Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Social democratic parties and antitrust policy: evidence from Western Europe (2002–13)

  • Mattia Guidi (a1) and Yannis Karagiannis (a2)
Abstract

This paper investigates the position of social democratic parties (SDPs) towards antitrust (competition) policy. Given their traditional state-interventionist attitude and their ties with organized labour, SDPs have long been considered as not supportive of antitrust policy. However, antitrust policy’s goal of granting consumers lower prices is beneficial to salary earners. Hence, it is not surprising that SDPs’ support for antitrust policy varies considerably. To account for such variation, this paper hypothesizes that SDPs’ support for antitrust policy depends on: (a) the influence of trade unions; (b) the electoral system; and (c) the degree of coordination of the economy. Analysing in depth 16 party manifestos of West European SDPs from 2002 to 2013, we check the plausibility of our hypotheses with seven paired comparisons. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that the influence of trade unions affects SDPs’ support for antitrust policy, while the impact of electoral system and economic coordination appears less evident.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: guidim@luiss.it
References
Hide All
Amato, G. (1997), Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Berman, E. (2006), The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bittlingmayer, G. (1992), ‘Stock returns, real activity, and the trust question’, Journal of Finance 47(5): 17011730.
Black, S. and Strahan, P. (2001), ‘The division of spoils: rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry’, American Economic Review 91(4): 814831.
Boix, C. (1998), Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. (2001), Regulation Theory: The State of the Art, London: Routledge.
Brown, C. and Medoff, J. (1989), ‘The Employer Size-Wage Effect’, The Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 10271059.
Buch-Hansen, H. and Wigger, A. (2011), The Politics of European Competition Regulation: A Critical Political Economy Perspective, London: Routledge.
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Delwit, P. (2004), Où va la social-démocratie européenne? Débats, enjeux, perspectives, Brussels: Université de Bruxelles.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985), Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road To Power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gerber, D. J. (1998), Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, Oxford/New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.
Giddens, A. (1999), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilardi, F. (2008), Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Guardiancich, I. and Guidi, M. (2015), ‘The formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: a case of institutional complementarity?’, Regulation & Governance, doi:10.1111/rego.12080.
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hall, P. and Gingerich, D. (2009), ‘Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: an empirical analysis’, British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 449482.
Karier, T. (1985), ‘Unions and monopoly profits’, Review of Economics and Statistics 67(1): 3442.
Kay, J. (2012), ‘The mechanics of markets: politics, economics, and finance’, in O. Cramme and P. Diamond (eds), After the Third Way, Cambridge, UK: Polity, 6174.
Kenworthy, L. (2014), Social Democratic America, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
King, G., Keohane, R. and Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. D. (2007), Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
McChesney, F. and Shughart, W. (eds) (1996), The Causes and Consequences of Antitrust: The Public-Choice Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, T. (2007), The Theory of Social Democracy, Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity.
Moe, T. M. (1990), ‘Political institutions: the neglected side of the story’, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 213253.
Monti, M. (2001), ‘Market definition as a cornerstone of EU Competition Policy’. Speech given at the Workshop on Market Definition – Helsinki Fair Centre, Helsinki (Finland), 5 October. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-01-439_en.htm?locale=en
Powell, M. (2004), ‘Social democracy in Europe: renewal or retreat?’, in G. Bonoli and M. Powell (eds), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 120.
Przeworksi, A. (1985), Capitalism and Social Democracy, New York, NY/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
Sassoon, D. (ed.) (1997), Looking Left: European Socialism After the Cold War, London (UK): I.B. Taurus.
Sejersted, F. (2011), The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Thatcher, M. (2005), ‘The third force? Independent regulatory agencies and elected politicians in Europe’, Governance 18(3): 347373.
Thomson, S. (2000), The Social Democratic Dilemma, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van Miert, K. (2001), Le marché et le pouvoir, Brussels: Racine.
Visser, J. (2011), ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies. Retrieved 30 May 2014 from http://www.uva-aias.net/208
Volkens, A. (2004), ‘Policy changes of European Social Democrats, 1945–98’, in G. Bonoli and M. Powell (eds), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe, London/New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 2142.
Weiss, L. (1966), ‘Concentration and labor earnings’, American Economic Review 56(1): 96117.
Wigger, A. and Nölke, A. (2007), ‘Enhanced roles of private actors in EU business regulation and the erosion of rhenish capitalism: the case of antitrust enforcement’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 45(2): 487513.
Wilks, S. (1999), In the Public Interest: Competition Policy and the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Wolinetz, S. B. (1993), ‘Reconstructing Dutch social democracy’, West European Politics 16(1): 97111.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed