Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Survival of the richest? Social status, fertility and social mobility in England 1541-1824

  • NINA BOBERG-FAZLIC (a1), PAUL SHARP (a2) and JACOB WEISDORF (a3)
Abstract

We use data collected by the Cambridge Group to investigate and explain differences in fertility by socio-economic group in pre-industrial England. We find, in line with results presented by Greg Clark, that wealthier groups did indeed have higher fertility until the 1700s. We demonstrate that this had to do with earlier age at marriage for women. We then turn to the likely social and economic impact of this, considering Clark's hypothesis that ‘middle-class values’ spread through English society prior to the Industrial Revolution. Through the construction of social mobility tables, we demonstrate that the children of the rich were indeed spreading through society, but they were small in number relative to poorer sections of society, and moreover the children of the poor were also entering the middle classes.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Becker G. S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature 14 (3), pp. 817–26.
Blackmore S. (2000). The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Booth C. (1886). Occupations of the people of the United Kingdom. Journal of the Statistical Society of London 49 (2), pp. 314444.
Clark G. (2007). A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Clark G. (2008). In defense of the Malthusian interpretation of history. European Review of Economic History 12 (2), pp. 175–99.
Clark G. and Cummins N. (2009). Urbanization, mortality, and fertility in Malthusian England. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 99 (2), pp. 242–7.
Clark G. and Cummins N. (2010). Malthus to modernity: England's first fertility transition, 1760–1800. Mimeo.
Clark G. and Hamilton G. (2006). Survival of the richest: the Malthusian mechanism in pre-industrial England. Journal of Economic History 66 (3), pp. 707–36.
Cummins N. (2009). Marital fertility and wealth in transition era France, 1750–1850. Working Paper No. 2009–16, Paris School of Economics.
Dawkins R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ferrie J. and Long J. (2010). Intergenerational occupational mobility in Britain and the US since 1850. American Economic Review (forthcoming)
Galor O. (2005). From stagnation to growth: Unified Growth Theory. In Aghion P. and Durlauf S. N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, vol. 1A. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Galor O. and Moav O. (2002). Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4), pp. 1133–91.
Goldthorpe J. H., Llewellyn C. and Payne C. (1980). Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grantham G. (2008). Explaining the industrial transition: a non-Malthusian perspective. European Review of Economic History 12 (2), pp. 155–65.
Heath A. and Payne C. (2000). Social mobility. In Halsey A. H. and Webb J. (eds.), Twentieth-Century British Social Trends, 3rd edn.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Leunig T., Minns C. and Wallis P. (2009). Networks in the premodern economy: the market for London apprenticeships, 1600–1749. CEP Discussion Paper, No. 956
Lindert P. H. and Williamson J. G. (1982). Revising England's social tables, 1688–1812. Explorations in Economic History 19 (4), pp. 385408.
Livi-Bacci M. (1977). A History of Italian Fertility During the Last Two Centuries. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Long J. (2010). Social mobility within and across generations in Britain since 1851. Mimeo.
McCloskey D. (2008). ‘You know Ernest, the rich are different from you and me’: a comment on Clark's A Farewell to Alms. European Review of Economic History 12 (2), pp. 138–48.
Miles A. (1999). Social Mobility in Nineteenth- and Early Twentieth-Century England. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Persson G. (2008). The Malthus delusion. European Review of Economic History 12 (2), pp. 165–73.
Shenk D. (2010). The Genius in All of Us: Why Everything You've Been Told About Genetics, Talent and IQ Is Wrong. New York: Doubleday.
Souden D. (1984). Movers and stayers in family reconstitution populations. Local Population History 33, pp. 1128.
van der Beek K. (2010). Technology–skill complementarity on the eve of the Industrial Revolution: new evidence from England, 1710–1722. MS, Ben-Gurion University.
Vann R. T. and Eversley D. (1992). Friends in Life and Death: The British and Irish Quakers in the Demographic Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Voth H.-J. (2008). Clark's intellectual Sudoku. European Review of Economic History 12 (2), pp. 149–55.
Weir D. R. (1994). New estimates of nuptiality and marital fertility in France, 1740–1911. Population Studies 48 (2), pp. 307–31.
West-Eberhard M. J. (2003). Developmental Plasticity and Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wrigley E. A., Davies R.Oeppen J. and Schofield R. (1997). English Population History from Family Reconstitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

European Review of Economic History
  • ISSN: 1361-4916
  • EISSN: 1474-0044
  • URL: /core/journals/european-review-of-economic-history
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 45 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 271 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.