hopkin, J. and Rodriguez‐Pose, A. (2007), ‘“Grabbing Hand” or “Helping Hand”?: corruption and the economic role of the state’, Governance 20(2): 187208.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2007), ‘Growth and governance: A reply’, Journal of Politics 69(2): 555562.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M.(2010), The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 5430.
Knack, S.F. (2006), Measuring corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia: a critique of the cross-country indicators. Vol. 3968, World Bank-free PDF.
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1995), ‘Institutions and economic performance: cross‐country tests using alternative institutional measures’, Economics & Politics 7(3): 207227.
Ko, K. and Samajdar, A. (2010), ‘Evaluation of international corruption indexes: should we believe them or not?’, The Social Science Journal 47(3): 508540.
Kurtz, M.J. and Schrank, A. (2007), ‘Growth and governance: models, measures, and mechanisms’, Journal of politics 69(2): 538554.
Lambsdorff, J.G. (2007), The Institutional Economics of Corruption and Reform: Theo and Policy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Mauro, P. (1995), ‘Corruption and growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110(3): 681712.
Melgar, N., Rossi, M. and Smith, T.W. (2010), ‘The perception of corruption’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 22(1): 120131.
Morris, S.D. and Klesner, J.L. (2010), ‘Corruption and trust: theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico’, Comparative Political Studies 43(10): 12581285.
Olken, B.A. (2009), ‘Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality’, Journal of Public Economics 93(7): 950964.
Pollitt, C. (2011), ‘Moderation in all things: International Comparisons of Governance Quality’, Financial Accountability & Management 27(4): 437457.
Razafindrakoto, M. and Roubaud, F. (2010), ‘Are international databases on corruption reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa’, World Development 38(8): 10571069.
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999), Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, R. and Mishler, W. (2010), ‘Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case’, Global Crime 11(2): 145163.
Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R.W. (1993), ‘Corruption’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 108(3): 599617.
Seligson, M.A. (2006), ‘The measurement and impact of corruption victimization: survey evidence from Latin America’, World Development 34(2): 381404.
Snyder, R. (2001), ‘Scaling down: the subnational comparative method’, Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1): 93110.
Tanzi, V. (1998), ‘Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures’, Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund 45(4): 559594.
Teorell, J., Charron, N., Dahlberg, S., Holmberg, S., Rothstein, B., Sundin, P. and Svensson, R. (2013), The Quality of Government Dataset, version 20Dec13. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute. Retrieved April 2014 from http://www.qog.pol.gu.se
Thomas, M.A. (2009), ‘What do the worldwide governance indicators measure?’, European Journal of Development Research 22(1): 3154.
Uslaner, E. (2002), The moral foundations of trust, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Charron supplementary material
Appendix

 Word (69 KB)
69 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed