Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T18:06:05.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social democratic parties and antitrust policy: evidence from Western Europe (2002–13)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 May 2015

Mattia Guidi  and
Yannis Karagiannis
Mattia Guidi*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Sciences, School of Government, LUISS Guido Carli, Rome
Yannis Karagiannis
Affiliation:
Institut Barcelona d’Estudis Internacionals, Barcelona
*
*E-mail: guidim@luiss.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the position of social democratic parties (SDPs) towards antitrust (competition) policy. Given their traditional state-interventionist attitude and their ties with organized labour, SDPs have long been considered as not supportive of antitrust policy. However, antitrust policy’s goal of granting consumers lower prices is beneficial to salary earners. Hence, it is not surprising that SDPs’ support for antitrust policy varies considerably. To account for such variation, this paper hypothesizes that SDPs’ support for antitrust policy depends on: (a) the influence of trade unions; (b) the electoral system; and (c) the degree of coordination of the economy. Analysing in depth 16 party manifestos of West European SDPs from 2002 to 2013, we check the plausibility of our hypotheses with seven paired comparisons. Our analysis supports the hypothesis that the influence of trade unions affects SDPs’ support for antitrust policy, while the impact of electoral system and economic coordination appears less evident.

Keywords

antitrustcompetitionparty manifestossocial democracytrade unions
Type
Research Article
Information
European Political Science Review , Volume 8 , Issue 4 , November 2016 , pp. 495 - 515
Copyright
© European Consortium for Political Research 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amato, G. (1997), Antitrust and the Bounds of Power: The Dilemma of Liberal Democracy in the History of the Market, Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Berman, E. (2006), The Primacy of Politics: Social Democracy and the Making of Europe’s Twentieth Century, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bittlingmayer, G. (1992), ‘Stock returns, real activity, and the trust question’, Journal of Finance 47(5): 1701–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, S. and Strahan, P. (2001), ‘The division of spoils: rent-sharing and discrimination in a regulated industry’, American Economic Review 91(4): 814–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, C. (1998), Political Parties, Growth and Equality: Conservative and Social Democratic Economic Strategies in the World Economy, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, R. and Saillard, Y. (2001), Regulation Theory: The State of the Art, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, C. and Medoff, J. (1989), ‘The Employer Size-Wage Effect’, The Journal of Political Economy 97(5): 1027–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buch-Hansen, H. and Wigger, A. (2011), The Politics of European Competition Regulation: A Critical Political Economy Perspective, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments, 1945–1998, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delwit, P. (2004), Où va la social-démocratie européenne? Débats, enjeux, perspectives, Brussels: Université de Bruxelles.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, G. (1985), Politics Against Markets: The Social Democratic Road To Power, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. J. (1998), Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe: Protecting Prometheus, Oxford/New York, NY: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1999), The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Gilardi, F. (2008), Delegation in the Regulatory State: Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe, Cheltenham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guardiancich, I. and Guidi, M. (2015), ‘The formal independence of regulatory agencies and Varieties of Capitalism: a case of institutional complementarity?’, Regulation & Governance, doi:10.1111/rego.12080.Google Scholar
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. and Gingerich, D. (2009), ‘Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: an empirical analysis’, British Journal of Political Science 39(3): 449–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karier, T. (1985), ‘Unions and monopoly profits’, Review of Economics and Statistics 67(1): 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, J. (2012), ‘The mechanics of markets: politics, economics, and finance’, in O. Cramme and P. Diamond (eds), After the Third Way, Cambridge, UK: Polity, 61–74.Google Scholar
Kenworthy, L. (2014), Social Democratic America, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
King, G., Keohane, R. and Verba, S. (1994), Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. D. (2007), Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003, Oxford/New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McChesney, F. and Shughart, W. (eds) (1996), The Causes and Consequences of Antitrust: The Public-Choice Perspective, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meyer, T. (2007), The Theory of Social Democracy, Cambridge, UK/Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Moe, T. M. (1990), ‘Political institutions: the neglected side of the story’, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 6: 213–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monti, M. (2001), ‘Market definition as a cornerstone of EU Competition Policy’. Speech given at the Workshop on Market Definition – Helsinki Fair Centre, Helsinki (Finland), 5 October. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-01-439_en.htm?locale=en Google Scholar
Powell, M. (2004), ‘Social democracy in Europe: renewal or retreat?’, in G. Bonoli and M. Powell (eds), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe, London: Routledge, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
Przeworksi, A. (1985), Capitalism and Social Democracy, New York, NY/Paris: Cambridge University Press/Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassoon, D. (ed.) (1997), Looking Left: European Socialism After the Cold War, London (UK): I.B. Taurus.Google Scholar
Sejersted, F. (2011), The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thatcher, M. (2005), ‘The third force? Independent regulatory agencies and elected politicians in Europe’, Governance 18(3): 347–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, S. (2000), The Social Democratic Dilemma, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Miert, K. (2001), Le marché et le pouvoir, Brussels: Racine.Google Scholar
Visser, J. (2011), ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts in 34 countries between 1960 and 2007. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies. Retrieved 30 May 2014 from http://www.uva-aias.net/208 Google Scholar
Volkens, A. (2004), ‘Policy changes of European Social Democrats, 1945–98’, in G. Bonoli and M. Powell (eds), Social Democratic Party Policies in Contemporary Europe, London/New York, NY: Routledge, pp. 21–42.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. (1966), ‘Concentration and labor earnings’, American Economic Review 56(1): 96–117.Google Scholar
Wigger, A. and Nölke, A. (2007), ‘Enhanced roles of private actors in EU business regulation and the erosion of rhenish capitalism: the case of antitrust enforcement’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 45(2): 487–513.Google Scholar
Wilks, S. (1999), In the Public Interest: Competition Policy and the Monopolies and Mergers Commission, Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Wolinetz, S. B. (1993), ‘Reconstructing Dutch social democracy’, West European Politics 16(1): 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar