Skip to main content

Institutional determinants of deliberative interaction

  • Claudia Landwehr (a1) and Katharina Holzinger (a2)

A central assumption of deliberative theory is that political preferences are endogenous to decision-making processes in which they are transformed by communicative interaction. We identify discursiveness and coordination of interaction as central determinants of preference change and develop a typology of political modes of interaction that affect the likelihood of preference change differently. These properties are in turn influenced by institutional characteristics of the fora in which communicative interaction takes place. To illustrate our approach empirically we present a comparative analysis of two extreme modes of interaction, ‘debate’ and ‘deliberation’, providing a case study of a parliamentary debate and a citizen conference on the same conflict: the import of embryonic stem cells in Germany. We assess the discursiveness and coordination as well as the amount of preference transformation in both forums.

Corresponding author
* E-mail:
Hide All
Austin, J.L. (2002 [1962]), Zur Theorie der Sprechakte (How to Do Things with Words), Leipzig: Reclam.
Bächtiger, A. (2005), The Real World of Deliberation. A Comparative Study of its Favorable Conditions in Legislatures, Bern: Paul Haupt.
Bächtiger, A., Niemeyer, S., Neblo, M., Steenbergen, M.R., Steiner, J. (2010), ‘Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: competing theories, their empirical blind-spots, and complementarities’, Journal of Political Philosophy 18(1): 3263.
ben Salem, A.Tannert, C. (2004), ‘Planung und Organisation der Bürgerkonferenz’, in C. Tannert and P. Wiedemann (eds), Stammzellen im Diskurs, München: Oekom, pp. 106116.
Bessette, J.M. (1980), ‘Deliberative democracy: the majority principle in republican government’, in R.A.S. Goldwin and A. William (eds), How Democratic is the Constitution?, Washington: AEI, pp. 102116.
Bohman, J. (1996), Public Deliberation. Pluralism, Complexity, and Democracy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Bohman, J.Rehg, W. (1997), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Brandom, R.B. (1994), Making it Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Burow, O.-A.Kühnemuth, K. (2004), ‘Brauchen Wissenschaft und Politik Bürgerberatung? Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der Bürgerkonferenz’, in C. Tannert and P. Wiedemann (eds), Stammzellen im Diskurs, Müchen: Oekom, pp. 117129.
Chambers, S. (2004), ‘Behind closed doors: publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation’, The Journal of Political Philosophy 12(4): 389410.
Chambers, S. (2005), ‘Measuring publicity’s effect: reconciling empirical research and normative theory’, Acta Politica 40: 255266.
Cohen, L.J. (1989), ‘Belief and acceptance’, Mind xcviii(391): 367389.
della Porta, D. (2005), ‘Deliberation in movement: why and how to study deliberative democracy and social movements’, Acta Politica 40: 336350.
Dryzek, J. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford: OUP.
Elster, J. (1995), ‘Strategic uses of argument’, in K. Arrow (ed.), Barriers to Conflict Resolution, New York: W.W. Norton & Co, pp. 236257.
Elster, J. (1998), ‘Deliberation and constitution making’, in J. Elster (ed.), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97122.
Erdwien, B. (2004), ‘Bürgerpartizipation als Gruppenprozess: Ergebnisse der begleitenden Evaluation’, in C. Tannert and P. Wiedemann (eds), Stammzellen im Diskurs, München: Oekom, pp. 130137.
Fishkin, J. (1991), The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fishkin, J.S.Laslett, P. (eds) (2003), Debating Deliberative Democracy, Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Gastil, J.Levine, P. (eds) (2005), The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Goodin, R.E. (2003), Reflective Democracy, Oxford: OUP.
Goodin, R.E. (2005), ‘Sequencing deliberative moments’, Acta Politica 40: 182196.
Gutmann, A.Thompson, D. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
Habermas, J. (1984), The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1994), Faktizität und Geltung, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp (English translation: Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: MIT Press).
Habermas, J. (2000), ‘From Kant to Hegel: on Robert Brandom’s pragmatic philosophy of language’, European Journal of Philosophy 8(3): 322355.
Habermas, J. (2005), ‘Concluding comments on empirical approaches to deliberative politics’, Acta Politica 40: 384392.
Hansen, K.M. (2004), Deliberative Democracy and Opinion Formation, Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.
Harsanyi, J.C. (1955), ‘Cardinal welfare, individualistic ethics, and interpersonal comparisons of utility’, Journal of Political Economy 63(4): 309321.
Hendriks, C.M., Dryzek, J.S., Hunold, C. (2007), ‘Turning up the heat: partisanship in democratic innovation’, Political Studies 55(2): 362383.
Henning, H.J., Erdwien, B. (2004). Bürgerkonferenz zur Stammzellforschung 2003/2004, Abschlussbericht. Bremen, Universität Bremen, Institut für Psychologie: 1–94.
Holzinger, K. (2001), ‘Verhandeln statt Argumentieren oder Verhandeln durch Argumentieren? Eine empirische Analyse auf der Basis der Sprechakttheorie’, PVS 42(3): 414446.
Holzinger, K. (2004), ‘Bargaining through arguing: an empirical analysis based on speech act theory’, Political Communication 21: 195222.
Holzinger, K. (2005), ‘Context or conflict types: which determines the selection of communication mode’, Acta Politica 40(2): 239254.
Joss, S.Durant, J. (eds) (1995), Public Participation in Science. The Role of Consensus Conferences in Europe, London: Science Museum.
Landwehr, C. (2009), Political Conflict and Political Preferences. Communicative Interaction between Facts, Norms and Interests, Colchester: ECPR Press.
Macedo, S.E. (1999), Deliberative Politics. Essays on ‘Democracy and Disagreement’, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (2006), ‘Conflict and self-interest in deliberation’, in S. Besson and J.L. Martí (eds), Deliberative Democracy and its Discontents, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 107132.
March, J.G.Olsen, J.P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions. The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: The Free Press.
Mutz, D.C. (2008), ‘Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory?’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 521538.
Naurin, D. (2007), Deliberation behind Closed Doors, Colchester: ECPR Press.
Neblo, M.A. (2005), ‘Thinking through democracy: between the theory and practice of deliberative politics’, Acta Politica 40: 169181.
Niemeyer, S. (2002). Deliberation in the wilderness. Transforming policy preferences through discourse. Phd thesis. Australian National University.
Nullmeier, F. (2003), ‘Sprechakttheorie und Textanalyse’, in M.L. Maier, A. Hurrelmann, F. Nullmeier, T. Pritzlaff and A. Wiesner (eds), Politik als Lernprozess?, Opladen: Leske+Budrich, pp. 211223.
Richardson, H.S. (1994), Practical Reasoning about Final Ends, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Scharpf, F.W. (1997), Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research, Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
Schneiderhan, E.Khan, S. (2008), ‘Reasons and inclusion. The foundation of deliberation’, Sociological Theory 26: 124.
Searle, J.R. (1979), ‘A taxonomy of illocutionary acts’, in J.R. Searle (ed.), Expression and Meaning. Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139.
Steedman, I.Krause, U. (1986), ‘Goethe’s Faust and Arrow’s possibility theorem’, in J. Elster (ed.), The Multiple Self, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 179231.
Steenbergen, M.R., Bächtiger, A., Sporndli, M., Steiner, J.(2003), ‘Measuring political deliberation. A discourse quality index’, Comparative European Politics 1: 2148.
Steiner, J., Bächtiger, A., et al. (2005), Deliberative Politics in Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sunstein, C.R. (2003), ‘The law of group polarization’, in J.S. Fishkin and P. Laslett (eds), Debating Deliberative Democracy, Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, pp. 80101.
Tannert, C.Wiedemann, P. (eds) (2004), Stammzellen im Diskurs. Ein Lese- und Arbeitsbuch zu einer Bürgerkonferenz, München: Oekom.
Thompson, D.F. (2008), ‘Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497520.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 251 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.