Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Why do some oil exporters experience civil war but others do not?: investigating the conditional effects of oil

  • Matthias Basedau (a1) and Thomas Richter (a1)
Abstract

According to quantitative studies, oil seems the only natural resource that is robustly linked to civil war onset. However, recent debates on the nexus of oil and internal conflict have neglected the fact that there are a number of peaceful rentier oil states in existence. Few efforts have been made to explain why some oil-exporting countries have experienced civil war while others have not. We thus address this puzzle, by arguing that civil war risks depend on the specific conditions of oil production and how they come to structure state–society relations. Specifically, we expect that states that are either highly dependent on oil or who have problematic relations with oil regions are prone to civil war. However, these risks will be mitigated either when democratic institutions can manage conflicts peacefully or when abundant oil revenues can be spent in such a way as to buy peace. We test this conditional argument by comparing 39 net oil exporters, using a (crisp-set) Qualitative Comparative Analysis – a methodology particularly suited to test conditional relationships in medium-N samples. Our results largely confirm our conditional hypotheses. Conditions of oil production are ambiguous, and particular combinations thus explain the onset of civil war. Specifically, we find that high abundance is sufficient to ensure peace, while two distinct pathways lead to civil war: the combination of high dependence and low abundance, as well as the overlap of ethnic exclusion and oil reserves in non-abundant and non-democratic oil states.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: thomas.richter@giga-hamburg.de
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Basedau and J. Lay (2009), ‘Resource curse or rentier peace? The ambigious effects of oil wealth and oil dependence on violent conflict’, Journal of Peace Research 46(6): 757776.

P. Le Billon (2008), ‘Diamond wars? Conflict diamonds and geographies of resource wars’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers 98(2): 345372.

P. Collier and A. Hoeffler (2004), ‘Greed and grievance in civil war’, Oxford Economic Papers 56(4): 563595.

P. Collier and A. Hoeffler (2005), ‘Resource rents, governance, and conflict’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 625633.

J. Dixon (2009), ‘What causes civil wars? Integrating quantitative research findings’, International Studies Review 11(4): 707735.

P. Englebert and J. Ron (2004), ‘Primary commodities and war: Congo-Brazzaville’s ambivalent resource curse’, Comparative Politics 37(1): 6181.

J.D. Fearon (2005), ‘Primary commodities exports and civil war’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 483507.

N.P. Gleditsch , P. Wallensteen and M. Eriksson (2002), ‘Armed conflict 1946–2001: a new dataset’, Journal of Peace Research 39(5): 615637.

B. Grofman and C.Q. Schneider (2009), ‘An introduction to crisp set QCA, with a comparison to binary logistic regression’, Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 662672.

H. Hegre and N. Sambanis (2006), ‘Sensitivity analysis of empirical results on civil war onset’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 50(4): 508535.

M. Humphreys (2005), ‘Natural resources, conflict, and conflict resolution – uncovering the mechanisms’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 508537.

P. Lujala , N.P. Gleditsch and E. Gilmore (2005), ‘A diamond curse? Civil war and a lootable resource’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 538562.

P. Lujala (2010), ‘The spoils of nature: armed civil conflict and rebel access to natural resources’, Journal of Peace Research 47(1): 1528.

P.J. Luong and E. Weinthal (2006), ‘Rethinking the resource curse: ownership, structure, institutional capacity, and domestic constraints’, Annual Review of Political Science 9: 241263.

C.M. Metelits (2008), ‘The consequences of rivalry: explaining insurgent violence using fuzzy sets’, Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 673684.

C.C. Ragin (2008), Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

M.L. Ross (2004a), ‘What do we know about natural resources and civil war?’, Journal of Peace Research 41(3): 337356.

M.L. Ross (2006), ‘A closer look at oil, diamonds, and civil war’, Annual Review of Political Science 9(1): 265300.

R. Snyder and R. Bhavnani (2005), ‘Diamonds, blood, and taxes – a revenue-centered framework for explaining political order’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(4): 563597.

J.R. Vreeland (2008), ‘The effect of political regime on civil war: unpacking anocracy’, Journal of Conflict Resolution 52(3): 401425.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Basedau and Richter Supplementary Material
Appendix

 Word (480 KB)
480 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 89 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 235 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.