Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Unleashing the watchdogs: explaining congressional assertiveness in the politics of US military interventions

  • Florian Böller (a1) and Marcus Müller (a2)
Abstract

This article contributes to a burgeoning literature on parliamentary war powers by investigating the case of the US Congress drawing on both International Relations (IR) research and traditional war powers studies. Applying a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis and case study method, we examine the conditions shaping congressional assertiveness. The article shows that the lack of national security interests and divided government are important conditions for members of Congress to criticize presidential intervention policies. While previous US war powers studies focused on the influence of partisanship, this article holds that domestic as well as international factors influence congressional behavior. A short comparative case study of two US military interventions (Libya 2011, ISIS 2014–15) during the Obama presidency serves to illustrate the findings.

Copyright
Corresponding author
References
Hide All
Bendery, J. (2015), ‘Congress just voted to fund the war against ISIS. Did they authorize it, too?’ Huffington Post, 18 December. Retrieved 5 September 2016 from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/congress-war-authorization-isis_us_56743423e4b 0b958f656590a.
Bretthauer, J.M. (2015), ‘Conditions for peace and conflict: applying a fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis to cases of resource scarcity’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 59(4): 593616.
Buzan, B., Wæver, O. and de Wilde, J. (1998), Security: A New Framework for Analysis, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Canes-Wrone, B. (2015), ‘From mass preference to policy’, Annual Review of Political Science 18: 147165.
Carothers, T. (2007), ‘The democracy crusade myth’, National Interest 90: 812.
Carter, R.G. and Scott, J.M. (2009), Choosing to Lead. Understanding Congressional Foreign Policy Entrepreneurs, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Chivvis, C.S. and Liepman, A.M. (2016), Authorities for Military Operations Against Terrorist Groups. The State of the Debate and Options for Congress, Washington, DC: Rand.
Chojnacki, S., Herchenbach, M. and Reisch, G. (2009), ‘Perspectives on war. Disentangling distinct phenomena: wars and military interventions, 1990-2008’, Sicherheit und Frieden 27(4): 242251.
Congressional Record (1994), ‘Proceedings and Debates of the U.S. Congress’. Retrieved 2 August 2018 from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record.
Congressional Record (2007), ‘Proceedings and Debates of the U.S. Congress’. Retrieved 2 August 2018 from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record.
Congressional Record (2011), ‘Proceedings and Debates of the U.S. Congress’. Retrieved 2 August 2018 from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record.
Congressional Record (2014), ‘Proceedings and Debates of the U.S. Congress’. Retrieved 2 August 2018 from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record.
Congressional Record (2015), ‘Proceedings and Debates of the U.S. Congress’. Retrieved 2 August 2018 from https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record.
Dieterich, S., Hummel, H. and Marschall, S. (2015), ‘Bringing democracy back in: the democratic peace, parliamentary war powers, and European participation in the 2003 Iraq war’, Cooperation and Conflict 50(1): 87106.
Duşa, A. (2007), ‘User manual for the QCA(GUI) package in R’, Journal of Business Research 60(5): 576586.
Eichenberg, R.C. (2005), ‘Victory has many friends: U.S. public opinion and the use of military force, 1981-2005’, International Security 30(1): 140177.
Fisher, L. (2004), Presidential War Power, Lawrence, KA: University of Kansas Press.
Geis, A., Müller, H. and Schörnig, N. (2013), ‘Liberal democracies as militant “Forces for Good”: a comparative perspective, in A. Geis, H. Müller and N. Schörnig (eds) The Militant Face of Democracy. Liberal Forces for Good, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 307344.
Gibler, D. (2010), ‘Outside-In: the effects of external threat on state centralization’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 54(4): 519542.
Goldsmith, J. and Waxman, M. (2016), ‘The legal legacy of light-footprint warfare’, Washington Quarterly 39(2): 721.
Gourevitch, P. (1978), ‘The second image reversed: the international sources of domestic politics’, International Organization 32(4): 881912.
Graham, T. (1994), ‘Public opinion and U.S. foreign policy decision making, in W. Lance Bennett and D.A. Deese (eds) The New Politics of American Foreign Policy, New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 190215.
Haas, P. (2017), ‘Does it even work? A theoretical and practical evaluation of the war powers resolution’, Congress and the Presidency 44(2): 235258.
Haesebrouck, T. (2018), Democratic participation in the air strikes against Islamic state: a qualitative comparative analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis 14(2): 254275.
Haesebrouck, T. (2017), ‘NATO burden sharing in Libya: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(10): 22352261.
Hegre, H. (2014), ‘Democracy and armed conflict’, Journal of Peace Research 51(2): 159172.
Hendrickson, R.C. (2002), The Clinton Wars: The Constitution, Congress, and War Powers, Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
Hendrickson, R.C. (2015), Obama at War: Congress and the Imperial Presidency, Lexington, KT: University Press of Kentucky.
Hendrickson, R.C. and Juszczak, L. (2017), ‘Dennis Kucinich and expansion of the chief executive’s war power: a unique legacy of checking the commander in chief’, African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 11(3): 5056.
Hildebrandt, T., Hillebrecht, C., Holm, P.M. and Pevehouse, J. (2013), ‘The domestic politics of humanitarian intervention: public opinion, partisanship, and ideology’, Foreign Policy Analysis 9(3): 243266.
House Armed Service Committee (HASC) (2014), Administration Strategy for ISIL. Hearing before the Committee on Armed Services. HASC No. 113-126, Washington, DC.
House Foreign Affairs Committee (HFAC) (2015), Growing Strategic Threat of ISIS: Hearing Before the Committee on Foreign Affairs. HFAC No. 114-17, Washington, DC.
Howell, W.G. and Pevehouse, J.C. (2007), While Dangers Gather: Congressional Checks on Presidential War Powers, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Howell, W.G. and Kriner, D. (2009), ‘Congress, the President, and the Iraq War’s domestic political front, in L.C. Dodd and B.I. Oppenheimer (eds) Congress Reconsidered, Washington, DC: Sage, pp. 311335.
Jentleson, B.W. and Britton, R.L. (1998), ‘Still pretty prudent: post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military force’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(4): 395417.
Kaarbo, J. (2015), ‘A foreign policy analysis perspective on the domestic politics turn in IR theory’, International Studies Review 17(2): 189216.
Kaarbo, J. and Kenealy, D. (2017), ‘Precedents, parliaments, and foreign policy: historical analogy in the house of commons vote on Syria’, West European Politics 40(1): 6279.
Kant, I. (1796), Project for a Perpetual Peace. Translated from the German, London: Vernor and Hood.
Klarevas, L.J., Gelpi, C. and Reifler, J. (2006), ‘Casualties, polls, and the Iraq War’, International Security 31(2): 186198.
Kriner, D. (2010), After the Rubicon: Congress, Presidents, and the Politics of Waging War, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Lindsay, J.M. (2004), ‘From deference to activism and back again: congress and the politics of American foreign policy, in E.R. Wittkopf and J.M. McCormick (eds) The Domestic Sources of American Foreign Policy: Insights and Evidence, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 183196.
MacMillan, J. (2004), ‘Whose democracy; which peace? Contextualizing the democratic peace’, International Politics 41(4): 472493.
Mann, T.E. and Ornstein, N.J. (2006), The Broken Branch: How Congress is Failing America and How to Get it Back on Track, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Mello, P.A. (2014), Democratic Participation in Armed Conflict: Military Involvement in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mello, P.A. and Peters, D. (2018), ‘Parliaments in security policy: involvement, politicisation, and influence’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20(1): 318.
Meernik, J. and Oldmixon, E. (2004), ‘Internationalism in congress’, Political Research Quarterly 57(3): 451465.
Milner, H.V. and Tingley, D. (2015), Sailing the Water’s Edge: American Foreign Policy and Domestic Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mueller, J. (2005), ‘The Iraq syndrome. The war and the public’, Foreign Affairs 84(6): 4454.
Müller, H. (2014), ‘Evilization in liberal discourse: from Kant’s “Unjust Enemy” to today’s “Rogue state”’, International Politics 51(4): 475491.
Peters, D. and Wagner, W. (2011), ‘Between military efficiency and democratic legitimacy: mapping parliamentary war powers in contemporary democracies, 1989-2004’, Parliamentary Affairs 64(1): 175192.
Pew (2017), ‘Partisans have starkly different opinions about how the world views the U.S.’. Retrieved 10 April 2018 from http://www.people-press.org/2017/11/09/partisans-have-starkly-different-opinions-about-how-the-world-views-the-u-s.
Pickering, J. and Kisangani, E.F. (2005), ‘Democracy and diversionary military intervention: reassessing regime type and the diversionary hypothesis’, International Studies Quarterly 49(1): 2343.
Polling Report (2016), ‘Foreign affairs and defense issues’. Retrieved 5 September 2016 from http://www.pollingreport.com/defense.htm.
Poznansky, M. (2015), ‘Stasis or decay? Reconciling covert war and the democratic peace’, International Studies Quarterly 51(4): 815826.
R Development Core Team (2017), R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Version 3.4.2. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Ragin, C.C. (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Raunio, T. and Wagner, W. (2017), ‘Towards parliamentarisation of foreign and security policy?’, West European Politics 40(1): 119.
Risse-Kappen, T. (1991), ‘Public opinion, domestic structure, and foreign policy in liberal democracies’, World Politics 43(4): 479512.
Russett, B.M. and Oneal, J.R. (2001), Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, New York: WW Norton.
Sarkesian, S.C., Williams, J.A. and Cimbala, S.J. (2008), U.S. National Security: Policymakers, Processes & Politics, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Schlesinger, A.M. (2004), The Imperial Presidency: With a New Introduction, Boston, MA/New York: Houghton Mifflin.
Schneider, C.Q. (2018), ‘Realists and idealists in QCA’. Political Analysis 26(2): 246–254.
Schneider, C.Q. and Rohlfing, I. (2013), ‘Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research’, Sociological Methods & Research 42(4): 559597.
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012), Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2013), ‘Doing justice to logical remainders in QCA: moving beyond the standard analysis’, Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 211220.
Senate Armed Services Committee (2014), Testimony on U.S. Policy Towards Iraq and Syria and the Threat Posed by ISIL, Hearing before the Committee on Armed Services. SASC No. 113-66, Washington, DC.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) (2014), United States Strategy to Defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant. SFRC No. 113-668, Washington DC.
Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) (2015), Presidents’ AUMF Proposal, Hearing before the Committee on Foreign Relations. SFRC No. 114-90, Washington, DC.
Stahl, B., Lucke, R. and Felfeli, A. (2016), ‘Comeback of the transatlantic security community? Comparative securitisation in the crimea crisis’, East European Politics 32(4): 525546.
Torreon, B.S. (2017), Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2017, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Trubowitz, P. and Mellow, N. (2011), ‘Foreign policy, bipartisanship and the paradox of post-September 11 America’, International Politics 48(2/3): 164187.
Wagemann, C., Buche, J. and Siewert, M.B. (2015), ‘QCA and business research: work in progress or a consolidated agenda?’, Journal of Business Research 69(7): 25312540.
Weed, M.W. (2016), A New Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Islamic State: Issues and Current Proposals, Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Weissman, S.R. (1995), A Culture of Deference: Congress’s Failure of Leadership in Foreign Policy, New York: BasicBooks.
Weissman, S.R. (2017), ‘Congress and war. How the house and the senate can reclaim their role’, Foreign Affairs 96(1): 132145.
Weldes, J. (1999), ‘The cultural production of crisis: U.S. identity and missiles in Cuba, in J. Weldes, M. Laffey, H. Gusterson and R. Duvall (eds) Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities and the Production of Danger, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 3562.
White House (2011), ‘Letter from the President Regarding the Commencement of Operations in Libya’, Press release, 21 March 2011. Retrieved 5 September 2016 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/03/21/letter-president-regarding-commencement-operations-libya.
White House (2014), ‘President Barack Obama: Remarks at a Press Conference’, Press release, 23 September 2014. Retrieved 5 September 2016 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/09/23/letter-president-war-powers-resolution-regarding-iraq.
White House (2015), ‘Remarks by the President in State of the Union Address’, Press release, 20 January 2015. Retrieved 5 September 2016 from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/01/20/remarks-president-state-union-address-january-20-2015.
Zelizer, J.E. (2010), ‘Congress and the politics of troop withdrawal’, Diplomatic History 34(3): 529541.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Böller and Müller supplementary material
Böller and Müller supplementary material 1

 Word (108 KB)
108 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Böller and Müller supplementary material 2
Böller and Müller supplementary material 2

 Unknown (860 bytes)
860 bytes
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Böller and Müller supplementary material 3
Böller and Müller supplementary material 3

 Unknown (40 KB)
40 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed