Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Professionalism and organizational performance in the wake of new managerialism

  • Shirin Ahlbäck Öberg (a1) and Louise Bringselius (a2)
Abstract

With New Public Management came the idea that public organizations should be led by professional managers, rather than by professionals. This has been referred to as new managerialism. This article explores how new managerialism may affect professional autonomy in a public organization that enjoys a high – and constitutionally protected – degree of organizational autonomy. A framework distinguishing between organizational and occupational professionalism is adopted, in a 10-year case study of the Swedish National Audit Office (SNAO). The study shows how the autonomy of professionals at the SNAO was highly restricted, while management control systems were continuously expanded. At the same time, SNAO performance has been reduced. For example, the SNAO has been criticized for its high overhead costs. The study presented in this article, shows the complex interplay between professionalism, new managerialism, and organizational performance. Based on the findings from this study, the article maintains that it is equally important to consider how autonomy is distributed within agencies, as it is to consider how autonomy is distributed between the political sphere and the administration, when trying to explain organizational performance.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: shirin.ahlback@statsvet.uu.se
References
Hide All
Abma T.A. and Noordegraaf M. (2003), ‘Public managers amidst ambiguity: towards a typology of evaluative practices in public management’, Evaluation 9(3): 285306.
Ackroyd S., Kirkpatrick I. and Walker R.M. (2007), ‘Public management reform in the UK and its consequences for professional organization: a comparative analysis’, Public Administration 85: 926.
Agevall L. and Jonnergård K. (2007), ‘Management by documents: a risk of deprofessionalizing?’, in C. Aili, L.-E. Nilsson, L.G. Svensson and P. Denicolo (eds), Tension between Organization and Profession: Professionals in Nordic Public Service, Lund: Nordic Academic Press.
Ahlbäck S. (1999), Att kontrollera staten. Den statliga revisionens roll i den parlamentariska demokratin. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis [diss.], Uppsala, 131.
Ahlbäck S. (2001), ‘En konstitutionell revolution – den nya revisionsmyndigheten’, Politologen 30: 2532.
Aranya N. and Ferris K.R. (1983), ‘Organizational-professional conflict among U.S. and israeli professional accountants’, The Journal of Social Psychology 119(2): 153161.
Brante T. (1992), ‘Expert society: the origins and development of professions in Sweden’, Studies of Higher Education and Research 1992: 129.
Brante T. (1999), ‘Professional waves and state objectives: a macro-sociological model of the origin and development of continental professions, illustrated by the case of Sweden’, in I. Hellberg, M. Saks and C. Benoit (eds), Professional Identities in Transition, Göteborg: Department of Sociology, Göteborg University.
Bringselius L. (2008), Personnel Resistance in Public Professional Service Mergers: the Merging of Two National Audit Organizations, Lund Studies in Economics and Management [diss.] Lund: Lund Business Press.
Bringselius L. (2011), ‘Performance audit at the Swedish Supreme Audit Institution (SAI)’. The Lund Institute of Economic Research Report Series, no. 2011–01. Lund: Lund University.
Bringselius L. (2013), Organisera oberoende granskning: Riksrevisionens första tio år, Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Bringselius L. (2014), ‘The dissemination of results from supreme audit institutions: independent partners with the media?’, Financial Accountability & Management 30(1): 7594.
Broadbent J. and Laughlin R. (2001), ‘Public service professionals and the new public management: control of the professions in public services’, in K., McLaughlin, S., Osborne and E., Ferlie (eds), The New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects, London: Routledge.
Brodkin E.Z. (2011), ‘Policy work: street-level organizations under new managerialism’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(Supplement 2): i253i277.
Brunsson N. and Jacobsson B. (2000), A World of Standards, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burrage M. and Torstendahl R. (1990), Professions in Theory and History. Rethinking the Study of the Professions, London: Sage.
Choi S., Holmberg I., Löwstedt J. and Brommels M. (2011), ‘Executive management in radical change: the case of the Karolinska University Hospital merger’, Scandinavian Journal of Management 27: 1123.
Christensen T. and Lægreid P. (eds) (2006), Autonomy and Regulation: Coping with Agencies in the Modern State, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Clarke J. and Newman J. (1997), The Managerial State, London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Cowton C.J. and Brierley J.A. (2000), ‘Putting meta-analysis to work: accountants’ organizational-professional conflict’, Journal of Business Ethics 24(4 (part 2)): 343353.
Dagens Nyheter (2003), ‘Riksrevisionen är förlamad’, Dagens Nyheter, May 5, Stockholm.
Deem R. (2001), ‘Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: is the local dimension still important?’, Comparative Education 37(1): 720.
Deem R. and Brehony K.J. (2005), ‘Management as ideology: the case of “new managerialism” in higher education’, Oxford Review of Education 31: 217235.
Denhardt R.B. and Denhardt J.V. (2000), ‘The new public service: serving rather than steering’, Public Administration Review 60: 549559.
Diver C. (1982), ‘Engineers and entrepreneurs: the dilemma of public management’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 1(3): 402406.
Douglas P.P. (1971), ‘Professionalism: its presence and absence in the insurance industry’, Journal of Risk and Insurance 38(2): 215224.
Evetts J. (2003), ‘The sociological analysis of professionalism: occupational change in the modern world’, International Sociology 18(2): 395415.
Evetts J. (2006), ‘Introduction: trust and professionalism: challenges and occupational changes’, Current Sociology 54(4): 515531.
Evans T. (2011), ‘Professionals, managers and discretion: critiquing street-level bureaucracy’, British Journal of Social Work 41(2): 368386.
Evans T. and Harris J. (2004), ‘Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (exaggerated) death of discretion’, The British Journal of Social Work 34(6): 871895.
Exworthy M. and Halford S. (eds) (1999), Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ferlie E. and Geraghty K.J. (2007), ‘Professionals in public service organizations: implications for public sector “Reforming”’, in E., Ferlie, L.E., Lynn and C., Pollitt (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: OUP.
Flynn R. (1999), ‘Managerialism, professionalism and quasi-markets’, in M., Exworthy and S., Halford (eds), Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Freidson E. (1995), ‘What is “The” State; What is “The” Profession?’ Paper to the SASE conference, April 7–9, Washington.
Freidson E. (1999), ‘Theory of professionalism: method and substance’, International Review of Sociology 9(1): 117129.
Freidson E. (2001), Professionalism: The Third Logic, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gore A. (1993), From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less, Washington, DC: National Performance Review.
Grönlund A., Svärdsten F. and Öhman P. (2011), ‘Value for money and the rule of law: the (new) performance audit in Sweden’, International Journal of Public Sector Management 24(2): 107121.
Guest D.E. (1997), ‘Human resource management and performance: a review and research agenda’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 8(3): 263276.
Gunz H.P. and Gunz S.P. (1994), ‘Professional/Organizational commitment and job satisfaction for employed lawyers’, Human Relations 47(7): 801828.
Hall R.H. (1968), ‘Professionalization and bureaucratization’, American Sociological Review 33(1): 92104.
Hertting N., Jungerhem S. and Sjöblom A. (2012), Kvalitetsbedömning av Effektivitetsrevisionens Granskningsprocess, Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Hertting N., Jungerhem S., Murhem S., Sjöblom A., Stenbacka S. and Söderberg B. (2011), Kvalitetsbedömning av effektivitetsrevisionens granskningsrapporter, 2011: Rapport till Riksrevisionen, Uppsala: Uppsala universitet.
Hood C. and Peters G. (2004), ‘The middle aging of new public management: into the age of paradox?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14: 267282.
Ingraham P.W. (2005), ‘Performance: promises to keep and miles to go’, Public Administration Review 65(4): 390395.
INTOSAI. (2001), ‘Code of Ethics and Auditing Standards’, Issued by the Auditing Standards Committee at the XVIth Congress of INTOSAI in 1998 in Montevideo, INTOSAI, Uruguay.
INTOSAI (2004), ‘Implementation Guidelines for Performance Auditing – Standards and Guidelines for Performance Auditing based on INTOSAI’s Auditing Standards and Practical Experience’, presented by INTOSAI Auditing Standards Committee, INTOSAI, Stockholm.
Kirkpatrick I., Ackroyd S. and Walker R.M. (2005), The New Managerialism and Public Service Professions, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kitchener M. (2002), ‘Mobilizing the logic of managerialism in professional fields: the case of academic health center mergers’, Organization Studies 23: 391420.
Lindblom C. (1977), Politics and Markets: the World’s Political-Economic Systems, New York: Basic Books.
Maor M. (2004), ‘Feeling the heat? Anticorruption mechanisms in comparative perspective’, Governance 17: 128.
Meyer R.E. and Hammerschmid G. (2010), ‘The degree of decentralization and individual decision making in central government human resource management: a European comparative perspective’, Public Administration 88(2): 455478.
Miceli M.P. and Near J.P. (1988), ‘Individual and situational correlates of whistle-blowing’, Personnel Psychology 41: 267–281.
Newman S. and Lawler J. (2009), ‘Managing health care under new public management: a sisyphean challenge for nursing’, Journal of Sociology 45: 419432.
Noordegraaf M., de Wit B. (2012), ‘Responses to managerialism: how management pressures affect managerial relations and loyalties in education’, Public Administration 90: 957973.
O’Reilly D. and Reed M. (2011), ‘The grit in the oyster: professionalism, managerialism and leaderism as discourses of UK public services modernization’, Organization Studies 32: 10791101.
Parker M. (2002), Against Management: Organization in the Age of Managerialism, Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Pollitt C. (1990), ‘Doing business in the temple: managers and quality assurance in public services’, Public Administration 68(4): 435452.
Pollitt C. and Bouckaert G. (2011), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis: New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, Oxford: OUP.
Pollitt C. and Summa H. (1999), Performance or Compliance?: Performance Audit and Public Management in Five Countries, Oxford: OUP.
Powell W.W. (1991), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Reed M. (2002), ‘New managerialism, professional power and organizational governance in UK universities: a review and assessment’, in A. Amaral, G.A. Jones and B. Karseth (eds), Governing Higher Education: National Perspectives on Institutional Governance, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 163186.
SFS [Swedish Code of Statutes] 2002:1022, ‘the Swedish Act on Auditing of State Activities’.
Shafer W.E. (2002), ‘Ethical pressure, organizational-professional conflict, and related work outcomes among management accountants’, Journal of Business Ethics 38(3): 261273.
Sveriges riksdag (2008/09 URF1), ‘Uppföljning av Riksrevisionsreformen: Riksrevisionens styrelse, ledning och hanteringen av effektivitetsgranskningar’.
Sveriges riksdag (2008/09:URF3), ‘Uppföljning av Riksrevisionsreformen II: Effektivitetsrevisionen, den årliga revisionen och den internationella verksamheten’.
Sveriges riksdag (2009), ‘Vad ska Riksrevisionen granska?’, February 26, Appendix 2, 2008/09:URF3, pp. 129–169.
SVT [Swedish Public Service Television] Aktuellt [news program] (2011), March 13.
Teelken C. (2012), ‘Compliance or pragmatism: how do academics deal with managerialism in higher education? a comparative study in three countries’, Studies in Higher Education 37(3): 271290.
Terry L.S. (1998), ‘Administrative leadership, neo-managerialism, and the public management movement’, Public Administration Review 58(3): 194200.
Thomas R. and Dunkerley D. (1999), ‘Careering Downwards? Middle Managers’ Experiences in the Downsized Organization’, British Journal of Management 10: 157169.
Thorelli H.B. (1986), ‘Networks: between markets and hierarchies’, Strategic Management Journal 7: 3751.
Tummers L.G. and Knies E. (2013), ‘Leadership and meaningful work in the public sector’, Public Administration Review 73: 859868.
Van Thiel S., Verhoest K., Bouckaert G. and Lægreid P. (2012), ‘Lessons and recommendations for the practice of agencification’, in K. Verhoest, S. Van Thiel, G. Bouckaert and P. Lægreid (eds), Government Agencies: Practices and Lessons from 30 Countries, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 413440.
Verhoest K., Peters B.G., Bouckaert G. and Vershuere B. (2004), ‘The study of organisational autonomy: a conceptual review’, Public Administration and Development 24: 101118.
Wilensky H.L. (1964), ‘The professionalization of everyone?’, American Journal of Sociology 70(2): 137158.
Williamson O.E. (1973), ‘Markets and hierarchies: some elementary considerations’, American Economic Review 63(2): 316325.
Kuriren. (2006), No. 8.
Sifo Research and Consulting. (2004), ‘Riksrevisionen – Attitydmätning 2004’. Projektnummer 1512017, 2004-09-07.
Sifo Research and Consulting. (2005), ‘Riksrevisionen – Medarbetarundersökning 2005’. Projektnummer 1514099, 2006-01-07.
SNAO Board. (2006), ‘Riksrevisionens styrelse och effektivitetsrevisionen – en uppföljning efter tre år’.
ZonderaCom. (2008), ‘Resultatrapport Riksrevisionen’.
ZonderaCom. (2010), ‘Resultatrapport Riksrevisionen’.
Gullers Grupp. (2007), Omvärldens syn på Riksrevisionen: en intervjuundersökning med 23 viktiga intressenter. January 2007.
#28 (Jun 11, 2003), Performance auditor at the Parliamentary Auditors.
#39 (Oct 8, 2003), Performance auditor at the SNAO, formerly at the Parliamentary Auditors.
#40 (Oct 8, 2003), Member of the SNAO reform preparations group.
#65 (Sep 27, 2004), Performance auditor at the SNAO, formerly RRV.
#76 (Oct 13, 2006), Performance auditor at the SNAO, formerly RRV; also a union representative.
#85 (Apr 20, 2007), Auditor-General at the SNAO.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 9
Total number of PDF views: 258 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 986 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.