Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Taking ideas and discourse seriously: explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’

  • Vivien A. Schmidt (a1)

All three of the traditionally recognized new institutionalisms – rational choice, historical, and sociological – have increasingly sought to ‘endogenize’ change, which has often meant a turn to ideas and discourse. This article shows that the approaches of scholars coming out of each of these three institutionalist traditions who take ideas and discourse seriously can best be classified as part of a fourth ‘new institutionalism’ – discursive institutionalism (DI) – which is concerned with both the substantive content of ideas and the interactive processes of discourse in institutional context. It argues that this newest of the ‘new institutionalisms’ has the greatest potential for providing insights into the dynamics of institutional change by explaining the actual preferences, strategies, and normative orientations of actors. The article identifies the wide range of approaches that fit this analytic framework, illustrating the ways in which scholars of DI have gone beyond the limits of the traditional institutionalisms on questions of interests and uncertainty, critical junctures and incremental change, norms and culture. It defines institutions dynamically – in contrast to the older neo-institutionalisms’ more static external rule-following structures of incentives, path-dependencies, and cultural framing – as structures and constructs of meaning internal to agents whose ‘background ideational abilities’ enable them to create (and maintain) institutions while their ‘foreground discursive abilities’ enable them to communicate critically about them, to change (or maintain) them. But the article also points to areas for improvement in DI, including the theoretical analysis of processes of ideational change, the use of the older neo-institutionalisms for background information, and the incorporation of the power of interests and position into accounts of the power of ideas and discourse.

Corresponding author
* E-mail:
Hide All
Aminzade, R.R., Goldstone, J.A., McAdam, D., Perry, E.J., Sewell, W.H. Jr., Tarry, S. Tilly, C. (2001), Silence and Voice in the Study of Contentious Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Art, D. (2006), The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baccaro, L., Papadakis, K. (2008), ‘The downside of participatory-deliberative public administration’. Paper presented at the Center for European Studies, Harvard University, Nov. 14, Cambridge, MA.
Bensel, R. (2005), ‘A cross of gold, a crown of thorns’, in I. Katznelson and B.R. Weingast (eds), Preferences and Situations: Points of Intersection between Historical and Rational Choice Institutionalism, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, pp. 27–61.
Berman, S. (1998), The Social Democratic Moment, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Blyth, M. (2002), Great Transformations, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Blyth, M. (2003), ‘Structures do not come with an instruction sheet: interests, ideas, and progress in political science’, Perspectives on Politics 1(4): 695706.
Blyth, M. (2010), ‘Four (plus two) reasons to take ideas very seriously indeed’, in D. Beland and R. Cox (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Scientific Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press (in press).
Bohman, J. (1996), Public Deliberation – Pluralism, Complexity and Democracy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1990), In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Campbell, J.L. (2004), Institutional Change and Globalization, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Campbell, J.L. Pedersen, O. (2001), ‘Introduction’, in J.L. Campbell and O. Pedersen (eds), The Rise of NeoLiberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 1–24.
Carstensen, M.B. (n/a), ‘Ideas are not as stable as political scientists want them to be: using discourse theory in ideational analysis’, manuscript submitted for peer review.
Cerny, P. (1994), ‘The dynamics of financial globalization’, Policy Sciences 27(4): 319342.
Checkel, J. (1998), ‘The constructivist turn in international relations theory’, World Politics 50(2): 324348.
Collier, D. Collier, R. (1991), Shaping the Political Arena, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Crouch, C. (2005), Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Culpepper, P.D. (2005), ‘Institutional change in contemporary capitalism: coordinated financial systems since 1990’, World Politics 57(2): 173199.
DiMaggio, P.J. Powell, W.W. (eds) (1991), ‘Introduction’, in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–40.
Druckman, J.N. (2004), ‘Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 671686.
Druckman, J.N. Lupia, A. (2006), ‘Mind, will, and choice’, in R.E. Goodin and C. Tilly (eds), Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 97–113.
Dryzek, J. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Elster, J. (ed.) (1998), Deliberative Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, C. (2008), The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
Finnemore, M. (1996), ‘Norms, culture, and world politics: insights from sociology’s institutionalism’, International Organization 50(2): 325347.
Fischer, F. (2003), Reframing Public Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fligstein, N. Mara-Drita, I. (1996), ‘How to make a market: reflections on the attempt to create a single market in the European Union’, American Journal of Sociology 102(1): 132.
Fung, A. Wright, E.O. (2003), ‘Countervailing power in empowered participatory governance’, in A. Fung and E.O. Wright (eds), Deepening Democracy, New York: Verso, pp. 259–290.
Gofas, A. Hay, C. (eds) (2010), ‘The ideas debate in political analysis: towards a cartography and critical assessment’, in The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis, London: Routledge (in press).
Goldstein, J. (1993), Ideas, Interests, and American Trade Policy, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Goldstein, J. Keohane, R. (1993), Ideas and Foreign Policy, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Goodin, R.E. Dryzek, J.S. (2006), ‘Deliberative impacts of mini-publics’, Politics and Society 32(2): 219244.
Goodin, R.E. Tilly, C. (eds) (2006), Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Green, D. Shapiro, I. (1994), The Pathologies of Rational Choice, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Grief, A. Laitin, D.D. (2004), ‘A theory of endogenous institutional change’, American Political Science Review 98(4): 633652.
Haas, P.M. (1992), ‘Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination’, International Organization 46(1): 135.
Habermas, J. (1996), Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory, London: Polity Press.
Hajer, M. (2003), ‘A frame in the fields: policymaking and the reinvention of politics’, in M. Hajer and H. Wagenaar (eds), Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 88112.
Hall, P. (1986), Governing the Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Hall, P. (ed.) (1989), ‘Conclusion’, in The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 369–392.
Hall, P. (1993), ‘Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: the case of economic policy-making in Britain’, Comparative Politics 25(3): 275296.
Hall, P. Soskice, D. (eds) (2001), ‘Introduction’, in Varieties of Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–68.
Hall, P. Taylor, R. (1996), ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44(5): 952973.
Hardin, R. (1982), Collective Action, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins.
Harmon-Jones, E. Mills, J. (1999), Cognitive Dissonance: Progress on a Pivotal Theory in Social Psychology, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Hay, C. (2001), ‘The ‘crisis’ of Keynesianism and the rise of neoliberalism in Britain: an ideational institutionalist approach’, in J.L. Campbell and O. Pedersen (eds), The Rise of NeoLiberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 193–218.
Hay, C. (2006), ‘Constructivist institutionalism’, in R.A.W. Rhodes, S. Binder and B. Rockman (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 56–74.
Holzinger, K. (2004), ‘Bargaining through arguing: an empirical analysis based on speech act theory’, Political Communication 21(2): 195222.
Howarth, D., Norval, A.J. Stavrakakis, Y. (eds) (2000), Discourse Theory and Political Analysis, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Iversen, T. Soskice, D. (2006), ‘Electoral institutions and the politics of coalitions: why some democracies redistribute more than others’, American Political Science Review 100(2): 165181.
Jobert, B. (1989), ‘The normative frameworks of public policy’, Political Studies 37: 376386.
Kahneman, D. (2000), ‘Preface’, in D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (eds), Choice, Values, and Frames, New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. ix–xvii.
Katzenstein, P.J. (1985), Small States in World Markets, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Katzenstein, P.J. (ed.) (1996), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.
Katznelson, I. Weingast, B. (eds) (2005), ‘Intersections between historical and rational choice institutionalism’, in Preferences and Situations, New York: Russel Sage, pp. 126.
Keck, M.E. Sikkink, K. (1998), Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Kinderman, D. (2005), ‘Pressure from without, subversion from within: the two-pronged German employer offensive’, Comparative European Politics 3(4): 432463.
King, D. (1999), In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kingdon, J. (1984), Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, New York: Longman.
Kjaer, P. Pedersen, O. (2001), ‘Translating liberalization: neoliberalism in the Danish negotiated economy’, in J.L. Campbell and O.K. Pedersen (eds), The Rise of Neoliberalism and Institutional Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 219–248.
Levi, M. (2006), ‘Why we need a new theory of government’, Perspectives on Politics 4(1): 520.
Lieberman, R.C. (2005), Shaping Race Policy: The United States in Comparative Perspective, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lukes, S. (2005), Power, Second Edition: A Radical View, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lupia, A. McCubbins, D.M. (1998), The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mahoney, J. (2000), ‘Path dependence in historical sociology’, Theory and Society 29(4): 507548.
Mansbridge, J. (1983), Beyond Adversary Democracy, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Mansbridge, J. (ed.) (1990), Beyond Self-Interest, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
March, J.G. Olsen, J.P. (1989), Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York: Free Press.
Mehta, J. (2010), ‘From “whether” to “how”: the varied role of ideas in politics’, in D. Beland and R. Cox (eds), Ideas and Politics in Social Scientific Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press (in press).
Muller, P. (1995), ‘Les politiques publiques comme construction d’un rapport au monde’, in A. Faure, G. Pollet and P. Warin (eds), La Construction du Sens dans les Politiques Publiques: Débats autour de la notion de Référentiel, Paris: L’Harmattan.
Mutz, D.C., Sniderman, P.M. Brody, R.A. (1996), Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
North, D.C. (1990), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Palier, B. (2005), ‘Ambiguous agreement, cumulative change: French social policy in the 1990s’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 127–144.
Petit, P. (2006), ‘Why and how philosophy matter to politics’, in R.E. Goodin and C. Tilly (eds), Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Studies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 35–57.
Pierson, P. (2000), ‘Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics’, American Political Science Review 94(2): 251268.
Rein, M. Schön, D.A. (1991), ‘Frame-reflective policy discourse’, in P. Wagner et al. (eds), Social Sciences, Modern States, National Experiences, and Theoretical Crossroads, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 262–289.
Risse, T. (2001), ‘Who are we? A Europeanization of national identities?’, in M.G. Cowles, J. Caporaso and T. Risse (eds), Transforming Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 198–216.
Roe, E. (1994), Narrative Policy Analysis: Theory and Practice, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rothstein, B. (2005), Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruggie, J. (1998), ‘What makes the world hang together? Neo-utilitarianism and the social constructivist challenge’, International Organization 52(4): 855885.
Quack, S. Djelic, M.-L. (2005), ‘Adaptation, recombination, and reinforcement: the story of antitrust and competition law in Germany and Europe’, in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds), Beyond Continuity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–281.
Sabatier, P. Jenkins-Smith, H.C. (eds) (1993), Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach, Boulder, CO: Westview.
Scharpf, F.W. (1997), Games Real Actors Play, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schmidt, V.A. (1997), ‘European integration and democracy: the differences among member states’, Journal of European Public Policy 4(1): 128145.
Schmidt, V.A. (2000), ‘Values and discourse in the politics of adjustment’, in F.W. Scharpf and V.A. Schmidt (eds), Welfare and Work in the Open Economy Volume I: From Vulnerability to Competitiveness, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–309.
Schmidt, V.A. (2002), The Futures of European Capitalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V.A. (2006), Democracy in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmidt, V.A. (2008), ‘Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science 11: 303326.
Schmidt, V.A. (2009a), ‘Comparative institutional analysis’, in T. Landman and N. Robinson (eds), Handbook of Comparative Politics, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Schmidt, V.A. (2009b), ‘Putting the political back into political economy by bringing the state back yet again’, World Politics 61(3): 516548.
Scott, W.R. (1995), Institutions and Organizations, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Searle, J. (1995), The Construction of Social Reality, New York: Free Press.
Shapiro, I. (1999), ‘Enough about deliberation: politics is about interests and power’, in S. Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 28–38.
Shapiro, I. (2003), The State of Democratic Theory, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shepsle, K.A. (1985), ‘Prospects for formal models of legislatures’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 10(1): 519.
Skogstad, G. Schmidt, V.A. (n/a), ‘Introduction: internationalization and policy paradigms’, in G. Skogstad (ed.), Internationalization and Policy Paradigm Change (Unpublished mss).
Steinmo, S., Lewis, O. (n/a), ‘Taking evolution seriously’. Unpublished Mss.
Steinmo, S., Thelen, K. Longstreth, F. (eds) (1992), Structuring Politics Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, W. Thelen, K. (eds) (2005), Beyond Continuity, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taleb, N.N., Pilpel, A. (2005), ‘On the very unfortunate problem of the nonobservability of the probability distribution’. Retrieved 8 November 2008 from
Thelen, K. (1999), ‘Historical institutionalism in comparative politics’ in The Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 2, pp. 369–404, Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.
Thelen, K. (2004), How Institutions Evolve: The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weingast, B. (1995), ‘A rational choice perspective on the role of ideas: shared belief systems, state sovereignty, and international cooperation’, Politics and Society 23(4): 449464.
Weir, M. (2006), ‘Labor identities and coalition building in the United States’. Paper prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30–September 2, Philadelphia.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972), On Certainty, New York: Harper.
Wendt, A. (1987), ‘The agent-structure problem in international relations theory’, International Organization 41(3): 335370.
Woll, C. (2008), Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Yee, A.S. (1996), ‘The causal effects of ideas on policies’, International Organization 50(1): 69108.
Yee, A.S. (1997), ‘Thick rationality and the missing ‘brute fact:’ the limits of rationalist incorporation of norms and ideas’, Journal of Politics 59(4): 10011039.
Young, I. (1996), ‘Communication and the other: beyond deliberative democracy’, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 125143.
Zaller, J. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed