Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Will to power? Intra-party conflict in social democratic parties and the choice for neoliberal policies in Germany, the Netherlands and Spain (1980–2010)

  • Paul Marx (a1) (a2) and Gijs Schumacher (a3) (a4)
Abstract

Why do social democrats choose neoliberal labor market policies? Since social democrats are typically punished for welfare state retrenchment and because these policies do not equate well with social democratic egalitarian principles, it is difficult to see what they gain from it. We argue that, depending on the intra-party balance of power between activists and leaders, some parties are office-seeking, whereas others are policy-seeking. This behavioral difference explains why some parties are responsive to environmental incentives such as the economy and public opinion (office-seeking parties) and others are responsive to policy-motivated activists (policy-seeking parties). Using three case studies of social democratic parties (Germany, the Netherlands and Spain) in the period 1980–2010, we analyze when and why these parties introduced neoliberal reforms. The study shows that office-seeking parties introduce neoliberal measures if the risk of losing votes due to an underperforming economy becomes larger than the risk of losing votes due to the mobilization of unions and opposition parties. Policy-seeking social democrats retain a social democratic ideology, unless prolonged failure to win office empowers pragmatic leaders to push through office-seeking strategies.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mails: marx@sam.sdu.dk, gijs@sam.sdu.dk
References
Hide All
Allan, J.P.Scruggs, L. (2004), ‘Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies’, American Journal of Political Science 48: 496512.
Amable, B., Gatti, D.Schumacher, J. (2006), ‘Welfare-state retrenchment: the partisan effect revisited’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22: 426444.
Bleich, A. (1986), Een Partij in de Tijd. Veertig jaar Partij van de Arbeid 1946–1986, Amsterdam: Arbeiderpers.
Budge, I.Laver, M. (1986), ‘Office seeking and policy pursuit in coalition theory’, Legislative Studies Quarterly 11: 485506.
Conradt, D.P. (2010), ‘The shrinking elephants. The 2009 elections and the changing party system’, German Politics and Society 28: 2546.
Debus, M. (2008), ‘Unfulfilled promises? German social democrats and their policy positions at the federal and state level between 1994 and 2006’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinions and Parties 18: 201224.
Duch, R.M.Stevenson, R.T. (2008), The Economic Vote. How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ebbinghaus, B.Eichhorst, W. (2009), ‘Employment regulation and labor market policy in Germany, 1991–2005’, in P.D. Beer and T. Schils (eds), The Labour Market Triangle Employment Protection, Unemployment Compensation and Activation in Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 119144.
Egle, C.Henkes, C. (2004a), ‘In search of social democracy – explaining the politics and policies of the Schröder government 1998–2002’, in S.Haseler and H.Meyer (eds), Reshaping Social Democracy. Labour and the SPD in the New Century, London: European Research Forum at London Metropolitan University, pp. 163191.
Egle, C.Henkes, C. (2004b), ‘Später Sieg der Modernisierer über die Traditionalisten? Die Programmdebatte der SPD’, in C. Egle, T. Ostheim and R. Zohlnhöfer (eds), Das Rot-Grüne Projekt. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Schröder 1998–2002, Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 6792.
Eichhorst, W.Marx, P. (2011), ‘Reforming german labor market institutions: a dual path to flexibility’, Journal of European Social Policy 21: 7387.
Encarnación, O.G. (2006), ‘Spain's new left turn: society driven or party instigated’, South European Society and Politics 14: 399415.
Field, B.N. (2006), ‘Transitions to democracy and internal party rules. Spain in comparative perspective’, Comparative Politics 39: 83102.
Gillespie, R. (1993), ‘“Programa 2000”: the appearance and reality of socialist renewal in Spain’, in R. Gillespie and W. E. Paterson (eds), Rethinking Social Democracy in Western Europe, London: Frank Cass & Co, pp. 7897.
Green-Pedersen, C.Van Kersbergen, K. (2002), ‘The politics of the ‘third way’. The transformation of social democracy in Denmark and the Netherlands’, Party Politics 8: 507524.
Green-Pedersen, C., Van Kersbergen, K.Hemerijck, A. (2001), ‘Neo-liberalism, the ‘third-way’, or what? Recent social democratic welfare policies in Denmark and the Netherlands’, Journal of European Public Policy 8: 307325.
Gutiérrez, R.Guillén, A.M. (2000), ‘Protecting the long-term unemployed. The impact of targeting policies in Spain’, European Societies 2: 195216.
Hillebrand, R.Irwin, G.A. (1999), ‘Changing strategies: the dilemma of the Dutch Labour Party’, in W.C. Muller and K. Strom (eds), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112141.
Harmel, R., Heo, U., Tan, A.Janda, K. (1995), ‘Performance, leadership, factions and party change: an empirical analysis’, West European Politics 18: 133.
Huber, E.Stephens, J.D. (2001), Developments and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kitschelt, H. (1994), The Transformation of European Social Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kitschelt, H. (2001), ‘Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment. When do politicians choose unpopular policies?’, in P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 265304.
Kittel, B.Obinger, H. (2003), ‘Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity’, Journal of European Public Policy 10: 2045.
Klitgaard, M.B. (2007), ‘Why are they doing it? Social democracy and market-oriented welfare state reforms’, West European Politics 30: 172194.
Koole, R.Leijenaar, M. (1988), ‘The Netherlands: the predominance of regionalism’, in M. Gallagher and M. Marsh (eds), Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective, London: SAGE, pp. 205225.
Korpi, W. (1983), The Democratic Class Struggle, London: Routledge.
Korpi, W. (2003), ‘Welfare-state regress in Western Europe: politics, institutions, globalization, and Europeanization’, Annual Review of Sociology 29: 589609.
Korte, K.R. (2007), ‘Der Pragmatiker des Augenblicks: Das Politikmanagement von Bundeskanzler Gerhard Schröder 2002–2005’, in C. Egle and R. Zohlnhöfer (eds), Ende des rot-grünen Projektes. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Schröder 2002–2005, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 168196.
Laver, M.Hunt, W.B. (1992), Policy and Party Competition, London: Routledge.
Levy, J.D. (1999), ‘Vice into virtue? Progressive politics and welfare reform in continental Europe’, Politics and Society 27: 239274.
Lucardie, P.Voerman, G. (1989), Kroniek 1989. Overzicht van de partijpolitieke gebeurtenissen van het jaar 1989, Groningen: Documentatiecentrum Nederlandse Politieke Partijen.
Mato, J.F. (2011), ‘Spain – fragmented unemployment protection in a segmented labour market’, in J. Clasen and D. Clegg (eds), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment. National Adaptations to Post-industrial Labour Markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164186.
Méndez Lago, M. (2006), ‘Turning the page: crisis and transformation of the Spanish Socialist Party’, South European Society and Politics 11: 419437.
Merkel, W.Petring, A. (2008), Social Democracy in Power: The Capacity to Reform, London/New York: Routledge.
Meyer, T. (1999), ‘From Godesberg to Neue Mitte: the new social democracy in Germany’, in G. Kelly (ed.), The New European Left, London: Fabian Society, pp. 2034.
Meyer, T. (2007), ‘Die blockierte Partei: Regierungspraxis und Programmdiskussion der SPD 2002–2005’, in C. Egle and R. Zohlnhöfer (eds), Ende des rot-grünen Projektes. Eine Bilanz der Regierung Schröder 2002–2005, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 8397.
Müller, W.C.Strøm, K. (1999), Policy, Office or Votes. How Political Parties in Europe make Hard Decisions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Picot, G. (2009), ‘Party competition and reforms of unemployment benefits in Germany: how a small change in electoral demand can make a big difference’, German Politics 18: 155179.
Pierson, P. (1996), ‘The new politics of the welfare state’, World Politics 48: 143179.
