Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Keeping party programmes on track: the transmission of the policy agendas of executive speeches to legislative outputs in the United Kingdom

  • Shaun Bevan (a1), Peter John (a1) and Will Jennings (a1)

In the United Kingdom, the transmission between policy promises and statutes is assumed to be both rapid and efficient because of the tradition of party discipline, relative stability of government, absence of coalitions, and the limited powers of legislative revision in the second chamber. Even in the United Kingdom, the transmission is not perfect since legislative priorities and outputs are susceptible to changes in public opinion or media coverage, unanticipated events in the external world, backbench rebellions, changes in the political parties, and the practical constraints of administering policies or programmes. This paper investigates the strength of the connection between executive priorities and legislative outputs measured by the Speech from the Throne and Acts of Parliament from 1911 to 2008. These are categorized according to the policy content coding system of the UK Policy Agendas Project ( Time series cross-sectional analyses show that there is transmission of the policy agenda from the speech to acts. However, the relationship differs by party, strengthening over time for Conservative governments and declining over time for Labour and other governments.

Corresponding author
* E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

B. Canes-Wrone (2001), ‘A theory of presidents’ public agenda setting’, Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(2): 183208.

J.E. Cohen (1997), Presidential Responsiveness and Public Policy-Making: The Publics and the Policies That Presidents Choose, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

J.E. Cohen (1995), ‘Presidential rhetoric and the public agenda’, American Journal of Political Science 39(1): 87107.

M. Laver (1999), ‘Divided parties, divided government’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 24: 529.

D. Marquand (1988), The Unprincipled Society: New Demands and Old Politics, London: Cape.

D. Mueller (1987), ‘The growth of government. A public choice perspective’, International Monetary Fund 34(1): 115149.

K. Strøm (2003), ‘Parliamentary democracy and delegation’, in K. Strøm, W. Müller and B. Torbjörn (eds), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55106.

S. Walgrave M. Nuytemans (2009), ‘Friction and party manifesto change in 25 countries’, American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 190206.

C. Wlezien (1995), ‘The public as thermostat: dynamics of preferences for spending’, American Journal of Political Science 39: 9811000.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.