Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-f6s65 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T12:34:21.683Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Putting the Learning into E-learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Dave Middleton
Dave Middleton*
Affiliation:
The Open University in Wales, 18 Custom House Street, Cardiff CF10 1AP, UK
*
E-mail: D.J.Middleton@open.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There has been an increase in the use of e-learning as a form of delivering higher education. Much of the innovation has gone hand in hand with what has been called an ‘evaluation bypass’ and has seemingly been popular because of its economic efficiency. The literature on new technologies tends to be written by those committed to the innovation. They tend to present innovation as a good, regardless of what the innovation is, and ‘resistors’ as in some senses deviant. Using the example of the Higher Education Funding Council for England-funded multimedia project, ‘Doing Political Research’, this paper argues that some degree of scepticism about innovation can be seen as a positive response. Furthermore, the paper argues that the cost-saving arguments put forward by proponents of innovation are illusory. E-learning can be as costly as other means. However, it does offer alternative ways to teach and can be particularly effective at reaching isolated learners. The conclusion is that for e-learning to be effective it must place learning first.

Keywords

e-learninginnovationtechnologyevaluation

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
European Political Science , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 5 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 European Consortium for Political Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aspden, L. and Helm, P. (2004) ‘Making the connection in a blended learning environment’, Educational Media International 41(3): 245–252 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, A. (2007) ‘Blogs, wikis and podcasts: the evaluation bypass’, Health Information and Libraries Journal 24: 298–302 .10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00739.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunderson, V. (2003) ‘Four frameworks for viewing blended learning cases’, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3): 279–288 .Google Scholar
Lambeir, B. and Ramaeken, S. (2006) ‘The Limits of Blackboard are the limits of my world: on the changing concepts of the university and its students’, E-Learning 3(4): 544–551 .Google Scholar
Oakleigh Consulting. (2008) ‘Interim evaluation of the Higher Education Academy’, A report to HEFCE, HEFCW, SFC, DELNI, GuildHE and UUK.Google Scholar
Osguthorpe, R. and Graham, C. (2003) ‘Blended learning environments: definitions and directions’, The Quarterly Review of Distance Education 4(3): 227–233 .Google Scholar
McFedries, P. (1998) The Complete Idiot's Guide to Creating an HTML 4 Web Page, Indianapolis, USA: Que A division of MacMillan Computer Publishing.Google Scholar
Middleton, D. and Bridge, K. (2008) ‘Multimedia learning: lessons from the PARLE project’, European Political Science 7(2): 144–152 .10.1057/eps.2008.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Shepherd, C. (2002) ‘Back to basics – e-learning in 2003’, http://www.fastrak-consulting.co.uk/tactix/Features/basics.htm, accessed 8 September 2008.Google Scholar
Teichler, U. (1998) ‘Massification: a challenge for institutions of higher education’, Tertiary Education and Management 4(1): 17–27 .10.1080/13583883.1998.9966942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, A. (2005) ‘Building online learning communities’, Technology Pedagogy and Education 14(3): 353–369 .10.1080/14759390500200211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinklin, T., Riddell, S. and Wilson, A. (2004) ‘Disabled students in higher education’, http://www.ces.ed.ac.uk/PDF%20Files/Brief032.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wisker, G., Robinson, G. and Schacham, M. (2007) ‘Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities’, Innovations in Education and Teaching International 44(3): 301–320 .10.1080/14703290701486720CrossRefGoogle Scholar