Althaus, S.L. (1998), ‘Information effects in collective preferences’, American Political Science Review
Grimes, M. (Forthcoming), ‘Indignation or resignation: the implications of transparency for societal accountability’, Governance. First published online March 17; 2013. doi: 10.1111/gove.12033.
Bentham, J., James, M., Blamires, C.
Watkin, C.P. (1999), Political Tactics. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Oxford, Oxfordshire: Clarendon Press.
Bobbitt, P. (1978), Tragic Choices, New York: Norton & Company.
Coglianese, C. (2009), ‘The transparency president? The Obama administration and open government’, Governance
Converse, P.E. (1964), ‘The nature of belief systems in mass public’, in D.E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press, pp. 206–261.
Cook, F.L., Jacobs, L.R.
Kim, D. (2010), ‘Trusting what you know: information, knowledge, and confidence in social security’, The Journal of Politics
Meijer, A.J. (2006), ‘Does transparency strengthen legitimacy?’, Information Polity
Sabin, J.E. (2008), Setting Limits Fairly: Learning to Share Resources for Health, New York: Oxford University Press.
de Fine Licht, J. (2011), ‘Do we really want to know? The potentially negative effect of transparency in decision making on perceived legitimacy’, Scandinavian Political Studies
de Fine Licht, J., Naurin, D., Esaiasson, P.
Gilljam, M. (Forthcoming), ‘When does transparency generate legitimacy? experimenting on a context-bound relationship’, Governance. First published online December 30, 2012. doi:10.1111/gove.12021.
Wolak, J. (2012), ‘When do the ends justify the means? Evaluating procedural fairness’, Political Behavior
Esaiasson, P. (2010), ‘Will citizens take no for an answer? What government officials can do to enhance decision acceptance’, European Political Science Review
Esaiasson, P., Gilljam, M., Lindholm, T., Persson, M. (2013), ‘Deciding the fair way or having it my way? A new look at procedural fairness theory in the domain of policy’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, 11–14 April 2013, Chicago.
Grimes, M. (2005), Democracy's Infrastructure: The Role of Procedural Fairness in Fostering Consent, Gothenburg: Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg.
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2009), ‘Do transparent government agencies strengthen trust?’, Information Polity
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2010), ‘Transparency of public decision-making: towards trust in local government?’, Policy & Internet
Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2012), Transparency & Trust: An Experimental Study of Online Disclosure and Trust in Government, Utrecht: Utrecht School of Governance, Utrecht University.
Meijer, A.J. (Forthcoming), ‘The effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: evidence from an online experiment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. First published online November 5, 2012. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mus048.
Thompson, D.F. (1996), Democracy and Disagreement: Why Moral Conflict Cannot Be Avoided in Politics, and What Should Be Done About It, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press.
Heald, D. (2006), ‘Transparency as an instrumental value’, in C. Hood and D. Heald (eds), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 59–73.
Theiss-Morse, E. (2002), Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about How Government Should Work, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hood, C. (2006), ‘Transparency in historical perspective’, in C. Hood and D. Heald (eds), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–23.
Klosko, G. (2000), Democratic Procedures and Liberal Consensus, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quirk, P.J. (2000), ‘Reconsidering the Rational Public: Cognition, Heuristics, and Mass Opinion’, in A. Lupia, M.D. McCubbins and S.L. Popkin (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–182.
Leung, K., Tong, K.-K.
Lind, E.A. (2007), ‘Realpolitik versus fair process: moderating effects of group identification on acceptance of political decisions’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Tyler, T.R. (1988), The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, New York: Plenum.
Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M.R.
Brau, S. (1995), ‘The responsive voter: campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation’, American Political Science Review
Lupia, A., McCubbins, M.
Popkin, S. (2000), ‘Beyond rationality: reason and the study of politics’, in A. Lupia, M.D. McCubbins, and S.L. Popkin (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–20.
Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S.
Jowell, R. (2002), ‘Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science
MacCoun, R.J. (2006), ‘Psychological constraints on transparency in legal and government decision making’, Swiss Political Science Review
Mansbridge, J. (2009), ‘A “Selection Model” of political representation’, Journal of Political Philosophy
Martinsson, J., Lindgren, E., Pettersson, L.
Åsbrink, R. (2013), Citizen Panel IV, 2012. Technical Report, Gothenburg: Laboratory of Opinion Research, University of Gothenburg.
McGuire, W.J. (1969), ‘The nature of attitudes and attitude change’, in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (eds), Handbook of Social Psychology, 2nd edn., Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, pp. 136–314.
Meijer, A., Curtin, D.
Hillebrandt, A. (2012), ‘Open government: connecting vision and voice’, International Review of Administrative Sciences
Tyler, T.R. (2008), ‘Does moral conviction really override concerns about procedural justice? A reexamination of the value protection model’, Social Justice Research
O'Neill, O. (2006), ‘Transparency and the ethics of communication’, in C. Hood and D. Heald (eds), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 75–90.
Shapiro, R.Y. (1992), The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Popkin, S.L. (1991), The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dimock, M.A. (2000), ‘Knowledge, trust, and international reasoning’, in A. Lupia, M.D. McCubbins and S.L. Popkin (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 214–238.
Sabharwal, M. (2009), ‘Perceptions of transparency of government policymaking: a cross-national study’, Government Information Quarterly
Roberts, Al. (2006), ‘Dashed expectations: governmental adaptation to transparency rules’, in C. Hood and D. Heald (eds), Transparency: The Key to Better Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 107–125.
Skitka, L.J. (2002), ‘Do the means always justify the ends, or do the ends sometimes justify the means? A value protection model of justice reasoning’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A.
Tetlock, P.E. (1993), Reasoning and Choice: Explorations in Political Psychology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Syrett, K. (2007), Law, Legitimacy and the Rationing of Healthcare: A Contextual and Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tetlock, P.E. (2000), ‘Coping with trade-offs: psychological constraints and political implications’, in A. Lupia, M.D McCubbins and S.L. Popkin (eds), Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239–263.
Walker, L. (1975), Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Mossberger, K. (2006), ‘The effects of e-government on trust and confidence in government’, Public Administration Review
Kahneman, D. (1974), ‘Judgment under uncertainty-heuristics and biases’, Science
Tyler, T.R. (1997), ‘The psychology of legitimacy: a relational perspective on voluntary deference to authorities’, Personality & Social Psychology Review
Tyler, T.R. (2000), ‘Social justice: outcome and procedure’, International Journal of Psychology
Tyler, T.R. (2006a), Why People Obey the Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Tyler, T.R. (2006b), ‘Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation’, Annual Review of Psychology
Rasinski, K. (1991), ‘Procedural justice, institutional legitimacy, and the acceptance of unpopular U.S. Supreme Court decisions: a reply to Gibson’, Law & Society Review
van der Cruijsen, C.A.B.
Eijffinger, S.C.W. (2010), ‘From actual to perceived transparency: the case of the European Central Bank’, Journal of Economic Psychology
Waldau, S. (2010), Creating Organisational Capacity for Priority Setting in Healthcare: Using a Bottom-up Approach to Implement a Top-down Policy Decision, Umeå: Umeå University.
Warren, M.E. (1996), ‘Deliberative democracy and authority’, American Political Science Review
Worthy, B. (2010), ‘More open but not more trusted? The effect of the freedom of information act 2000 on the United Kingdom central government’, Governance
Zaller, J.R. (1992), The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, New York: Cambridge University PrePress.