PvdA (1987). Schuivende Panelen. Continuïteit en vernieuwing in de sociaal-democratie. Amsterdam: Huisdrukkerij PvdA.
PvdA (1988). Bewogen Beweging, sociaal-democratie als program en methode. Amsterdam: Huisdrukkerij PvdA.
Raschke, J. (2010), ‘Zerfallsphase des Schröder-Zyklus: Die SPD 2005–2009’, in C. Egle and R. Zohlnhöfer (eds), Die zweite Große Koalition. Eine Balanz der Regierung Merkel 2005–2009, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 6998.
Recio, A.Roca, J. (1998), ‘The Spanish socialists in power: thirteen years of economic policy’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14: 139158.
Ross, F. (2000), ‘“Beyond left and right”: the new partisan politics of welfare’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13: 155183.
Royo, S. (2000), From Social Democracy to Neoliberalism. The Consequences of Party Hegemony in Spain, 1982–1996, New York: St Martin's Press.
Royo, S. (2006), ‘Reforms betrayed? Zapatero and continuities in economic policy’, South European Society and Politics 14: 435451.
Rueda, D. (2007), Social Democracy Inside Out: Partisanship and Labor Market Policy in Advanced Industrialized Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Saalfeld, T. (2006), ‘Conflict and consensus in Germany's bi-cameral system: a case study of the passage of the agenda 2010’, Debatte 14: 247269.
Schmidt, M.G. (1996), ‘When parties matter: a review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy’, European Journal of Political Research 30: 155183.
Schmidt, M.G. (2010), ‘Die Sozialpolitik der zweiten großen Koalition (2005 bis 2009)’, in C. Egle and R. Zohlnhöfer (eds), Die zweite Große Koalition. Eine Balanz der Regierung Merkel 2005–2009, Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 302326.
Schumacher, G. (forthcoming), ‘When does the left do the right thing? A study of party position change on welfare policies’, Party Politics.
Schumacher, G., Vis, B., Van Kersbergen, K. (forthcoming). ‘Party's Welfare Image, Electoral Punishment and Welfare State Retrenchment’. Comparative European Politics.
Share, D. (1988), ‘Dilemmas of social democracy in the 1980s. The Spanish socialist workers party in comparative perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 21: 408435.
Stimson, J.A., Mackuen, M.B.Erikson, R.S. (1995), ‘Dynamic representation’, American Political Science Review 89: 543565.
Vail, M. (2010), ‘Left of Eden: the changing politics of economic inequality in contemporary Germany’, German Politics 18: 559576.
Van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy 16: 2342.
Van Praag, P. (1990), Strategie en Illusie. Elf Jaar intern debat in de PvdA (1966–1977), Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, pp. 133150.
Van Praag, P. (1994), ‘Conflict and cohesion in the Dutch Labour Party’, in D.S. Bell and E. Shaw (eds), Conflict & Cohesion in Western European Social Democratic Parties, London: Pinter Publishers.
Vis, B. (2009), ‘Governments and unpopular social policy reform: biting the bullet or steering clear?’, European Journal of Political Research 48: 3157.
Von Beyme, K. (1990), ‘Gewerkschaftliche Politik in der Wirtschaftskrise I: 1973 bis 1978’, in H.-O. Hemmer and K.T. Schmitz (eds), Geschichte der Gewerkschaften in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Von den Anfängen bis heute, Köln: Bund, pp. 339374.
Wolinetz, S.B. (1977), ‘The Dutch Labour Party: a social democratic party in transition’, in W.E. Paterson and A.H. Thomas (eds), Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe, London: Croom Helm, pp. 342388.
Wolinetz, S.B. (1993), ‘Reconstructing dutch social democracy: programmatic and organisational review in the Dutch Labour Party’, West European Politics 12: 97111.
Zohlnhöfer, R. (2003), ‘Partisan politics, party competition and veto players: German economic policy in the Kohl era’, Journal of Public Policy 23: 123156.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed