Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies

  • Céline Teney (a1), Onawa Promise Lacewell (a2) and Pieter De Wilde (a3)
Abstract

Globalization pressures result in a new ideological conflict among Europeans. We use detailed items from the Eurobarometer survey on issues of immigration and European integration that measure the ideological perspective underpinning positions toward the EU. This provides a fine-grained analysis of the ideologies underlying the poles of the new globalization-centered conflict line, which we define as cosmopolitan and communitarian. Our results show that, next to socio-demographic characteristics, subjective measurements have a considerable additional power in explaining the divide among Europeans along the communitarian–cosmopolitan dimension. Subjective deprivation, evaluation of globalization as a threat, and (sub)national and supranational identities play an important role in dividing Europeans into groups of winners and losers of globalization in both Western and Central and Eastern European countries. At the country level, the national degree of globalization is associated positively with the communitarian pole and negatively with the cosmopolitan pole in all EU countries.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*E-mail: celine.teney@wzb.eu
References
Hide All
Azmanova, A. (2009), ‘1989 and the European social model: transition without emancipation?’, Philosophy & Social Criticism 35(9): 10191037.
Azmanova, A. (2011), ‘After the left–right (dis)continuum: globalization and the remaking of Europe’s ideological geography’, International Political Sociology 5(4): 384407.
Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990), Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability: The Stabilisation of European Electorates, 1885–1985 , Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bell, D. (1993), Communitarianism and its Critics, Oxford: Claredon Press.
Bornschier, S. (2010), Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right. The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
De Wilde, P. (2011), ‘No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing politicization of European integration’, Journal of European Integration 33(5): 559575.
De Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. (2012), ‘Can the politicization of European integration be reversed?’, Journal of Common Market Studies 50(1): 137153.
De Wilde, P. and Zürn, M. (2013), ‘Debating Globalization: Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism as Political Ideologies’, unpublished manuscript, WZB.
Diez Medrano, J. (2010), ‘A new society in the making. European integration and European social groups’, KFG Working Paper 12: 131.
Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008), Measuring Globalization – Gauging its Consequence, New York: Springer.
Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2011), ‘Cosmopolitan politicization: how perceptions of interdependence foster citizens' expectations in international institutions’, European Journal of International Relations 18(3): 481508.
Eriksen, E.O. (2009), ‘The EU: a cosmopolitan vanguard?’, Global Jurist 9(1): 123.
Fligstein, N. (2008), Euro-clash . The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hanquinet, L. and Savage, M. (2012), ‘The Europeanisation of everyday life: cross-border practices and transnational identifications among EU and third-country citizens. Operationalisation of European identity, cosmopolitanism and cross-border practices’, EUCROSS Working Paper (2), 153.
Hanquinet, L. and Savage, M. (2013), ‘The Europeanisation of everyday life: cross-border practices and transnational identifications among EU and third-country citizens. Europeanization and globalisation’, EUCROSS Working Paper (6), 120.
Herzog, A. and Tucker, J.A. (2010), ‘The dynamics of support: the winners-losers gap in attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries’, European Political Science Review 2(2): 235267.
Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009), ‘A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 123.
Jiménez, A.M.R., Górniak, J.J., Kosic, A., Kiss, P. and Kandulla, M. (2004), ‘European and national identities in EU’s old and new member states: ethnic, civic, instrumental and symbolic components’, European Integration Online Papers 8(11): 137.
Kendall, G., Skrbis, Z. and Woodward, I. (2009), The Sociology of Cosmopolitanism , London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2008), West European Politics in the Age of Globalization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Hoeglinger, D. and Hutter, S. (2012), Political Conflict in Western Europe, Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Lacewell, O.P. and Merkel, W.M. (2013), ‘Value Shifts in European Societies: Clashes between Cosmopolitanism and Communitarianism’, in O. Cramme, P. Diamond and M. McTernan (eds), Progressive Politics After The Clash: Governing From the Left, London/New York: I.B. Tauris, 7795.
Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Lubbers, M. and Scheepers, P. (2010), ‘Divergent trends of euroscepticism in countries and regions of the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research 49(6): 787817.
Mau, S. (2005), ‘Europe from the bottom: assessing personal gains and losses and its effects on EU support’, Journal of Public Policy 25(3): 289311.
Phillips, T. (2002), ‘Imagined communities and self-identity: an exploratory quantitative analysis’, Sociology-The Journal Of The British Sociological Association 36(3): 597617.
Phillips, T. and Smith, P. (2008), ‘Cosmopolitan beliefs and cosmopolitan practices’, Journal of Sociology 44(4): 391399.
Pichler, F. (2009a), ‘Cosmopolitan Europe’, European Societies 11: 324.
Pichler, F. (2009b), ‘Down-to-Earth’ cosmopolitanism subjective and objective measurements of cosmopolitanism in survey research’, Current Sociology 57(5): 704732.
Pichler, F. (2012), ‘Cosmopolitanism in a global perspective: an international comparison of open-minded orientations and identity in relation to globalization’, International Sociology 27(1): 2150.
Pogge, T.W. (1992), ‘Cosmopolitanism and sovereignty’, Ethics 103(1): 4875.
Sandel, M. (1998), Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schlueter, E., Meuleman, B. and Davidov, E. (2013), ‘Immigrant integration policies and perceived group threat: a multilevel study of 27 Western and Eastern European Countries’, Social Science Research 42: 670682.
Snijders, T.A.B. and Bosker, R.J. (1999), Multilevel Analysis. An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, London: Sage.
Teney, C. (2012), ‘Space matters. the group threat hypothesis revisited with geographically weighted regression. The case of the NPD 2009 electoral success’, Zeitschrift für Soziologie 41(3): 207226.
Van der Brug, W. and van Spanje, J. (2009), ‘Immigration, Europe and the ‘new’ cultural dimension’, European Journal of Political Research 48(3): 309334.
Walter, S. (2010), ‘Globalization and the welfare state: testing the microfoundations of the compensation hypothesis’, International Studies Quarterly 54: 403426.
Zürn, M. (1998), Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Zürn, M. (2012), ‘The politicization of world politics and its effects: eight propositions’, European Political Sience Review, 125.
Zürn, M., Binder, M. and Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012), ‘International authority and its politicization’, International Theory 4(1): 69106.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 1755-7739
  • EISSN: 1755-7747
  • URL: /core/journals/european-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Teney et al. Supplementary Material
Tables and Figures

 Word (88 KB)
88 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed